Cruz v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 1283

JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
CourtFederal Court (Canada)
Citation2018 FC 1283
Date19 December 2018
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
5 practice notes
  • Azam v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 115
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • January 23, 2020
    ...the existing jurisprudence prior to the Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in Vavilov. See Cruz v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 1283 at para 3 and Liu v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 954 at para 15. [17] When reviewing a decision on the standard of reasonable......
  • Kaur v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 30
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • January 11, 2022
    ...exhibited a reasonable apprehension of bias towards Ms. Kaur. As stated by Justice Diner in Cruz v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 1283 [Cruz] at paragraph 13, “the role of an officer is not only to assist in facilitating the movement of foreign nationals and workers as set ou......
  • Kumar v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 935
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • September 28, 2020
    ...assessment of a work permit applicant’s ability to perform the work sought: Cruz v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 1283 at para 7. In my view, it is clear from the Officer’s reasons that the key issue in Mr. Kumar’s work permit application was the lack of evidence ......
  • Singh v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 240
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • February 22, 2022
    ...satisfying the officer that he could fulfill the terms of his job offer and failed to do so [Cruz v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 1283 at paras 7-8; Bautista v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 669 at para 15]. [8] Moreover, a visa officer has a wide discretion a......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
5 cases
  • Azam v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 115
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • January 23, 2020
    ...the existing jurisprudence prior to the Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in Vavilov. See Cruz v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 1283 at para 3 and Liu v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 954 at para 15. [17] When reviewing a decision on the standard of reasonable......
  • Kaur v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 30
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • January 11, 2022
    ...exhibited a reasonable apprehension of bias towards Ms. Kaur. As stated by Justice Diner in Cruz v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 1283 [Cruz] at paragraph 13, “the role of an officer is not only to assist in facilitating the movement of foreign nationals and workers as set ou......
  • Kumar v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 935
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • September 28, 2020
    ...assessment of a work permit applicant’s ability to perform the work sought: Cruz v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 1283 at para 7. In my view, it is clear from the Officer’s reasons that the key issue in Mr. Kumar’s work permit application was the lack of evidence ......
  • Singh v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 240
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • February 22, 2022
    ...satisfying the officer that he could fulfill the terms of his job offer and failed to do so [Cruz v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 1283 at paras 7-8; Bautista v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 669 at para 15]. [8] Moreover, a visa officer has a wide discretion a......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT