Potvin (Re)
| Jurisdiction | Alberta |
| Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada) |
| Judge | Rooke |
| Citation | 2018 ABQB 652 |
| Docket Number | 1801 12765 |
| Date | 07 September 2018 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
31 practice notes
-
Knutson (Re)
...at paras 11-12, see also Meads v Meads at paras 417-446; Pomerleau v Canada (Revenue Agency), 2017 ABQB 123 at paras 67-88; Potvin (Re), 2018 ABQB 652 at paras 83-92; Donald J Netolitzky, “Organized Pseudolegal Commercial Arguments and Magic and Ceremony” (2018) 55:4 Alta L Rev 1045 at ... ......
-
Scotia Mortgage Corporation v. Landry
...2018 ABQB 298 at paras 57-70; Rothweiler v Payette, 2018 ABQB 134 at paras 10-17, confirmed 2018 ABQB 399 at paras 25-33; Potvin (Re), 2018 ABQB 652 at paras 110-120. [20] In fact, Strawman Theory is so notoriously wrong (“fanciful”, “no rational support”, and “no basis in the law”) that, i......
-
ATB Financial v. Dimsdale Auto Parts Ltd
...religious vehicles: Meads at para 186. Unsurprisingly, Canadian courts uniformly reject all such CERI claims, e.g., Meads, Potvin (Re), 2018 ABQB 652 [Potvin #1]; CP (Re), 2019 ABQB 310 [CP [5] Unfortunately, that has not stopped Belanger from continuing to advance his false not-law schemes......
-
Royal Bank of Canada v Anderson
...the “Strawman”: see Meads v Meads at paras 417-446; Pomerleau v Canada (Revenue Agency), 2017 ABQB 123 at paras 67-88; Potvin (Re), 2018 ABQB 652 at paras 83-92; Donald J Netolitzky, “Organized Pseudolegal Commercial Arguments and Magic and Ceremony” (2018) 55:4 Alta L Rev 1045 at 1069-1078......
Get Started for Free
29 cases
-
Scotia Mortgage Corporation v. Landry
...2018 ABQB 298 at paras 57-70; Rothweiler v Payette, 2018 ABQB 134 at paras 10-17, confirmed 2018 ABQB 399 at paras 25-33; Potvin (Re), 2018 ABQB 652 at paras 110-120. [20] In fact, Strawman Theory is so notoriously wrong (“fanciful”, “no rational support”, and “no basis in the law”) that, i......
-
ATB Financial v. Dimsdale Auto Parts Ltd
...religious vehicles: Meads at para 186. Unsurprisingly, Canadian courts uniformly reject all such CERI claims, e.g., Meads, Potvin (Re), 2018 ABQB 652 [Potvin #1]; CP (Re), 2019 ABQB 310 [CP [5] Unfortunately, that has not stopped Belanger from continuing to advance his false not-law schemes......
-
Royal Bank of Canada v Anderson
...the “Strawman”: see Meads v Meads at paras 417-446; Pomerleau v Canada (Revenue Agency), 2017 ABQB 123 at paras 67-88; Potvin (Re), 2018 ABQB 652 at paras 83-92; Donald J Netolitzky, “Organized Pseudolegal Commercial Arguments and Magic and Ceremony” (2018) 55:4 Alta L Rev 1045 at 1069-1078......
-
Labonte v Alberta Health Services
...but a persistent lie. Strawman concepts, in all their various forms, are universally rejected by Canadian courts, see Potvin (Re), 2018 ABQB 652 at paras 83-85, 110-120, Meads v Meads, at paras 417-446; Pomerleau v Canada (Revenue Agency), 2017 ABQB 123 at paras 67-88, [2017] DTC 5024; d’Ab......
Get Started for Free
