Crossroads-DMD Mortgage Investment Corp. v. Gauthier, [2015] A.R. TBEd. NO.055
Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada) |
Case Date | November 06, 2015 |
Citations | [2015] A.R. TBEd. NO.055;2015 ABQB 703 |
Crossroads-DMD Mortgage v. Gauthier, [2015] A.R. TBEd. NO.055
MLB being edited
Currently being edited for A.R. - judgment temporarily in rough form.
Temp. Cite: [2015] A.R. TBEd. NO.055
Crossroads-DMD Mortgage Investment Corp. (plaintiff) v. Adam Christian Gauthier (defendant)
(1503 14455; 2015 ABQB 703)
Indexed As: Crossroads-DMD Mortgage Investment Corp. v. Gauthier
Alberta Court of Queen's Bench
Judicial District of Edmonton
Schulz, Master
November 6, 2015.
Summary:
The plaintiff second mortgagee ("Crossroads") alleged that the defendant mortgagor ("Gauthier") was in default of the second mortgage. Crossroads sued Gauthier and applied for a one day redemption order.
A Master of the Alberta Court of Queen's Bench granted a 30 day redemption order, following which Crossroads could list the property for sale for 60 days at $372,000 or such higher sum as the listing realtor might recommend. Costs were awarded on a solicitor-client indemnity basis. Crossroads could submit the order directly to the court for signature without first obtaining Gauthier's approval as to its form.
Courts - Topic 10
Stare decisis - Authority of judicial decisions - General principles - What constitutes obiter dictum - See paragraphs 32 and 33.
Courts - Topic 121
Stare decisis - Authority of judicial decisions - Courts of superior jurisdiction - See paragraphs 33 to 35.
Courts - Topic 554.1
Judges - Powers - To control "organized pseudolegal commercial argument" litigants - See paragraphs 19 to 48 and 97 to 104.
Mortgages - Topic 5520.1
Mortgage actions - Action for foreclosure and sale - Defences - See paragraphs 1 to 104.
Negotiable Instruments - Topic 2502
Bills of exchange - General principles - What constitutes - See paragraphs 52 to 67.
Practice - Topic 1308.3
Pleadings - Use of party's name in pleadings - See paragraph 100.
Counsel:
J. Blanchard (Hendrix Law), for the plaintiff;
Adam Christian Gauthier was self-represented.
This application was heard by Schulz, Master, of the Alberta Court of Queen's Bench,
Judicial District of Edmonton, who delivered the following decision on November 6, 2015.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Potvin (Re), 2018 ABQB 652
...v Envision Credit Union, 2006 BCSC 750 at paras 27, 39, 151 ACWS (3d) 204; Crossroads-DMD Mortgage Investment Corporation v Gauthier, 2015 ABQB 703 at paras 68-85, 28 Alta LR (6th) 104; and Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce v McDougald, at paras 51-53. [95] This anti-banking conspiracy the......
-
d’Abadie v Her Majesty the Queen, 2018 ABQB 298
...ABCA 14; Rothweiler v Payette, 2018 ABQB 134. As Master Schulz observed in Crossroads-DMD Mortgage Investment Corporation v Gauthier, 2015 ABQB 703 at para 41, 28 Alta LR (6th) 104, “... The “Strawman” is therefore not merely a myth. It is litigation poison. [70] I conclude that d’Abadie’s ......
-
Scotia Mortgage Corporation v. Landry, 2018 ABQB 951
...of bad faith, abusive litigation: Fiander v Mills, at paras 21, 37-40; Crossroads-DMD Mortgage Investment Corporation v Gauthier, 2015 ABQB 703 at para 47, 28 Alta LR (6th) 104; Pomerleau v Canada (Revenue Agency), at para 73; Rothweiler v Payette, 2018 ABQB 399 at para 27; d’Abadie v Her M......
-
ATB Financial v Dimsdale Auto Parts Ltd,
...Rights and Freedoms: O'Brien v Murchland, 2013 ONSC 4576; Girard at para 11; Crossroads-DMD Mortgage Investment Corporation v Gauthier, 2015 ABQB 703 at paras 86-89; Pearce v Canada, 2016 FC 475 at para 29; Doell v British Columbia (Minister of Public Safety and Solicitor General), 2016 BCS......
-
Potvin (Re), 2018 ABQB 652
...v Envision Credit Union, 2006 BCSC 750 at paras 27, 39, 151 ACWS (3d) 204; Crossroads-DMD Mortgage Investment Corporation v Gauthier, 2015 ABQB 703 at paras 68-85, 28 Alta LR (6th) 104; and Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce v McDougald, at paras 51-53. [95] This anti-banking conspiracy the......
-
d’Abadie v Her Majesty the Queen, 2018 ABQB 298
...ABCA 14; Rothweiler v Payette, 2018 ABQB 134. As Master Schulz observed in Crossroads-DMD Mortgage Investment Corporation v Gauthier, 2015 ABQB 703 at para 41, 28 Alta LR (6th) 104, “... The “Strawman” is therefore not merely a myth. It is litigation poison. [70] I conclude that d’Abadie’s ......
-
Scotia Mortgage Corporation v. Landry, 2018 ABQB 951
...of bad faith, abusive litigation: Fiander v Mills, at paras 21, 37-40; Crossroads-DMD Mortgage Investment Corporation v Gauthier, 2015 ABQB 703 at para 47, 28 Alta LR (6th) 104; Pomerleau v Canada (Revenue Agency), at para 73; Rothweiler v Payette, 2018 ABQB 399 at para 27; d’Abadie v Her M......
-
Toronto-Dominion Bank v Leadbetter, 2018 ABQB 472
...of Montreal v Rogozinsky, 2014 ABQB 771 at paras 48-54, 18 Alta LR (6th) 1; Crossroads-DMD Mortgage Investment Corporation v Gauthier, 2015 ABQB 703 at paras 68-85, 28 Alta LR (6th) 104. Courts have consistently rejected this pseudolegal concept as a defence against debt [22] Third, Ms. Lea......
-
New Rules For Foreign Home Buyers In Canada Now In Force: Here's What You Need To Know
...the common law principle that "A mortgage is an interest in land" (see for example, Crossroads-DMD Mortgage Investment Corp. v. Gauthier, 2015 ABQB 703 at para 59). As a result, we are of the view that the broad definition of "purchase" captures mortgages (whether intended by the government......