Combined Air Mechanical Services Inc. et al. v. Flesch et al.,

JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
JudgeMcLachlin, C.J.C., LeBel, Abella, Rothstein, Cromwell, Karakatsanis and Wagner, JJ.
Citation[2014] N.R. TBEd. JA.013,2014 SCC 8,[2014] 1 SCR 126,37 RPR (5th) 63,453 NR 101,366 DLR (4th) 671,[2014] SCJ No 8 (QL),314 OAC 49
CourtSupreme Court (Canada)
Date23 January 2014

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
440 practice notes
  • Eisenberg v. Toronto (City)
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • December 16, 2019
    ...(Trustee of) v. Kinross Gold Corp., 2014 ONCA 901 at para. 125; AIC Limited v. Fischer, 2013 SCC 69 at paras. 27-38. [33] 2014 SCC 7. [34] 2014 SCC 8. [35] Marcantonio v. TVI Pacific Inc., [2009] O.J. No. 3409 (S.C.J.) at para. 9; Silver v. IMAX Corp., [2009] O.J. No. 5585 at paras. 215-216......
  • Bhasin v. Hrynew
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • November 13, 2014
    ...Co. of Canada, [1991] 2 S.C.R. 50; Parna v. G. & S. Properties Ltd., [1971] S.C.R. 306; Bruno Appliance and Furniture, Inc. v. Hryniak, 2014 SCC 8, [2014] 1 S.C.R. 126; LeMesurier v. Andrus (1986), 54 O.R. (2d) 1; Shell Oil Co. v. Marinello, 294 A.2d 253 (1972), aff’d 307 A.2d 598 (1973......
  • Stoney Tribal Council v Canadian Pacific Railway, 2017 ABCA 432
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • December 18, 2017
    ...194 (Ontario Rules or Rules) to increase access to justice. This appeal, and its companion, Bruno Appliance and Furniture, Inc. v. Hryniak, 2014 SCC 8 (CanLII), [2014] 1 S.C.R. 126, address the proper interpretation of the amended Rule 20 (summary judgment motion).[4] In interpreting these ......
  • Karahalios v. Conservative Party of Canada
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • May 20, 2020
    ...5720 at para. 24. [12] Carevest Capital Inc. v. North Tech Electronics Ltd., 2010 ONSC 1290 at para. 16 (Div. Ct.). [13] 2014 SCC 7. [14] 2014 SCC 8. [15] Campana v. The City of Mississauga, 2016 ONSC 3421; Ghaeinizadeh (Litigation guardian of) v. Garfinkle Biderman LLP, 2014 ONSC 4994, lea......
  • Get Started for Free
383 cases
  • Soliman v. Bordman,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • October 21, 2021
    ...Restaurants Inc. (1994), 18 O.R. (3d) 481 (C.A.). [11] Toronto-Dominion Bank v. 466888 Ontario Ltd., 2010 ONSC 3798. [12] 2014 SCC 7. [13] 2014 SCC 8. [14] Campana v. The City of Mississauga, 2016 ONSC 3421; Ghaeinizadeh (Litigation guardian of) v. Garfinkle Biderman LLP, 2014 ONSC 4994, le......
  • Eisenberg v. Toronto (City),
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • December 16, 2019
    ...(Trustee of) v. Kinross Gold Corp., 2014 ONCA 901 at para. 125; AIC Limited v. Fischer, 2013 SCC 69 at paras. 27-38. [33] 2014 SCC 7. [34] 2014 SCC 8. [35] Marcantonio v. TVI Pacific Inc., [2009] O.J. No. 3409 (S.C.J.) at para. 9; Silver v. IMAX Corp., [2009] O.J. No. 5585 at paras. 215-216......
  • Bhasin v. Hrynew,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • November 13, 2014
    ...Co. of Canada, [1991] 2 S.C.R. 50; Parna v. G. & S. Properties Ltd., [1971] S.C.R. 306; Bruno Appliance and Furniture, Inc. v. Hryniak, 2014 SCC 8, [2014] 1 S.C.R. 126; LeMesurier v. Andrus (1986), 54 O.R. (2d) 1; Shell Oil Co. v. Marinello, 294 A.2d 253 (1972), aff’d 307 A.2d 598 (1973......
  • Stoney Tribal Council v Canadian Pacific Railway, 2017 ABCA 432
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • December 18, 2017
    ...194 (Ontario Rules or Rules) to increase access to justice. This appeal, and its companion, Bruno Appliance and Furniture, Inc. v. Hryniak, 2014 SCC 8 (CanLII), [2014] 1 S.C.R. 126, address the proper interpretation of the amended Rule 20 (summary judgment motion).[4] In interpreting these ......
  • Get Started for Free
24 firm's commentaries
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (January 23 ' 27, 2023)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • January 31, 2023
    ...2012 ONLSHP 0180, Law Society of Upper Canada v. Oscar Choi-Wah Wong, 2013 ONLSAP 0031, Bruno Appliance and Furniture, Inc. v. Hryniak, 2014 SCC 8, F.H. v. McDougall, 2008 SCC 53, R. v. G.F., 2021 SCC 20, R. v. Dinardo, 2008 SCC 24 Benbella v. The National Dental Examining Board of Canada ,......
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (October 20 ' 24, 2025)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • October 28, 2025
    ...Misrepresentation, Conversion, Unjust Enrichment, Civil Procedure, Summary Judgement, Bruno Appliance and Furniture Inc. v. Hryniak, 2014 SCC 8, HSBC v. Guido, 2025 ONCA 684 Amiri v. Nazer, 2025 ONCA 726 Keywords: Family Law, Property, Marriage Contracts, Dowry, Support, Imputing Income, Re......
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (December 27-31, 2021)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • January 4, 2022
    ...Inc., 2021 SCC 53, Ste. Rose & District Cattle Feeders Co-op v. Geisel, 2010 MBCA 52, Bruno Appliance and Furniture, Inc. v. Hryniak, 2014 SCC 8, Simone v. Daley (1999), 43 O.R. (3d) 511, Fiorito v. Wiggins, 2017 ONCA 765, Elmer Driedger, Construction of Statutes, 2nd ed. (Toronto, Ont.: Bu......
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (December 27-31, 2021)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • January 4, 2022
    ...Inc., 2021 SCC 53, Ste. Rose & District Cattle Feeders Co-op v. Geisel, 2010 MBCA 52, Bruno Appliance and Furniture, Inc. v. Hryniak, 2014 SCC 8, Simone v. Daley (1999), 43 O.R. (3d) 511, Fiorito v. Wiggins, 2017 ONCA 765, Elmer Driedger, Construction of Statutes, 2nd ed. (Toronto, Ont.: Bu......
  • Get Started for Free
24 books & journal articles
  • Book Review: Defending Class Actions in Canada: A Guide for Defendants
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Canadian Class Action Review No. 16-2, March 2021
    • March 1, 2021
    ...basis.98 However, these cases should not be read as foreclosing inferred reliance, as they 92 Bruno Appliance and Furniture Inc v Hryniak, 2014 SCC 8 at para 21. 93 Carom v Bre-X Minerals Ltd, [1998] OJ No 4496, 27 CPC (4th) 73 (SC) [Bre-X] at para 40 (where the court found that adopting th......
  • Flash Boys Class Actions: Civil Fraud, Conspiracy, and the Certifiability of High-frequency Trading Cases in Canada
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Canadian Class Action Review No. 16-2, March 2021
    • March 1, 2021
    ...basis.98 However, these cases should not be read as foreclosing inferred reliance, as they 92 Bruno Appliance and Furniture Inc v Hryniak, 2014 SCC 8 at para 21. 93 Carom v Bre-X Minerals Ltd, [1998] OJ No 4496, 27 CPC (4th) 73 (SC) [Bre-X] at para 40 (where the court found that adopting th......
  • An Overview of Class Actions and Covid-19 in Ontario’s Long-term Care Facilities
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Canadian Class Action Review No. 16-2, March 2021
    • March 1, 2021
    ...basis.98 However, these cases should not be read as foreclosing inferred reliance, as they 92 Bruno Appliance and Furniture Inc v Hryniak, 2014 SCC 8 at para 21. 93 Carom v Bre-X Minerals Ltd, [1998] OJ No 4496, 27 CPC (4th) 73 (SC) [Bre-X] at para 40 (where the court found that adopting th......
  • The Unworkability of the Workable Methodology Standard
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Canadian Class Action Review No. 16-2, March 2021
    • March 1, 2021
    ...basis.98 However, these cases should not be read as foreclosing inferred reliance, as they 92 Bruno Appliance and Furniture Inc v Hryniak, 2014 SCC 8 at para 21. 93 Carom v Bre-X Minerals Ltd, [1998] OJ No 4496, 27 CPC (4th) 73 (SC) [Bre-X] at para 40 (where the court found that adopting th......
  • Get Started for Free