Duggan v. Durham Region Non-Profit Housing Corporation

JurisdictionOntario
CourtCourt of Appeal (Ontario)
JudgeFeldman, Fairburn and Nordheimer JJ.A.
Citation2020 ONCA 788
Date15 December 2020
Docket Number20201215

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
24 practice notes
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (July 31 ' August 4)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • August 8, 2023
    ...ONCA 176, Bakhsh v. Merdad, 2022 ONCA 130, Studley v. Studley, 2022 ONCA 810, Duggan v. Durham Region Non-Profit Housing Corporation, 2020 ONCA 788, Harvey v. Talon International Inc., 2017 ONCA 267, 313473 Ontario Ltd. et al. v. Lornal Construction Ltd. et al. (1976), 18 O.R. (2d) 374 (Div......
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (June 23-27, 2025)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • July 2, 2025
    ...Canada (Attorney General) v. Bedford, 2012 ONCA 186, R. v. Comeau, 2018 SCC 15, Duggan v. Durham Region Non-Profit Housing Corporation, 2020 ONCA 788, R. v. Kirkpatrick, 2022 SCC 33, Canada v. Craig, 2012 SCC 43, Canada (Canadian Human Rights Commission) v. Canada (Attorney General), 2018 S......
  • Restoule v. Canada (Attorney General)
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • November 5, 2021
    ...making [a bifurcation] order without the consent of the parties”: Duggan v. Durham Region Non-Profit Housing Corporation, 2020 ONCA 788, 454 D.L.R. (4th) 496, at para. [287] Nacho Nyak Dun, at para. 60. [288] Clyde River (Hamlet) v. Petroleum Geo-Services Inc., 2017 SCC 40, [2017] 1 ......
  • Drover v Canada (Attorney General)
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • June 26, 2025
    ...a legal rule that applies to any fact situation posing the same legal issue: Duggan v. Durham Region Non-Profit Housing Corporation, 2020 ONCA 788, 153 O.R. (3d) 465, at paras. 57–61; see also R. v. Kirkpatrick, 2022 SCC 33, 471 D.L.R. (4th) 440, at para. 127, per Côté, Brown and Rowe JJ. (......
  • Get Started for Free
29 cases
  • Restoule v. Canada (Attorney General)
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • November 5, 2021
    ...rule “precludes making [a bifurcation] order without the consent of the parties”: Duggan v. Durham Region Non-Profit Housing Corporation, 2020 ONCA 788, 454 D.L.R. (4th) 496, at para. [287] Nacho Nyak Dun, at para. 60. [288] Clyde River (Hamlet) v. Petroleum Geo-Services Inc., 2017 SCC 40, ......
  • Drover v. Canada (Attorney General)
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • June 26, 2025
    ...a legal rule that applies to any fact situation posing the same legal issue: Duggan v. Durham Region Non-Profit Housing Corporation, 2020 ONCA 788, 153 O.R. (3d) 465, at paras. 57-61; see also R. v. Kirkpatrick, 2022 SCC 33, 471 D.L.R. (4th) 440, at para. 127, per Côté, Brown and Rowe JJ. (......
  • Ghazvini et al v. Canadian Imperial Bank Of Commerce
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • September 25, 2025
    ...v. Canada (Attorney General), 2015 SCC 5, [2015] 1 S.C.R. 331, at paras. 44-46; Duggan v. Durham Region Non-Profit Housing Corporation, 2020 ONCA 788, 153 O.R. (3d) 465, at para. 63. [34]        The parties agree that in 2020, Waksdale changed the law; now......
  • Bank of Montreal v. Iskenderov
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • August 4, 2023
    ...seeking an appeal to a five-judge panel of this court to reconsider it: see Duggan v. Durham Region Non-Profit Housing Corporation, 2020 ONCA 788, 153 O.R. (3d) 465, at paras. 51-63. (2) Did the trial judge err in ordering a trial of the issue of discoverability? [68] The appellants submit ......
  • Get Started for Free
3 firm's commentaries
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (July 31 ' August 4)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • August 8, 2023
    ...ONCA 176, Bakhsh v. Merdad, 2022 ONCA 130, Studley v. Studley, 2022 ONCA 810, Duggan v. Durham Region Non-Profit Housing Corporation, 2020 ONCA 788, Harvey v. Talon International Inc., 2017 ONCA 267, 313473 Ontario Ltd. et al. v. Lornal Construction Ltd. et al. (1976), 18 O.R. (2d) 374 (Div......
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (June 23-27, 2025)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • July 2, 2025
    ...Canada (Attorney General) v. Bedford, 2012 ONCA 186, R. v. Comeau, 2018 SCC 15, Duggan v. Durham Region Non-Profit Housing Corporation, 2020 ONCA 788, R. v. Kirkpatrick, 2022 SCC 33, Canada v. Craig, 2012 SCC 43, Canada (Canadian Human Rights Commission) v. Canada (Attorney General), 2018 S......
  • Duggan V. Durham Region Non-Profit Housing Corporation, 2020 Onca 788
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • January 18, 2021
    ...including separate hearings on the issues of liability and damages.1 In Duggan v Durham Region Non-Profit Housing Corporation, 2020 ONCA 788, the issue before the Court of Appeal was the proper interpretation of r. 6.1.01. The Court ultimately held that consent by the parties is required in......