David v. Loblaw,

JurisdictionOntario
JudgeE.M. MORGAN, J
Neutral Citation2018 ONSC 1298
Citation2018 ONSC 1298
CourtSuperior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
Date01 March 2018
Docket NumberCV-17-586063-00CP and CV-17-00005494-00CP
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
33 practice notes
  • Overview
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Canadian Class Action Review No. 14-1, December 2018
    • 1 December 2018
    ...opt-out class action in Ontario (excluding Saskatchewan and Quebec),220 215 216 217 218 219 220 David v Loblaw; Breckon v Loblaw, 2018 ONSC 1298, competing class counsel characterized the practice as “predatory” (at para 33). In that carriage motion, Morgan J held the interrelationship of c......
  • The Early Campaign for Reform and the Olrc Report
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Canadian Class Action Review No. 14-1, December 2018
    • 1 December 2018
    ...opt-out class action in Ontario (excluding Saskatchewan and Quebec),220 215 216 217 218 219 220 David v Loblaw; Breckon v Loblaw, 2018 ONSC 1298, competing class counsel characterized the practice as “predatory” (at para 33). In that carriage motion, Morgan J held the interrelationship of c......
  • The Report of the Attorney General’s Advisory Committee on Class Action Reform (1985-1993)
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Canadian Class Action Review No. 14-1, December 2018
    • 1 December 2018
    ...opt-out class action in Ontario (excluding Saskatchewan and Quebec),220 215 216 217 218 219 220 David v Loblaw; Breckon v Loblaw, 2018 ONSC 1298, competing class counsel characterized the practice as “predatory” (at para 33). In that carriage motion, Morgan J held the interrelationship of c......
  • An Overview of Class Actions and Covid-19 in Ontario’s Long-term Care Facilities
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Canadian Class Action Review No. 16-2, March 2021
    • 1 March 2021
    ...the two cases. First, Asquith was the British Columbian counterpart of an Ontarian carriage battle, David v Loblaw; Breckon v Loblaw, 2018 ONSC 1298. In Asquith, the court cited the relevant factors as those listed in David v Loblaw; Breckon v Loblaw, which in turn cited a prior case, Kowal......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 cases
  • Del Giudice v. Thompson, 2020 ONSC 2676
    • Canada
    • Ontario Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • 30 April 2020
    ...Canntrust, 2020 ONSC 579; Winder v. Marriott International Inc., 2019 ONSC 5766; Rogers v Aphria Inc, 2019 ONSC 3698; David v. Loblaws, 2018 ONSC 1298; Agnew-Americano v. Equifax Canada Co., 2018 ONSC 275; Kaplan v. Casino Rama Services Inc., 2017 ONSC 2671; Kowalyshyn v. Valeant Pharmaceut......
  • Laliberte v. Canada (Attorney General), 2019 FC 766
    • Canada
    • Canada (Federal) Federal Court (Canada)
    • 31 May 2019
    ...the same weight and these are not exhaustive of potential issues in other cases. Justice Morgan in David v Loblaw; Breckson v Loblaw, 2018 ONSC 1298 at para 4, 289 ACWS (3d) 253, said it well: As my colleague Perell, J. pointed out …, “Although the determination of a carriage motion will de......
30 books & journal articles
  • Foreword
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Canadian Class Action Review No. 14-1, December 2018
    • 1 December 2018
    ...opt-out class action in Ontario (excluding Saskatchewan and Quebec),220 215 216 217 218 219 220 David v Loblaw; Breckon v Loblaw, 2018 ONSC 1298, competing class counsel characterized the practice as “predatory” (at para 33). In that carriage motion, Morgan J held the interrelationship of c......
  • Acknowledgements
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Canadian Class Action Review No. 14-1, December 2018
    • 1 December 2018
    ...opt-out class action in Ontario (excluding Saskatchewan and Quebec),220 215 216 217 218 219 220 David v Loblaw; Breckon v Loblaw, 2018 ONSC 1298, competing class counsel characterized the practice as “predatory” (at para 33). In that carriage motion, Morgan J held the interrelationship of c......
  • Overview
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Canadian Class Action Review No. 14-1, December 2018
    • 1 December 2018
    ...opt-out class action in Ontario (excluding Saskatchewan and Quebec),220 215 216 217 218 219 220 David v Loblaw; Breckon v Loblaw, 2018 ONSC 1298, competing class counsel characterized the practice as “predatory” (at para 33). In that carriage motion, Morgan J held the interrelationship of c......
  • Class Actions in England, North America, and Australia
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Canadian Class Action Review No. 14-1, December 2018
    • 1 December 2018
    ...opt-out class action in Ontario (excluding Saskatchewan and Quebec),220 215 216 217 218 219 220 David v Loblaw; Breckon v Loblaw, 2018 ONSC 1298, competing class counsel characterized the practice as “predatory” (at para 33). In that carriage motion, Morgan J held the interrelationship of c......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT