CAS v NPC, 2020 ABQB 421
| Judge | Honourable Mr. Justice M. J. Lema |
| Citation | 2020 ABQB 421 |
| Docket Number | 4803 190725 |
| Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada) |
| Date | 21 July 2020 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
8 practice notes
-
Parenting Arrangements After Divorce
...a detailed non-exhaustive list of factors favouring shared parenting and of factors signalling against shared parenting, see CAS v NPC, 2020 ABQB 421 at paras 9–10, Lema J. 89 CAKS v NPAC, 2020 ABQB 421; Matthews v Taylor, 2012 NLTD(G) 24; SB v TO, 2013 NSSC 243; MacNutt v MacNutt, 2013 NSS......
-
Gunston v MacDonald,
...the days that she attended this trial. [94] Mr. Gunston referred to the decision in CAS v NPC, 2020 ABQB 421, for the factors to be considered on a parenting application. Before his list of factors, at paras 5 to 8, Lema J set the stage for the disc......
-
Chiveldave v Chiveldave,
...by the trial judge. [paras 5-7] [emphasis added] [41] See also CAS v NPC, 2020 ABQB 421: The mother and father both referred to various discussions, including tentative arrangements (or at least understandings of such arrangements)......
-
FAMILY | When is Shared Parenting Appropriate?
..."precedent" that other judges apply to subsequent cases. Recently, Justice Lema of the Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (in CAS v NPC, 2020 ABQB 421) reviewed the Alberta caselaw regarding factors that tended to support an order of shared parenting and those factors that tended to demonstr......
Request a trial to view additional results
6 cases
-
Gunston v MacDonald,
...the days that she attended this trial. [94] Mr. Gunston referred to the decision in CAS v NPC, 2020 ABQB 421, for the factors to be considered on a parenting application. Before his list of factors, at paras 5 to 8, Lema J set the stage for the disc......
-
Chiveldave v Chiveldave,
...by the trial judge. [paras 5-7] [emphasis added] [41] See also CAS v NPC, 2020 ABQB 421: The mother and father both referred to various discussions, including tentative arrangements (or at least understandings of such arrangements)......
-
Brown v Sutherland,
...that this is what determines in this particular case. For a thorough review of the best interests’ analysis, see CAS v NPC, 2020 ABQB 421 and Gordon v Shumka, 2016 ABPC 114. [145] This Court has thoroughly considered the s 18 FLA factors. It is the childȁ......
-
JEB v JS, 2020 ABQB 437
...to the factors supporting shared parenting. In accordance with Lema J’s recent comprehensive review of the jurisprudence in CAS v NPC, 2020 ABQB 421 at paras 9-10, I find the following factors apply in this case: · Both parties are capable and engaged parents; I am impressed by the consiste......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
-
Parenting Arrangements After Divorce
...a detailed non-exhaustive list of factors favouring shared parenting and of factors signalling against shared parenting, see CAS v NPC, 2020 ABQB 421 at paras 9–10, Lema J. 89 CAKS v NPAC, 2020 ABQB 421; Matthews v Taylor, 2012 NLTD(G) 24; SB v TO, 2013 NSSC 243; MacNutt v MacNutt, 2013 NSS......
-
FAMILY | When is Shared Parenting Appropriate?
..."precedent" that other judges apply to subsequent cases. Recently, Justice Lema of the Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (in CAS v NPC, 2020 ABQB 421) reviewed the Alberta caselaw regarding factors that tended to support an order of shared parenting and those factors that tended to demonstr......