Potvin (Re)
| Judge | Rooke |
| Citation | 2018 ABQB 652 |
| Date | 07 September 2018 |
| Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada) |
| Docket Number | 1801 12765 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
28 practice notes
-
Olumide v. Nova Scotia Human Rights Commission,
...before courts in other jurisdictions, and even before tribunals, is relevant on a motion for a Vexatious Litigant Order: Potvin (Re), 2018 ABQB 652, at para. 59; McMeekin v. Alberta (Attorney General), 2012 ABQB 456, at paras. 83-127; Curle v. Curle, 2014 ONSC 1077, at para. 24; Fearn v. Ca......
-
Scotia Mortgage Corporation v. Landry, 2018 ABQB 951
...2018 ABQB 298 at paras 57-70; Rothweiler v Payette, 2018 ABQB 134 at paras 10-17, confirmed 2018 ABQB 399 at paras 25-33; Potvin (Re), 2018 ABQB 652 at paras 110-120. [20] In fact, Strawman Theory is so notoriously wrong (“fanciful”, “no rational support”, and “no basis in the law”) that, i......
-
Labonte v Alberta Health Services, 2019 ABQB 41
...but a persistent lie. Strawman concepts, in all their various forms, are universally rejected by Canadian courts, see Potvin (Re), 2018 ABQB 652 at paras 83-85, 110-120, Meads v Meads, at paras 417-446; Pomerleau v Canada (Revenue Agency), 2017 ABQB 123 at paras 67-88, [2017] DTC 5024; d’Ab......
-
DKD (Re) (Dependent Adult), 2018 ABQB 1021
...(3d) 847; Gauthier v Starr, at para 39; Gauthier (Re), 2017 ABQB 555 at paras 65-66, 87 CPC (7th) 555, aff’d 2018 ABCA 14; Potvin (Re), 2018 ABQB 652 at paras 79-80; Knutson (Re), 2018 ABQB 858 at paras [15] Attempts to use OPCA strategies to impose pseudolegal obligations or penalties on o......
Get Started for Free
28 cases
-
Olumide v. Nova Scotia Human Rights Commission,
...before courts in other jurisdictions, and even before tribunals, is relevant on a motion for a Vexatious Litigant Order: Potvin (Re), 2018 ABQB 652, at para. 59; McMeekin v. Alberta (Attorney General), 2012 ABQB 456, at paras. 83-127; Curle v. Curle, 2014 ONSC 1077, at para. 24; Fearn v. Ca......
-
Scotia Mortgage Corporation v. Landry, 2018 ABQB 951
...2018 ABQB 298 at paras 57-70; Rothweiler v Payette, 2018 ABQB 134 at paras 10-17, confirmed 2018 ABQB 399 at paras 25-33; Potvin (Re), 2018 ABQB 652 at paras 110-120. [20] In fact, Strawman Theory is so notoriously wrong (“fanciful”, “no rational support”, and “no basis in the law”) that, i......
-
Labonte v Alberta Health Services, 2019 ABQB 41
...but a persistent lie. Strawman concepts, in all their various forms, are universally rejected by Canadian courts, see Potvin (Re), 2018 ABQB 652 at paras 83-85, 110-120, Meads v Meads, at paras 417-446; Pomerleau v Canada (Revenue Agency), 2017 ABQB 123 at paras 67-88, [2017] DTC 5024; d’Ab......
-
DKD (Re) (Dependent Adult), 2018 ABQB 1021
...(3d) 847; Gauthier v Starr, at para 39; Gauthier (Re), 2017 ABQB 555 at paras 65-66, 87 CPC (7th) 555, aff’d 2018 ABCA 14; Potvin (Re), 2018 ABQB 652 at paras 79-80; Knutson (Re), 2018 ABQB 858 at paras [15] Attempts to use OPCA strategies to impose pseudolegal obligations or penalties on o......
Get Started for Free