Dennis v. Fothergill
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
| Judge | Bruce, J. |
| Citation | [2012] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1510,[2012] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1510 (SC),2012 BCSC 1510 |
| Date | 12 October 2012 |
| Subject Matter | DAMAGE AWARDS,INSURANCE,DAMAGES,TORTS |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
7 practice notes
-
Sendher v. Wong et al.
...an award of between $40,000 and $50,000 is appropriate, citing Sharifi v. Chaklader , 2012 BCSC 685 ($50,000); Dennis v. Fothergill , 2012 BCSC 1510 ($40,000); Unger v. Bailey , 2012 BCSC 932 ($50,000 including loss of housekeeping); Rozendaal v. Landingin , 2013 BCSC 24 ($40,000); and Dian......
-
Mallier v. Falcomer
...of living from these injuries had been exaggerated. The court awarded $25,000 in non-pecuniary damages. b) Dennis v. Fothergill, 2012 BCSC 1510, which involved a 42 year old plaintiff who was in a significant accident similar to Mrs. Mallier’s. In Dennis, the court found that the plaintiff’......
-
Friesen v. Moo
...Nobel’s report depends on the plaintiff’s credibility in reporting his symptoms and history to the doctor: see e.g. Dennis v. Fothergill, 2012 BCSC 1510 at para. 77. [75] The defendants challenge Dr. Le Nobel’s opinions for a number of reasons. [76] First, regarding the plaintiff’s involvem......
-
Cox v. Acapulco
...The injuries did not prevent the plaintiff from working, but he did so in pain [at paras 104 and 106]. [137] In Dennis v. Fothergill, 2012 BCSC 1510, the plaintiff, 42 at the time of the accident and 47 at the time of trial, was awarded $40,000 in non-pecuniary damages (approximately $44,40......
Get Started for Free
7 cases
-
Sendher v. Wong et al.
...an award of between $40,000 and $50,000 is appropriate, citing Sharifi v. Chaklader , 2012 BCSC 685 ($50,000); Dennis v. Fothergill , 2012 BCSC 1510 ($40,000); Unger v. Bailey , 2012 BCSC 932 ($50,000 including loss of housekeeping); Rozendaal v. Landingin , 2013 BCSC 24 ($40,000); and Dian......
-
Mallier v. Falcomer
...of living from these injuries had been exaggerated. The court awarded $25,000 in non-pecuniary damages. b) Dennis v. Fothergill, 2012 BCSC 1510, which involved a 42 year old plaintiff who was in a significant accident similar to Mrs. Mallier’s. In Dennis, the court found that the plaintiff’......
-
Friesen v. Moo
...Nobel’s report depends on the plaintiff’s credibility in reporting his symptoms and history to the doctor: see e.g. Dennis v. Fothergill, 2012 BCSC 1510 at para. 77. [75] The defendants challenge Dr. Le Nobel’s opinions for a number of reasons. [76] First, regarding the plaintiff’s involvem......
-
Cox v. Acapulco
...The injuries did not prevent the plaintiff from working, but he did so in pain [at paras 104 and 106]. [137] In Dennis v. Fothergill, 2012 BCSC 1510, the plaintiff, 42 at the time of the accident and 47 at the time of trial, was awarded $40,000 in non-pecuniary damages (approximately $44,40......
Get Started for Free
