DKD (Re) (Dependent Adult), 2018 ABQB 1021

JudgeS.N. Mandziuk
Citation2018 ABQB 1021
Date17 December 2018
CourtCourt of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
Docket NumberDA03 16734
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
13 practice notes
  • Royal Bank of Canada v Anderson, 2022 ABQB 525
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • August 3, 2022
    ...paras 79-80; Knutson (Re), 2018 ABQB 858 at paras 61-62, court access restricted 2018 ABQB 1050 at para 18; DKD (Re) (Dependent Adult), 2018 ABQB 1021 at para 14; Labonte v Alberta Health Services, 2019 ABQB 41 at paras 22-26; CP (Re), 2019 ABQB 310 at para 29; Portincasa v Taylor, 2022 ABQ......
  • Harun-ar-Rashid v Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP), 2019 ABQB 54
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • January 23, 2019
    ...action as a whole. Since then additional indicia categories have been identified in Canadian jurisprudence: DKD (Re) (Dependent Adult), 2018 ABQB 1021 at para [92] Conservatively, the Plaintiffs’ litigation exhibits two of these indicia: 1) hopeless proceedings, and 2) unsubstantiated alleg......
  • Anderson v Ossowski, 2021 ABQB 428
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • June 1, 2021
    ...paras 79-80; Knutson (Re), 2018 ABQB 858 at paras 61-62, court access restricted 2018 ABQB 1050 at para 18; DKD (Re) (Dependent Adult), 2018 ABQB 1021 at para 14; Labonte v Alberta Health Services, 2019 ABQB 41 at paras 22-26; CP (Re), 2019 ABQB 310 at para 29. Ms. Anderson knows (or has ig......
  • Laird v (Alberta) Maintenance Enforcement,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • January 9, 2019
    ...at para 31. [72] Additional indicia categories have been identified by cases released since Chutskoff (see DKD (Re) (Dependent Adult), 2018 ABQB 1021 at para [73] If the court concludes that any indicia of abusive litigation are present, then that is a basis to impose court access restricti......
  • Get Started for Free
14 cases
  • Royal Bank of Canada v Anderson, 2022 ABQB 525
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • August 3, 2022
    ...paras 79-80; Knutson (Re), 2018 ABQB 858 at paras 61-62, court access restricted 2018 ABQB 1050 at para 18; DKD (Re) (Dependent Adult), 2018 ABQB 1021 at para 14; Labonte v Alberta Health Services, 2019 ABQB 41 at paras 22-26; CP (Re), 2019 ABQB 310 at para 29; Portincasa v Taylor, 2022 ABQ......
  • Harun-ar-Rashid v Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP), 2019 ABQB 54
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • January 23, 2019
    ...action as a whole. Since then additional indicia categories have been identified in Canadian jurisprudence: DKD (Re) (Dependent Adult), 2018 ABQB 1021 at para [92] Conservatively, the Plaintiffs’ litigation exhibits two of these indicia: 1) hopeless proceedings, and 2) unsubstantiated alleg......
  • Anderson v Ossowski, 2021 ABQB 428
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • June 1, 2021
    ...paras 79-80; Knutson (Re), 2018 ABQB 858 at paras 61-62, court access restricted 2018 ABQB 1050 at para 18; DKD (Re) (Dependent Adult), 2018 ABQB 1021 at para 14; Labonte v Alberta Health Services, 2019 ABQB 41 at paras 22-26; CP (Re), 2019 ABQB 310 at para 29. Ms. Anderson knows (or has ig......
  • Laird v (Alberta) Maintenance Enforcement,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • January 9, 2019
    ...at para 31. [72] Additional indicia categories have been identified by cases released since Chutskoff (see DKD (Re) (Dependent Adult), 2018 ABQB 1021 at para [73] If the court concludes that any indicia of abusive litigation are present, then that is a basis to impose court access restricti......
  • Get Started for Free

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT