Jensen v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., 2021 FC 1185
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Neutral Citation | 2021 FC 1185 |
| Citation | 2021 FC 1185 |
| Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
| Date | 05 November 2021 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
19 practice notes
-
Price v Smith & Wesson Corporation,
...Hyundai Auto Canada Corp., 2021 ABQB 740, aff'd (on this point) 2023 ABCA 85; Jensen v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., 2023 FCA 89, aff'g 2021 FC 1185; Canada (Attorney General) v. Nasogaluak, 2023 FCA 6; Nissan Canada Inc. v. Mueller, 2022 BCCA 338; Ewert v. Canada (Attorney General), 2022 ......
-
Table of Cases
...108 Jayasekara v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2008 FCA 404 .................. 104, 105 Jensen v Samsung Electronics Co Ltd, 2021 FC 1185 ............................................350, 351 Jiang Guan v Barr, 925 F3d 1022 (9th Circuit, 2010) ..............................................
-
Jensen v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.,
...seek to overturn a decision rendered by Justice Gascon (the Motion Judge) of the Federal Court (Jensen v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., 2021 FC 1185 (Reasons)) denying the certification of a class action. At its core, this appeal raises the issue of a judge’s role in a certification ......
-
The commonality test in class action certification: the battleground of screening merits and fair process
...and return 58 Samsung, above note 21 at para 78 [emphasis added]. See also ibid at para 1. 59 Jensen v Samsung Electronics Co Ltd, 2021 FC 1185 at para 289: “The presence of an express or tacit agreement is the beating heart of the conspiracy provision, even more so with the new section 45 ......
Get Started for Free
15 cases
-
Price v Smith & Wesson Corporation,
...Hyundai Auto Canada Corp., 2021 ABQB 740, aff'd (on this point) 2023 ABCA 85; Jensen v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., 2023 FCA 89, aff'g 2021 FC 1185; Canada (Attorney General) v. Nasogaluak, 2023 FCA 6; Nissan Canada Inc. v. Mueller, 2022 BCCA 338; Ewert v. Canada (Attorney General), 2022 ......
-
Jensen v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.,
...seek to overturn a decision rendered by Justice Gascon (the Motion Judge) of the Federal Court (Jensen v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., 2021 FC 1185 (Reasons)) denying the certification of a class action. At its core, this appeal raises the issue of a judge’s role in a certification ......
-
Doan v. Canada,
...para 3 [Buffalo FCA]). [31] As the parties indicated, and as my colleague Justice Gascon outlined in Jensen v Samsung Electronics Co Ltd, 2021 FC 1185 [Jensen FC] (aff’d in Jensen v Samsung Electronics Co Ltd, 2023 FCA 89), the certification conditions established in Rule 334.16(1) a......
-
Pass Herald Ltd v. Google Llc, 2024 FC 1623
...Jensen v Samsung Electronics Co Ltd, 2023 FCA 89 at para 15 [Jensen FCA] at para 52(b), endorsing Jensen v Samsung Electronics Co Ltd, 2021 FC 1185 [Jensen FC] at paras 81–82. See also L’Oratoire Saint-Joseph du Mont-Royal v JJ, 2019 SCC 35 at paras Where a cause of action advanced is under......
Get Started for Free
1 firm's commentaries
-
More Than 'Symbolic Scrutiny' Federal Court Of Appeal Clarifies Evidentiary Burden And Denies Certification
...are confined solely to the pleadings in determining whether they disclose a reasonable cause of action. Footnotes 1. 2023 FCA 89, aff'g 2021 FC 1185 (Jensen 2. Hazan c. Micron Technology Inc., 2023 QCCA 132 at para 10. 3. Jensen (FC) at para 69. 4. Jensen (FC) at para 147. 5. Jensen (FC) at......
3 books & journal articles
-
Table of Cases
...108 Jayasekara v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2008 FCA 404 .................. 104, 105 Jensen v Samsung Electronics Co Ltd, 2021 FC 1185 ............................................350, 351 Jiang Guan v Barr, 925 F3d 1022 (9th Circuit, 2010) ..............................................
-
The commonality test in class action certification: the battleground of screening merits and fair process
...and return 58 Samsung, above note 21 at para 78 [emphasis added]. See also ibid at para 1. 59 Jensen v Samsung Electronics Co Ltd, 2021 FC 1185 at para 289: “The presence of an express or tacit agreement is the beating heart of the conspiracy provision, even more so with the new section 45 ......
-
The Long Arm of Canadian Price-Fixing Law? Canadian Jurisdiction Over Foreign Price-Fixing Conspiracies
...of bids that are arrived at by arrangement or agreement, agreements not to submit a bid, 11 Jensen v Samsung Electronics Co Ltd , 2021 FC 1185 at para 103 [ Jensen ]. 12 Ibid at para 96. 350 The Long Arm of Canadian Price-Fixing Law? and agreements to withdraw a bid that has been submitted.......