Carruthers v Carruthers
| Jurisdiction | Saskatchewan |
| Judge | Ryan-Froslie, Schwann and Leurer JJ.A. |
| Neutral Citation | 2021 SKCA 52 |
| Docket Number | CACV3365 |
| Date | 06 April 2021 |
| Citation | 2021 SKCA 52 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan) |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
6 practice notes
-
S.B. v T.B.,
...FPA. [44] That point was explained by this Court in Carruthers v Carruthers, 2021 SKCA 52, 56 RFL (8th) 110 [50] Further, it is important to recognize that finding a residence to be a family home,......
-
Goertzen v Goertzen,
...14; and L.P. v Z.M., 2021 SKCA 134 at para 31. See also D.B.B. v D.M.B., 2017 SKCA 59 at para 172 [ D.B.B.], and Carruthers v Carruthers, 2021 SKCA 52 at para 38, 56 RFL (8th) 110, leave to appeal to SCC refused, 2022 CanLII 5852 [ 20 More recently, as cases like Kolodziejski v Maximiuk, 20......
-
Suderman v Yakubowski‑Suderman,
...This was done by the trial judge in Carruthers v Carruthers, 2019 SKQB 7 at 65 (Schedule “A”) [Carruthers QB], aff’d 2021 SKCA 52 at para 106, 56 RFL (8th) 110 [Carruthers CA]. In other cases, courts have calculated the family property in each party’s hands ......
-
Sidhu v Sidhu,
...is a legal, rather than an equitable claim and its value is easily ascertainable (or already ascertained). 86 Carruthers v. Carruthers, 2021 SKCA 52 at paras. 73 and 88 is authority for the proposition that a claim in unjust enrichment can be a chose in action within the meaning of family p......
Get Started for Free
8 cases
-
S.B. v T.B.
...FPA. [44]           That point was explained by this Court in Carruthers v Carruthers, 2021 SKCA 52, 56 RFL (8th) 110 [50]      Further, it is important to recognize that finding a residence to be a family home,......
-
Goertzen v Goertzen
...14; and L.P. v Z.M., 2021 SKCA 134 at para 31. See also D.B.B. v D.M.B., 2017 SKCA 59 at para 172 [ D.B.B.], and Carruthers v Carruthers, 2021 SKCA 52 at para 38, 56 RFL (8th) 110, leave to appeal to SCC refused, 2022 CanLII 5852 [ 20 More recently, as cases like Kolodziejski v Maximiuk, 20......
-
Suderman v Yakubowski‑Suderman
...This was done by the trial judge in Carruthers v Carruthers, 2019 SKQB 7 at 65 (Schedule “A”) [Carruthers QB], aff’d 2021 SKCA 52 at para 106, 56 RFL (8th) 110 [Carruthers CA]. In other cases, courts have calculated the family property in each party’s hands ......
-
Sidhu v Sidhu
...is a legal, rather than an equitable claim and its value is easily ascertainable (or already ascertained). 86 Carruthers v. Carruthers, 2021 SKCA 52 at paras. 73 and 88 is authority for the proposition that a claim in unjust enrichment can be a chose in action within the meaning of family p......
Get Started for Free