Constantini (C.B.) Ltd. v. Slozka et al., 2007 BCSC 615

JudgeMacKenzie, J.
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
Case DateMarch 22, 2007
JurisdictionBritish Columbia
Citations2007 BCSC 615;[2007] B.C.T.C. Uned. 317 (SC);[2007] B.C.T.C. Uned. 317
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
3 practice notes
  • McDaniel v. McDaniel et al., [2008] B.C.T.C. Uned. C16
    • Canada
    • British Columbia Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • April 30, 2008
    ...undertaking to pay damages rather than an implied undertaking with respect to discovery information in C.B. Constantini Ltd. v. Slozka , 2007 BCSC 615, what she said at para. 91 of her judgment is equally applicable to the undertaking I am considering in this case: The undertaking as to dam......
  • Micka v. Oliver & District Community Economic Development Society et al., [2009] B.C.T.C. Uned. 678
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • May 21, 2009
    ...have taken into consideration that Mr. Micka was representing himself. However as Mackenzie J. noted in C.B. Constantini Ltd v. Slozka , 2007 BCSC 615 at para. 109: The court will extend latitude to parties who appear in person, but when other parties are being prejudiced, it is important t......
  • Alexis v. Drury et al., [2013] B.C.T.C. Uned. 2157
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • November 27, 2013
    ...the amendments a nullity. [24] Counsel for Mr. Duncan also drew my attention to the more recent case of C.B. Constantini Ltd. v. Slozka , 2007 BCSC 615, where this court confirmed the following at para. 83: [83] The addition of parties is governed by Rule 15(5) [now Rule 6-2(7)]. If court a......
3 cases
  • McDaniel v. McDaniel et al., [2008] B.C.T.C. Uned. C16
    • Canada
    • British Columbia Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • April 30, 2008
    ...undertaking to pay damages rather than an implied undertaking with respect to discovery information in C.B. Constantini Ltd. v. Slozka , 2007 BCSC 615, what she said at para. 91 of her judgment is equally applicable to the undertaking I am considering in this case: The undertaking as to dam......
  • Micka v. Oliver & District Community Economic Development Society et al., [2009] B.C.T.C. Uned. 678
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • May 21, 2009
    ...have taken into consideration that Mr. Micka was representing himself. However as Mackenzie J. noted in C.B. Constantini Ltd v. Slozka , 2007 BCSC 615 at para. 109: The court will extend latitude to parties who appear in person, but when other parties are being prejudiced, it is important t......
  • Alexis v. Drury et al., [2013] B.C.T.C. Uned. 2157
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • November 27, 2013
    ...the amendments a nullity. [24] Counsel for Mr. Duncan also drew my attention to the more recent case of C.B. Constantini Ltd. v. Slozka , 2007 BCSC 615, where this court confirmed the following at para. 83: [83] The addition of parties is governed by Rule 15(5) [now Rule 6-2(7)]. If court a......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT