Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) v. Hanjra, 2018 FC 207

JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
CourtFederal Court (Canada)
Citation2018 FC 207
Date23 February 2018
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 practice notes
  • A Inc. v. Canadian Museum for Human Rights, 2022 FC 1115
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • July 26, 2022
    ...the material that was before the initial decision-maker: see for example Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) v Hanjra, 2018 FC 207 at paras 17–20, albeit in a different context, where the Court noted that any document that was before a decision-maker when it made its decision is pre......
  • Al Mousawmaii v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 1256
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • December 11, 2018
    ...Southcott J. to make a determination on the application of police informer privilege (see Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) v Hanjra, 2018 FC 207 [Hanjra 207]. It is important to note that in the context of that application, unlike the matter we are concerned with here, counsel for the m......
  • Dubeau v. Canada (Attorney General), 2019 FC 725
    • Canada
    • Canada (Federal) Federal Court (Canada)
    • May 22, 2019
    ...granted under Rule 38 and to proceed with a hearing of the case in the applicant’s absence (Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) v Hanjra, 2018 FC 207 at para 7; Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) v Hanjra, 2018 FC 208 at para 15): Absence of party Absence d’une partie 38 Where a party fa......
  • Enache v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 182
    • Canada
    • Canada (Federal) Federal Court (Canada)
    • February 12, 2019
    ...identity including all information which might tend to identify the informer (see Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) v Hanjra, 2018 FC 207 [Hanjra] at para 22). The test for application of this privilege is, first, that the informer provided information to an investigating authority and, ......
4 cases
  • A Inc. v. Canadian Museum for Human Rights, 2022 FC 1115
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • July 26, 2022
    ...the material that was before the initial decision-maker: see for example Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) v Hanjra, 2018 FC 207 at paras 17–20, albeit in a different context, where the Court noted that any document that was before a decision-maker when it made its decision is pre......
  • Al Mousawmaii v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 1256
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • December 11, 2018
    ...Southcott J. to make a determination on the application of police informer privilege (see Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) v Hanjra, 2018 FC 207 [Hanjra 207]. It is important to note that in the context of that application, unlike the matter we are concerned with here, counsel for the m......
  • Dubeau v. Canada (Attorney General), 2019 FC 725
    • Canada
    • Canada (Federal) Federal Court (Canada)
    • May 22, 2019
    ...granted under Rule 38 and to proceed with a hearing of the case in the applicant’s absence (Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) v Hanjra, 2018 FC 207 at para 7; Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) v Hanjra, 2018 FC 208 at para 15): Absence of party Absence d’une partie 38 Where a party fa......
  • Enache v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 182
    • Canada
    • Canada (Federal) Federal Court (Canada)
    • February 12, 2019
    ...identity including all information which might tend to identify the informer (see Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) v Hanjra, 2018 FC 207 [Hanjra] at para 22). The test for application of this privilege is, first, that the informer provided information to an investigating authority and, ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT