Carten et al. v. Canada et al.,

JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
JudgeGauthier, J.
CourtFederal Court (Canada)
Citation2010 FC 857,[2010] F.T.R. Uned. 785 (FC),[2010] F.T.R. Uned. 785
Date27 August 2010

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
14 practice notes
  • Mancuso et al. v. Canada (Minister of National Health) et al.,
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • January 21, 2014
    ...Ct.), refd to. [para. 19]. Carten et al. v. Canada et al. (2009), 358 F.T.R. 118; 2009 FC 1233 (Protho.), affd. [2010] F.T.R. Uned. 785; 2010 FC 857, refd to. [para. 20]. Simon v. Canada (2011), 410 N.R. 374; 2011 FCA 6, refd to. [para. 20]. Merchant Law Group et al. v. Canada Revenue Agenc......
  • Hughes v. Canada (Human Rights Commission),
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • October 20, 2020
    ...appeal to this Court: see David Suzuki Foundation v. Canada (Health), 2018 FC 379 (Kane, J), at paras 16-19, 36-39, 41; Carten v Canada, 2010 FC 857 (Gauthier, J), at para 23; (v) a number of issues related to an offer letter have been raised by Mr Hughes and determined by this Court, inclu......
  • Jensen v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.,
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • November 5, 2021
    ...allegations which rely upon assumptions and speculations unsupported by material facts cannot be assumed to be true (Carten v Canada, 2010 FC 857 at para 29; Das CA at para 74). Also, the Court is not bound to accept as necessarily true allegations of fact that “are inconsistent with......
  • Gagné v. Canada,
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • April 3, 2013
    ...the jurisprudence thereunder. Such circumstances do not, however, exist in the present case . [Emphasis added] [25] In Carten v Canada , 2010 FC 857 at paras 19, 23-24 (available on CanLII) (available in English only), Justice Gauthier cited James River Corp , above, and explained in which ......
  • Get Started for Free
14 cases
  • Mancuso et al. v. Canada (Minister of National Health) et al.,
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • January 21, 2014
    ...Ct.), refd to. [para. 19]. Carten et al. v. Canada et al. (2009), 358 F.T.R. 118; 2009 FC 1233 (Protho.), affd. [2010] F.T.R. Uned. 785; 2010 FC 857, refd to. [para. 20]. Simon v. Canada (2011), 410 N.R. 374; 2011 FCA 6, refd to. [para. 20]. Merchant Law Group et al. v. Canada Revenue Agenc......
  • Hughes v. Canada (Human Rights Commission),
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • October 20, 2020
    ...appeal to this Court: see David Suzuki Foundation v. Canada (Health), 2018 FC 379 (Kane, J), at paras 16-19, 36-39, 41; Carten v Canada, 2010 FC 857 (Gauthier, J), at para 23; (v) a number of issues related to an offer letter have been raised by Mr Hughes and determined by this Court, inclu......
  • Jensen v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.,
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • November 5, 2021
    ...allegations which rely upon assumptions and speculations unsupported by material facts cannot be assumed to be true (Carten v Canada, 2010 FC 857 at para 29; Das CA at para 74). Also, the Court is not bound to accept as necessarily true allegations of fact that “are inconsistent with......
  • Gagné v. Canada,
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • April 3, 2013
    ...the jurisprudence thereunder. Such circumstances do not, however, exist in the present case . [Emphasis added] [25] In Carten v Canada , 2010 FC 857 at paras 19, 23-24 (available on CanLII) (available in English only), Justice Gauthier cited James River Corp , above, and explained in which ......
  • Get Started for Free