Eggiman v. Martin

JurisdictionOntario
JudgeSimmons, Pardu and Nordheimer JJ.A.
Citation2019 ONCA 974
Docket NumberC66745
CourtCourt of Appeal (Ontario)
Date12 December 2019

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
4 practice notes
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (December 9 – December 13, 2019)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • December 17, 2019
    ...Have a nice weekend. John Polyzogopoulos Blaney McMurtry LLP 416.593.2953 Email Table of Contents Civil Decisions Eggiman v. Martin , 2019 ONCA 974 Keywords: Contracts, Franchise Agreements, Arbitration Clauses, Appeals, Jurisdiction, Arbitration Act, 1991, S.O. 1991, c. 17 s. 7(1), (2) and......
  • Agrium v Orbis Engineering Field Services, 2022 ABCA 266
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • August 8, 2022
    ...be taken from an interlocutory order … granting a stay of any action under section 3 of this title”); Eggiman v. Martin, 2019 ONCA 974, ¶ 8, leave to appeal ref’d, [2020] S.C.C.A. No. 44 (“There is no appeal to this court from the order of the motion judge. ......
  • Wang v. Mattamy Corporation,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • November 17, 2020
    ...Act is invoked, then s. 7(6) precludes any appeal from the decision rendered respecting the motion to stay: Eggiman v. Martin, 2019 ONCA 974 at para. 8. Thus, when a decision “falls squarely” within s. 7, it renders the decision “unappealable”: Radewych v. Brookfield Homes (Ontario) Ltd., 2......
  • Agrium, Inc v Colt Engineering Corporation, 2020 ABQB 807
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • December 22, 2020
    ...considered by Sullivan, J in Tatlow v Carolina Homes Inc., 2010 ABQB 412. [27] Agrium directed my attention to the Eggiman v Martin, 2019 ONCA 974 decision of the Ontario Court of Appeal. Like the Alberta Court of Appeal in Lamb, the Ontario Court of Appeal in Eggiman addressed whether it h......
3 cases
  • Agrium v Orbis Engineering Field Services, 2022 ABCA 266
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • August 8, 2022
    ...be taken from an interlocutory order … granting a stay of any action under section 3 of this title”); Eggiman v. Martin, 2019 ONCA 974, ¶ 8, leave to appeal ref’d, [2020] S.C.C.A. No. 44 (“There is no appeal to this court from the order of the motion judge. ......
  • Wang v. Mattamy Corporation,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • November 17, 2020
    ...Act is invoked, then s. 7(6) precludes any appeal from the decision rendered respecting the motion to stay: Eggiman v. Martin, 2019 ONCA 974 at para. 8. Thus, when a decision “falls squarely” within s. 7, it renders the decision “unappealable”: Radewych v. Brookfield Homes (Ontario) Ltd., 2......
  • Agrium, Inc v Colt Engineering Corporation, 2020 ABQB 807
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • December 22, 2020
    ...considered by Sullivan, J in Tatlow v Carolina Homes Inc., 2010 ABQB 412. [27] Agrium directed my attention to the Eggiman v Martin, 2019 ONCA 974 decision of the Ontario Court of Appeal. Like the Alberta Court of Appeal in Lamb, the Ontario Court of Appeal in Eggiman addressed whether it h......
1 firm's commentaries
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (December 9 – December 13, 2019)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • December 17, 2019
    ...Have a nice weekend. John Polyzogopoulos Blaney McMurtry LLP 416.593.2953 Email Table of Contents Civil Decisions Eggiman v. Martin , 2019 ONCA 974 Keywords: Contracts, Franchise Agreements, Arbitration Clauses, Appeals, Jurisdiction, Arbitration Act, 1991, S.O. 1991, c. 17 s. 7(1), (2) and......