Cellular Baby Cell Phones Accessories Specialist Ltd. v. Fido Solutions Inc., 2017 BCCA 50

JudgeThe Honourable Mr. Justice Donald; The Honourable Mr. Justice Goepel; The Honourable Mr. Justice Fitch
CourtCourt of Appeal (British Columbia)
Case DateFebruary 02, 2017
JurisdictionBritish Columbia
Citations2017 BCCA 50
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
14 practice notes
  • Remington Development Corporation v Canadian Pacific Railway Company,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • October 20, 2022
    ...and 9th Ave Lands pending the resolution of this litigation: Cellular Baby Cell Phones Accessories Specialist Ltd v Fido Solutions Inc, 2017 BCCA 50 at paras 80-81. [1173]   Steps that Remington has taken in 2021 with EllisDon, which is considering developing a train station on th......
  • DHMK Properties Inc. v. 2296608 Ontario Inc., 2017 ONSC 2432
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • April 20, 2017
    ...Controller, [1922] 1 K.B. 127 (C.A.) at pp. 140-141; Cellular Baby Cell Phones Accessories Specialist Ltd. v. Fido Solutions Inc., 2017 BCCA 50. [75] In the immediate case, it was eminently reasonable for DHMK to decline to accept the Mund Group’s offer to reinstate and complete the transac......
  • Richmont Mines Inc. v. Teck Resources Limited, 2018 BCCA 452
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • November 30, 2018
    ...para. 76; Hadley Estate (Re), 2017 BCCA 311 at paras. 31–32; Cellular Baby Cell Phones Accessories Specialist Ltd. v. Fido Solutions Inc., 2017 BCCA 50 at para. 48; Wynward Insurance Group v. MS Developments Inc., 2016 BCCA 513 at para. 16; and Coast Capital Savings Credit Union v. Liberty ......
  • Kaur v. Bajwa,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • November 9, 2020
    ...Inc. v. 0915630 B.C. Ltd., 2014 BCCA 425 at para. 38; Cellular Baby Cell Phones Accessories Specialist Ltd. v. Fido Solutions Inc., 2017 BCCA 50 at paras. [29] The onus is on an innocent party to establish that it has accepted a repudiation of a contract and that it has communicated that ac......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
12 cases
  • Remington Development Corporation v Canadian Pacific Railway Company,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • October 20, 2022
    ...and 9th Ave Lands pending the resolution of this litigation: Cellular Baby Cell Phones Accessories Specialist Ltd v Fido Solutions Inc, 2017 BCCA 50 at paras 80-81. [1173]   Steps that Remington has taken in 2021 with EllisDon, which is considering developing a train station on th......
  • DHMK Properties Inc. v. 2296608 Ontario Inc., 2017 ONSC 2432
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • April 20, 2017
    ...Controller, [1922] 1 K.B. 127 (C.A.) at pp. 140-141; Cellular Baby Cell Phones Accessories Specialist Ltd. v. Fido Solutions Inc., 2017 BCCA 50. [75] In the immediate case, it was eminently reasonable for DHMK to decline to accept the Mund Group’s offer to reinstate and complete the transac......
  • Richmont Mines Inc. v. Teck Resources Limited, 2018 BCCA 452
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • November 30, 2018
    ...para. 76; Hadley Estate (Re), 2017 BCCA 311 at paras. 31–32; Cellular Baby Cell Phones Accessories Specialist Ltd. v. Fido Solutions Inc., 2017 BCCA 50 at para. 48; Wynward Insurance Group v. MS Developments Inc., 2016 BCCA 513 at para. 16; and Coast Capital Savings Credit Union v. Liberty ......
  • Kaur v. Bajwa,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • November 9, 2020
    ...Inc. v. 0915630 B.C. Ltd., 2014 BCCA 425 at para. 38; Cellular Baby Cell Phones Accessories Specialist Ltd. v. Fido Solutions Inc., 2017 BCCA 50 at paras. [29] The onus is on an innocent party to establish that it has accepted a repudiation of a contract and that it has communicated that ac......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 firm's commentaries

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT