Coquitlam (City) v. Crawford, [2007] B.C.T.C. Uned. B20

JudgeRomilly, J.
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
Case DateJanuary 31, 2007
JurisdictionBritish Columbia
Citations[2007] B.C.T.C. Uned. B20;2007 BCSC 146
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
3 practice notes
  • Sunshine Coast (Regional District) v. Sheppard et al., [2007] B.C.T.C. Uned. G78
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • December 6, 2007
    ...principles that are necessarily attached to an overbreadth analysis. This approach was rejected in Coquitlam (City) v. Crawford et al., 2007 BCSC 146, 31 M.P.L.R. (4th) 73, where the court engaged in a full Charter analysis of a noise bylaw and unequivocally found the noise bylaw constituti......
  • Salt Spring Island Rod and Gun Club v. Capital Regional District, [2013] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1612
    • Canada
    • British Columbia Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • September 3, 2013
    ...the discharge of firearms that do not create noise. [36] Romilly J.'s comments about a dog kennel in Coquitlam (City) v. Crawford et al , 2007 BCSC 146 at para. 5, could well apply to the operation of a gun club: ... There is also no suggestion that when the City permitted the commercial ke......
  • Coquitlam (City) v. Crawford, [2008] B.C.T.C. Uned. 630 (SC)
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • July 28, 2008
    ...Romilly briefly disposed of the s. 7 argument and ordered a trial on the issue of whether the respondents are in breach of the bylaws (2007 BCSC 146). THE NOISE BYLAW [3] Section A of the Noise Bylaw defines "noise" as follows: 'Noise' includes any loud outcry, clamour, shouting or movement......
3 cases
  • Sunshine Coast (Regional District) v. Sheppard et al., [2007] B.C.T.C. Uned. G78
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • December 6, 2007
    ...principles that are necessarily attached to an overbreadth analysis. This approach was rejected in Coquitlam (City) v. Crawford et al., 2007 BCSC 146, 31 M.P.L.R. (4th) 73, where the court engaged in a full Charter analysis of a noise bylaw and unequivocally found the noise bylaw constituti......
  • Salt Spring Island Rod and Gun Club v. Capital Regional District, [2013] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1612
    • Canada
    • British Columbia Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • September 3, 2013
    ...the discharge of firearms that do not create noise. [36] Romilly J.'s comments about a dog kennel in Coquitlam (City) v. Crawford et al , 2007 BCSC 146 at para. 5, could well apply to the operation of a gun club: ... There is also no suggestion that when the City permitted the commercial ke......
  • Coquitlam (City) v. Crawford, [2008] B.C.T.C. Uned. 630 (SC)
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • July 28, 2008
    ...Romilly briefly disposed of the s. 7 argument and ordered a trial on the issue of whether the respondents are in breach of the bylaws (2007 BCSC 146). THE NOISE BYLAW [3] Section A of the Noise Bylaw defines "noise" as follows: 'Noise' includes any loud outcry, clamour, shouting or movement......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT