Dayfallah v. Canada (Attorney General)

JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
CourtFederal Court (Canada)
Citation2018 FC 1120
Date07 November 2018

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
7 practice notes
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Labour and Employment Law in the Federal Public Service - Second Edition Part VI
    • February 27, 2024
    ...586 Davies v Canada (Attorney General), [2005] FCJ No 188 (CA) ................ 562 Dayfallah v Canada (Attorney General), 2018 FC 1120 .................... 601, 602 De Santis v Commissioner of the Correctional Service of Canada, 2016 PSLREB 34 ..................................................
  • Appointments and the Public Service Employment Act
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Labour and Employment Law in the Federal Public Service - Second Edition Part IV
    • February 27, 2024
    ...commented that this may include recklessness but declined to determine that issue conclusively: Dayfallah v Canada (Attorney General) , 2018 FC 1120 at para 97 [ Dayfallah ]. 260 Egbers , above note 258 at para 56. Section 133 of the PSEA also states that fraud in an appointment process is ......
  • Cadostin v. Canada (Attorney General)
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • January 31, 2020
    ...application and interpretation of the provision fall within the Commission’s specialized expertise (Dayfallah v Canada (Attorney General), 2018 FC 1120 [Dayfallah] at para 34; MacAdam v Canada (Attorney General), 2014 FC 443 at paras 49-50). This was confirmed in the decision rendered by Ju......
  • Singh v. Canada (Senate)
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • June 7, 2022
    ...Kane v Bd of Governors of UBC, 1980 CanLII 10 (SCC), [1980] 1 SCR 1105 at page 1113; see also Dayfallah v. Canada (Attorney General), 2018 FC 1120 at para 45). [69] First, turning to the Adjudicator’s reasons, there is no question that she considered the Policy, having cited its para......
  • Get Started for Free
5 cases
  • Cadostin v. Canada (Attorney General)
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • January 31, 2020
    ...application and interpretation of the provision fall within the Commission’s specialized expertise (Dayfallah v Canada (Attorney General), 2018 FC 1120 [Dayfallah] at para 34; MacAdam v Canada (Attorney General), 2014 FC 443 at paras 49-50). This was confirmed in the decision rendered by Ju......
  • Singh v. Canada (Senate)
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • June 7, 2022
    ...Kane v Bd of Governors of UBC, 1980 CanLII 10 (SCC), [1980] 1 SCR 1105 at page 1113; see also Dayfallah v. Canada (Attorney General), 2018 FC 1120 at para 45). [69] First, turning to the Adjudicator’s reasons, there is no question that she considered the Policy, having cited its para......
  • Cadostin v. Canada (Attorney General)
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • September 23, 2019
    ...of the Commission (MacAdam v Canada (Attorney General), 2014 FC 443 at paras 49-50 (MacAdam); Dayfallah v Canada (Attorney General), 2018 FC 1120 at para 34 (Dayfallah)). The Decision must be accorded significant deference by this Court in light of the “discrete and special nature” of the P......
  • THIBEAULT v. THE SASKATCHEWAN APPRENTICESHIP AND TRADE CERTIFICATION COMMISSION and APPEAL COMMITTEE OF THE SASKATCHEWAN APPRENTICESHIP AND TRADE CERTIFICATION COMMISSION
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • July 20, 2020
    ...judgments by the Federal Court including both Lemelin v Canada (Attorney General), 2018 FC 286, and Dayfallah v Canada (Attorney General), 2018 FC 1120. [43] What is to be taken from the Ligondé decision is that the Appeal Committee’s conclusion that Mr. Thibeault knew or ought to have know......
  • Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Labour and Employment Law in the Federal Public Service - Second Edition Part VI
    • February 27, 2024
    ...586 Davies v Canada (Attorney General), [2005] FCJ No 188 (CA) ................ 562 Dayfallah v Canada (Attorney General), 2018 FC 1120 .................... 601, 602 De Santis v Commissioner of the Correctional Service of Canada, 2016 PSLREB 34 ..................................................
  • Appointments and the Public Service Employment Act
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Labour and Employment Law in the Federal Public Service - Second Edition Part IV
    • February 27, 2024
    ...commented that this may include recklessness but declined to determine that issue conclusively: Dayfallah v Canada (Attorney General) , 2018 FC 1120 at para 97 [ Dayfallah ]. 260 Egbers , above note 258 at para 56. Section 133 of the PSEA also states that fraud in an appointment process is ......