Condon et al. v. Canada, (2015) 474 N.R. 300 (FCA)
| Judge | Ryer, Webb and Near, JJ.A. |
| Court | Federal Court of Appeal (Canada) |
| Case Date | February 19, 2015 |
| Jurisdiction | Canada (Federal) |
| Citations | (2015), 474 N.R. 300 (FCA);2015 FCA 159 |
Condon v. Can. (2015), 474 N.R. 300 (FCA)
MLB headnote and full text
[French language version follows English language version]
[La version française vient à la suite de la version anglaise]
Temp. Cite: [2015] N.R. TBEd. JL.008
Gaelen Patrick Condon, Rebecca Walker and Angela Piggott (appellants) v. Her Majesty the Queen (respondent)
(A-165-14; 2015 FCA 159; 2015 CAF 159)
Indexed As: Condon et al. v. Canada
Federal Court of Appeal
Ryer, Webb and Near, JJ.A.
July 6, 2015.
Summary:
The Minister of Human Resources and Skills Development Canada was responsible for the Canada Student Loans Program. In 2012, the Minister lost an external hard drive containing personal information about the three named plaintiffs as well as approximately 583,000 other individuals. That personal information included the names, dates of birth, addresses, student loan balances, and Social Insurance Numbers of those individuals. The hard drive was never recovered. The plaintiffs alleged several faults and breaches on the part of the Minister and sought to recover damages suffered as a result of the data loss. The plaintiffs brought a motion to certify an action as a class proceeding (Federal Courts Rules, rule 334.16) against Her Majesty the Queen, named as representative of the Minister. The Minister argued, inter alia, that a class proceeding was not the preferable procedure and that the plaintiffs had suffered no compensable damages.
The Federal Court, in a decision reported 450 F.T.R. 216, granted the motion and certified the action as a class proceeding, but only in relation to certain claims being made by the plaintiffs. The plaintiffs appealed, arguing that their claims for negligence and breach of confidence should also be included as part of the class proceeding.
The Federal Court of Appeal allowed the appeal and and referred the matter back to the Federal Court to include the claims for negligence and breach of confidence in the nature of the claims asserted on behalf of the class as defined by the Federal Court judge and to determine the common questions in the class proceeding in relation to the claims for negligence and breach of confidence.
Practice - Topic 208
Persons who can sue and be sued - Individuals and corporations - Status or standing - Class or representative actions - For damages - [See Practice - Topic 209.3 ].
Practice - Topic 209.3
Persons who can sue and be sued - Individuals and corporations - Status or standing - Class or representative actions - Certification - Considerations (incl. when class action appropriate) - Whether pleadings disclose a reasonable cause of action - The Minister responsible for the Canada Student Loans Program lost an external hard drive containing personal information about approximately 583,000 individuals (including the plaintiffs) - The plaintiffs moved to certify a class action, alleging negligence and breach of confidence - The Federal Court held that it was plain and obvious the claims would fail for lack of compensable damages - The plaintiffs appealed - The Federal Court of Appeal allowed the appeal - The Federal Court judge erred in law in evaluating the merits of the claims based on the evidence submitted by the parties (i.e., no evidence was to be submitted at the hearing of this type of motion) - The judge also erred and in failing to address the plaintiffs' claims for special damages for "costs incurred in preventing identity theft" and "out-of-pocket expenses" in her analysis - See paragraphs 9 to 23.
Practice - Topic 210.5
Persons who can sue and be sued - Individuals and corporations - Status or standing - Class or representative actions - Procedure - Pre-certification matters (incl. particulars, production, pleadings, etc.) - [See Practice - Topic 209.3 ].
Practice - Topic 1458
Pleadings - Statement of claim - General - Necessity of claiming damages or relief - The Federal Court of Appeal stated that with respect to damages, the Federal Courts Rules (rule 182) required only that the claim specify the nature of the damages claimed - The court noted that a general description of the nature of the damages claimed was sufficient in Brazeau v. Canada (FC 2012) to deny a motion to strike that part of the pleadings related to a negligence claim - See paragraph 20.
Cases Noticed:
Housen v. Nikolaisen et al., [2002] 2 S.C.R. 235; 286 N.R. 1; 219 Sask.R. 1; 272 W.A.C. 1; 2002 SCC 33, refd to. [para. 7].
Manuge v. Canada (2008), 329 F.T.R. 167; 2008 FC 624, refd to. [para. 9].
Pro-Sys Consultants Ltd. v. Infineon Technologies AG et al. (2009), 277 B.C.A.C. 271; 469 W.A.C. 271; 98 B.C.L.R.(4th) 272; 2009 BCCA 503, refd to. [para. 10].
Hunt v. T & N plc et al., [1990] 2 S.C.R. 959; 117 N.R. 321, refd to. [para. 11].
R. v. Imperial Tobacco Canada Ltd. - see British Columbia v. Imperial Tobacco Canada Ltd. et al.
British Columbia v. Imperial Tobacco Canada Ltd. et al. (2011), 419 N.R. 1; 308 B.C.A.C. 1; 521 W.A.C. 1; 2011 SCC 42, refd to. [para. 12].
Brazeau et al. v. Canada, [2012] F.T.R. Uned. 660; 2012 FC 648, refd to. [para. 19].
Biladeau v. Ontario (Attorney General) (2014), 328 O.A.C. 180; 2014 ONCA 848, refd to. [para. 21].
Statutes Noticed:
Federal Courts Rules (1998), rule 334.16(1)(a) [para. 9]; rule 174, rule 182 [para. 19].
Counsel:
Ted Charney and Samantha Schreiber, for the appellants;
Catharine Moore and Natalie Haman, for the respondent.
Solicitors of Record:
Charney Lawyers, Toronto, Ontario, for the appellants;
William F. Pentney, Deputy Attorney General of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, for the respondent.
This appeal was heard in Toronto, Ontario, on February 19, 2015, before Ryer, Webb and Near, JJ.A., of the Federal Court of Appeal. The following decision was delivered in Ottawa, Ontario, on July 6, 2015, for the court, by Webb, J.A.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Del Giudice v. Thompson,
... 2019 QCCS 4340 ; Bourbonnière c. Yahoo! Inc. 2019 QCCS 2624 ; Condon v. Canada, 2014 FC 250 , var’d on other grounds 2015 FCA 159; Mazzonna c. DaimlerChrysler Financial Services Canada Inc. 2012 QCCS 958 ; Saadati v. Moorhead, 2017 SCC 28 ; Mustapha v. Culligan of Canada Lt......
-
Book Review: The Class Actions Controversy: The Origins and Development of the Ontario Class Proceedings Act By Suzanne Chiodo
...evidence to prove actual wasted time or inconvenience caused by the breach.14 Precedent-setting, this is Canada’s first privacy 10 2015 FCA 159 [Condon]. 11 Two privacy-breach class actions were certified in 2015 against the Government of Canada: Condon, ibid, and John Doe v Canada, 2015 FC......
-
Judicial Scrutiny of Third Party Litigation Funding Agreements in Canadian Class Actions
...evidence to prove actual wasted time or inconvenience caused by the breach.14 Precedent-setting, this is Canada’s first privacy 10 2015 FCA 159 [Condon]. 11 Two privacy-breach class actions were certified in 2015 against the Government of Canada: Condon, ibid, and John Doe v Canada, 2015 FC......
-
Introduction
...evidence to prove actual wasted time or inconvenience caused by the breach.14 Precedent-setting, this is Canada’s first privacy 10 2015 FCA 159 [Condon]. 11 Two privacy-breach class actions were certified in 2015 against the Government of Canada: Condon, ibid, and John Doe v Canada, 2015 FC......
-
Del Giudice v. Thompson, 2021 ONSC 5379
... 2019 QCCS 4340 ; Bourbonnière c. Yahoo! Inc. 2019 QCCS 2624 ; Condon v. Canada, 2014 FC 250 , var’d on other grounds 2015 FCA 159; Mazzonna c. DaimlerChrysler Financial Services Canada Inc. 2012 QCCS 958 ; Saadati v. Moorhead, 2017 SCC 28 ; Mustapha v. Culligan of Canada Lt......
-
Kang v MB, 2019 ABQB 246
...recognition of a common law tort for breach of privacy: Jones v Tsige, 2012 ONCA 32; Condon v Canada, 2014 FC 250 at paras 52-64, varied 2015 FCA 159. On the other hand, some courts have held that there is no independent cause of action for breach of privacy rights outside of legislation: A......
-
Jensen v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., 2023 FCA 89
...overriding error: see John Doe at paras. 29-31; Horseman v. Canada, 2016 FCA 238 , 271 A.C.W.S. (3d) 707 at para. 4; Condon v. Canada, 2015 FCA 159, [2015] F.C.J. No 803 (QL) at para. 7 [Condon]. A. Did the Motion Judge err in finding that the statement of claim does not plead a reason......
-
John Doe et al. v. Canada, (2016) 486 N.R. 223 (FCA)
...that this is the standard applied by this Court in dealing with an order certifying an action as a class proceeding: see Condon v. Canada, 2015 FCA 159, [2015] F.C.J. No. 803 , at para. 7 [32] As a result, a standard of correctness will be applied to questions B and C, whereas questions D ......
-
Canadian Internet Law Update - 2015
...that the forum selection clause should be enforced and the action stayed. Proposed Class Action for Breach of Privacy Condon v. Canada, 2015 FCA 159, involved an application for certification of a class proceeding arising from the loss of a computer hard drive containing the personal inform......
-
Developments In Cyber Risk
...Court certified a class action in Condon v. Canada, 2014 FC 250 partly on the basis of intrusion upon seclusion. (In Condon v. Canada, 2015 FCA 159, the Federal Court of Appeal later allowed an appeal and referred the matter back to the Federal Court to include claims for negligence and bre......
-
Defence + Indemnity - April 2020: Case Summary: Li c. Equifax Inc.
...Canada Inc., 2012 QCCS 958; Rowlands v. Durham Region Health, 2012 ONSC 3948; Evans v. Bank of Nova Scotia, 2014 ONSC 7249; Condon v. R.; 2015 FCA 159; Lozanski v. Home Depot Inc., 2016 ONSC 5447; Bourbonnière c. Yahoo! Inc., 2019 CarswellQue 5830 Brian Vail function JDS_LoadEvent(func) { v......
-
Case Summary: Li C. Equifax Inc.
...Canada Inc., 2012 QCCS 958; Rowlands v. Durham Region Health, 2012 ONSC 3948; Evans v. Bank of Nova Scotia, 2014 ONSC 7249; Condon v. R.; 2015 FCA 159; Lozanski v. Home Depot Inc., 2016 ONSC 5447; Bourbonnière c. Yahoo! Inc., 2019 CarswellQue 5830 The content of this article is intended to ......
-
Book Review: The Class Actions Controversy: The Origins and Development of the Ontario Class Proceedings Act By Suzanne Chiodo
...evidence to prove actual wasted time or inconvenience caused by the breach.14 Precedent-setting, this is Canada’s first privacy 10 2015 FCA 159 [Condon]. 11 Two privacy-breach class actions were certified in 2015 against the Government of Canada: Condon, ibid, and John Doe v Canada, 2015 FC......
-
Judicial Scrutiny of Third Party Litigation Funding Agreements in Canadian Class Actions
...evidence to prove actual wasted time or inconvenience caused by the breach.14 Precedent-setting, this is Canada’s first privacy 10 2015 FCA 159 [Condon]. 11 Two privacy-breach class actions were certified in 2015 against the Government of Canada: Condon, ibid, and John Doe v Canada, 2015 FC......
-
Introduction
...evidence to prove actual wasted time or inconvenience caused by the breach.14 Precedent-setting, this is Canada’s first privacy 10 2015 FCA 159 [Condon]. 11 Two privacy-breach class actions were certified in 2015 against the Government of Canada: Condon, ibid, and John Doe v Canada, 2015 FC......
-
The Fourth Dimension to Class Actions: Access to a Meaningful Benefit
...evidence to prove actual wasted time or inconvenience caused by the breach.14 Precedent-setting, this is Canada’s first privacy 10 2015 FCA 159 [Condon]. 11 Two privacy-breach class actions were certified in 2015 against the Government of Canada: Condon, ibid, and John Doe v Canada, 2015 FC......