Potvin (Re), 2018 ABQB 652

JudgeRooke
Date07 September 2018
CourtCourt of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
Docket Number1801 12765
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
19 practice notes
  • Olumide v. Nova Scotia Human Rights Commission, 2019 NSSC 223
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of Nova Scotia (Canada)
    • July 15, 2019
    ...before courts in other jurisdictions, and even before tribunals, is relevant on a motion for a Vexatious Litigant Order: Potvin (Re), 2018 ABQB 652, at para. 59; McMeekin v. Alberta (Attorney General), 2012 ABQB 456, at paras. 83-127; Curle v. Curle, 2014 ONSC 1077, at para. 24; Fearn v. Ca......
  • Scotia Mortgage Corporation v. Landry, 2018 ABQB 951
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • November 21, 2018
    ...2018 ABQB 298 at paras 57-70; Rothweiler v Payette, 2018 ABQB 134 at paras 10-17, confirmed 2018 ABQB 399 at paras 25-33; Potvin (Re), 2018 ABQB 652 at paras 110-120. [20] In fact, Strawman Theory is so notoriously wrong (“fanciful”, “no rational support”, and “no basis in the law”) that, i......
  • Labonte v Alberta Health Services, 2019 ABQB 41
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • January 22, 2019
    ...but a persistent lie. Strawman concepts, in all their various forms, are universally rejected by Canadian courts, see Potvin (Re), 2018 ABQB 652 at paras 83-85, 110-120, Meads v Meads, at paras 417-446; Pomerleau v Canada (Revenue Agency), 2017 ABQB 123 at paras 67-88, [2017] DTC 5024; d’Ab......
  • DKD (Re) (Dependent Adult), 2018 ABQB 1021
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • December 17, 2018
    ...(3d) 847; Gauthier v Starr, at para 39; Gauthier (Re), 2017 ABQB 555 at paras 65-66, 87 CPC (7th) 555, aff’d 2018 ABCA 14; Potvin (Re), 2018 ABQB 652 at paras 79-80; Knutson (Re), 2018 ABQB 858 at paras [15] Attempts to use OPCA strategies to impose pseudolegal obligations or penalties on o......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
19 cases
  • Olumide v. Nova Scotia Human Rights Commission, 2019 NSSC 223
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of Nova Scotia (Canada)
    • July 15, 2019
    ...before courts in other jurisdictions, and even before tribunals, is relevant on a motion for a Vexatious Litigant Order: Potvin (Re), 2018 ABQB 652, at para. 59; McMeekin v. Alberta (Attorney General), 2012 ABQB 456, at paras. 83-127; Curle v. Curle, 2014 ONSC 1077, at para. 24; Fearn v. Ca......
  • Scotia Mortgage Corporation v. Landry, 2018 ABQB 951
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • November 21, 2018
    ...2018 ABQB 298 at paras 57-70; Rothweiler v Payette, 2018 ABQB 134 at paras 10-17, confirmed 2018 ABQB 399 at paras 25-33; Potvin (Re), 2018 ABQB 652 at paras 110-120. [20] In fact, Strawman Theory is so notoriously wrong (“fanciful”, “no rational support”, and “no basis in the law”) that, i......
  • Royal Bank of Canada v Anderson,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • August 3, 2022
    ...see Meads v Meads at paras 417-446; Pomerleau v Canada (Revenue Agency), 2017 ABQB 123 at paras 67-88; Potvin (Re), 2018 ABQB 652 at paras 83-92; Donald J Netolitzky, “Organized Pseudolegal Commercial Arguments and Magic and Ceremony” (2018) 55:4 Alta L Rev 1045 at 1069-1078. ......
  • Labonte v Alberta Health Services, 2019 ABQB 41
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • January 22, 2019
    ...but a persistent lie. Strawman concepts, in all their various forms, are universally rejected by Canadian courts, see Potvin (Re), 2018 ABQB 652 at paras 83-85, 110-120, Meads v Meads, at paras 417-446; Pomerleau v Canada (Revenue Agency), 2017 ABQB 123 at paras 67-88, [2017] DTC 5024; d’Ab......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT