David v. Loblaw,

JurisdictionOntario
JudgeE.M. MORGAN, J.
Neutral Citation2021 ONSC 7331
Citation2021 ONSC 7331
Date31 December 2021
Docket NumberCV-17-586063-00CP
CourtSuperior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
1 practice notes
  • Jensen v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., 2023 FCA 89
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Canada)
    • 28 Abril 2023
    ...with respect to the acts alleged against each of the co-conspirators: see, for example, Mancuso at para. 18; David v. Loblaw, 2021 ONSC 7331,160 O.R. (3d) 33 at para. 33 [Loblaw]; Mancinelli at paras. [65] The Motion Judge next considered the pleading’s allegations of direct communic......
2 cases
  • Jensen v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., 2023 FCA 89
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Canada)
    • 28 Abril 2023
    ...with respect to the acts alleged against each of the co-conspirators: see, for example, Mancuso at para. 18; David v. Loblaw, 2021 ONSC 7331,160 O.R. (3d) 33 at para. 33 [Loblaw]; Mancinelli at paras. [65] The Motion Judge next considered the pleading’s allegations of direct communic......
  • Pugliese v Chartwell,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • 7 Marzo 2024
    ...Daniels Midland Company, [2013] 3 SCR 545, or of a product whose price was inflated by a conspiracy of defendants: David v. Loblaw, 2021 ONSC 7331, aff'd 2022 ONCA 63 Nevertheless, the class must be composed of members with the same fundamental relationship with the alleged wrongdoer. Where......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT