Carruthers v. Carruthers and Whiteshore Land & Cattle
| Jurisdiction | Saskatchewan |
| Judge | Goebel |
| Citation | 2019 SKQB 7 |
| Date | 09 January 2019 |
| Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada) |
| Docket Number | Div 190 of 2015 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
6 practice notes
-
Carruthers v Carruthers
...Madam Justice Ryan-Froslie In concurrence: The Honourable Madam Justice Schwann The Honourable Mr. Justice Leurer On appeal from: 2019 SKQB 7, Saskatoon Appeal November 30, 2020 Counsel: Benjamin Rakochy for the Appellant Raymond Wiebe and Karyn Kowalski for the Respondent, Robert Brent Car......
-
TYACKE v TYACKE
...Schimelfenig v Schimelfenig, 2014 SKCA 77, [2014] 11 WWR 513; Tether v Tether, 2008 SKCA 126, 56 RFL (6th) 250; Carruthers v Carruthers, 2019 SKQB 7; Stanford v Stanford, 2018 SKQB 221; Thompson v Thompson, 2004 SKQB 100, aff’d 2004 SKCA 169; Welch v Welch, 2001 SKQB 544, 23 RFL (5th) 414; ......
-
Burnouf v Burnouf
...2016 SKQB 275, 21 ETR (4th) 35, rev’d in part 2020 SKCA 61, 59 ETR (4th) 53 (but not on this point), and Carruthers v Carruthers, 2019 SKQB 7 at para 72, aff’d 2021 SKCA 52, 56 RFL (8th) 110, leave to appeal to SCC requested, 39704: albeit, those decisions rested on the c......
-
Suderman v Yakubowski‑Suderman
...hands before then turning to determine what the equalization payment must be. This was done by the trial judge in Carruthers v Carruthers, 2019 SKQB 7 at 65 (Schedule “A”) [Carruthers QB], aff’d 2021 SKCA 52 at para 106, 56 RFL (8th) 110 [Carruthers CA]. In other c......
Get Started for Free
6 cases
-
Carruthers v Carruthers
...Madam Justice Ryan-Froslie In concurrence: The Honourable Madam Justice Schwann The Honourable Mr. Justice Leurer On appeal from: 2019 SKQB 7, Saskatoon Appeal November 30, 2020 Counsel: Benjamin Rakochy for the Appellant Raymond Wiebe and Karyn Kowalski for the Respondent, Robert Brent Car......
-
TYACKE v TYACKE
...Schimelfenig v Schimelfenig, 2014 SKCA 77, [2014] 11 WWR 513; Tether v Tether, 2008 SKCA 126, 56 RFL (6th) 250; Carruthers v Carruthers, 2019 SKQB 7; Stanford v Stanford, 2018 SKQB 221; Thompson v Thompson, 2004 SKQB 100, aff’d 2004 SKCA 169; Welch v Welch, 2001 SKQB 544, 23 RFL (5th) 414; ......
-
Burnouf v Burnouf
...2016 SKQB 275, 21 ETR (4th) 35, rev’d in part 2020 SKCA 61, 59 ETR (4th) 53 (but not on this point), and Carruthers v Carruthers, 2019 SKQB 7 at para 72, aff’d 2021 SKCA 52, 56 RFL (8th) 110, leave to appeal to SCC requested, 39704: albeit, those decisions rested on the c......
-
Suderman v Yakubowski‑Suderman
...hands before then turning to determine what the equalization payment must be. This was done by the trial judge in Carruthers v Carruthers, 2019 SKQB 7 at 65 (Schedule “A”) [Carruthers QB], aff’d 2021 SKCA 52 at para 106, 56 RFL (8th) 110 [Carruthers CA]. In other c......
Get Started for Free