Equustek Solutions Inc. et al. v. Jack et al., [2014] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1063 (SC)

JurisdictionBritish Columbia
JudgeFenlon, J.
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
Subject MatterCONTEMPT,PRACTICE,INJUNCTIONS,CONFLICT OF LAWS
Citation[2014] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1063 (SC),2014 BCSC 1063,[2014] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1063
Date13 June 2014
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
35 practice notes
  • Google Inc. v. Equustek Solutions Inc., 2017 SCC 34
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • June 28, 2017
    ...(4th) 224 , [2015] 11 W.W.R. 45 , [2015] B.C.J. No. 1193 (QL), 2015 CarswellBC 1590 (WL Can.), affirming a decision of Fenlon J., 2014 BCSC 1063, 63 B.C.L.R. (5th) 145 , 28 B.L.R. (5th) 265 , 374 D.L.R. (4th) 537 , [2014] 10 W.W.R. 652 , [2014] B.C.J. No. 1190 (QL), 2014 CarswellBC ......
  • Equustek Solutions Inc. et al. v. Jack et al., (2015) 373 B.C.A.C. 240 (CA)
    • Canada
    • British Columbia Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • June 11, 2015
    ...selling products in breach of the plaintiff's intellectual property rights and contrary to court orders. (See [2014] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1063; 2014 BCSC 1063). Google Inc. applied for leave to appeal, and in the event leave was granted, for a partial interim stay of the order pending the hearing......
  • Crouch v. Snell, (2015) 367 N.S.R.(2d) 357 (SC)
    • Canada
    • Nova Scotia Supreme Court of Nova Scotia (Canada)
    • December 10, 2015
    ...Solutions Inc. et al. v. Jack et al. (2015), 373 B.C.A.C. 240; 641 W.A.C. 240; 2015 BCCA 265, affing. [2014] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1063; 2014 BCSC 1063, refd to. [para. 171]. Sauvé v. Canada (Chief Electoral Officer) et al. (2002), 294 N.R. 1; 2002 SCC 68, refd to. [para. 172]. Carter et al. v. Ca......
  • Jurisdiction In Personam
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Conflict of Laws. Second Edition
    • June 21, 2016
    ...may be served generally, or (ii) has nominated 54 Ibid. See the analysis in Equustek Solutions Inc v Google Inc, 2015 BCCA 265, aff’g 2014 BCSC 1063, leave to appeal to SCC granted, [2015] SCCA No 55 See, for example, Business Corporations Act, RSA 2000, c B-9, s 279; Extra Provincial Corpo......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
13 cases
  • Google Inc. v. Equustek Solutions Inc., 2017 SCC 34
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • June 28, 2017
    ...(4th) 224 , [2015] 11 W.W.R. 45 , [2015] B.C.J. No. 1193 (QL), 2015 CarswellBC 1590 (WL Can.), affirming a decision of Fenlon J., 2014 BCSC 1063, 63 B.C.L.R. (5th) 145 , 28 B.L.R. (5th) 265 , 374 D.L.R. (4th) 537 , [2014] 10 W.W.R. 652 , [2014] B.C.J. No. 1190 (QL), 2014 CarswellBC ......
  • Equustek Solutions Inc. et al. v. Jack et al., (2015) 373 B.C.A.C. 240 (CA)
    • Canada
    • British Columbia Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • June 11, 2015
    ...selling products in breach of the plaintiff's intellectual property rights and contrary to court orders. (See [2014] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1063; 2014 BCSC 1063). Google Inc. applied for leave to appeal, and in the event leave was granted, for a partial interim stay of the order pending the hearing......
  • Crouch v. Snell, (2015) 367 N.S.R.(2d) 357 (SC)
    • Canada
    • Nova Scotia Supreme Court of Nova Scotia (Canada)
    • December 10, 2015
    ...Solutions Inc. et al. v. Jack et al. (2015), 373 B.C.A.C. 240; 641 W.A.C. 240; 2015 BCCA 265, affing. [2014] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1063; 2014 BCSC 1063, refd to. [para. 171]. Sauvé v. Canada (Chief Electoral Officer) et al. (2002), 294 N.R. 1; 2002 SCC 68, refd to. [para. 172]. Carter et al. v. Ca......
  • Niemela v. Malamas et al., [2015] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1024
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • June 16, 2015
    ...rather than in the Google Action. Mr. Niemela appears to have adopted this approach in reliance on Equustek Solutions Inc. v. Jack , 2014 BCSC 1063. That case recognizes that in extraordinary circumstances a non-party may be compelled to take steps to prevent continuing breaches of court or......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
18 firm's commentaries
  • Did A U.S. Court Just Disrespect The Supreme Court Of Canada's Global De-Indexing Decision?
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • November 10, 2017
    ...decision upheld a decision from the British Columbia Court of Appeals (2015 BCCA 265), and thereby, the decision of a lower BC court (2014 BCSC 1063), requiring Google, a non-party to the underlying infringement case, to de-index from Google's worldwide search results, webpages advertising ......
  • Will The Supreme Court Rein In Evasive Defendants? Equustek v Google Inc
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • March 2, 2016
    ...Glaxo Wellcome PLC c. MNR, [1998] 4 FCR 439 (CA) and GEA Group AG v. Ventra Group Co., 2009 ONCA 619. 4 Equustek Solutions Inc. v. Jack, 2014 BCSC 1063, affirmed Equustek Solutions Inc. v. Google Inc., 2015 BCCA 265, leave to appeal granted SCC No. 36602 (McLachlin CJ, Cromwell and Côté JJ.......
  • Worldwide De-Indexing Order Against Google Upheld By Supreme Court Of Canada
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • July 7, 2017
    ...Google to de-index the websites from all of its search engines worldwide. Over Google's objections, in Equustek Solutions Inc. v. Jack 2014 BCSC 1063 Madam Justice Fenlon of the British Columbia Supreme Court granted the injunction. Google subsequently applied for leave to appeal the decisi......
  • Will the Supreme Court Rein in Evasive Defendants? Equustek v Google Inc
    • Canada
    • JD Supra Canada
    • February 24, 2016
    ...Wellcome PLC c. MNR, [1998] 4 FCR 439 (CA) and GEA Group AG v. Ventra Group Co., 2009 ONCA 619. [4] Equustek Solutions Inc. v. Jack, 2014 BCSC 1063, affirmed Equustek Solutions Inc. v. Google Inc., 2015 BCCA 265, leave to appeal granted SCC No. 36602 (McLachlin CJ, Cromwell and Côté JJ.) (1......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
4 books & journal articles
  • THE RACE TO THE BOTTOM: COMITY AND COOPERATION IN GLOBAL INTERNET TAKEDOWN ORDERS.
    • Canada
    • December 1, 2020
    ...A liance Bond Fund , Inc, 527 US 308 (1999). (26) See Equustek SCC, supra note 1 at paras 5-9. (27) See Equustek Solutions Inc v Jack, 2014 BCSC 1063 [Equustek (28) See Equustek BCCA, supra note 15. (29) Unfortunately, through all of this, the underlying intellectual property claims were......
  • Jurisdiction In Personam
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Conflict of Laws. Second Edition
    • June 21, 2016
    ...may be served generally, or (ii) has nominated 54 Ibid. See the analysis in Equustek Solutions Inc v Google Inc, 2015 BCCA 265, aff’g 2014 BCSC 1063, leave to appeal to SCC granted, [2015] SCCA No 55 See, for example, Business Corporations Act, RSA 2000, c B-9, s 279; Extra Provincial Corpo......
  • Banks (and Other Nonparties) and Mareva Orders
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Mareva and Anton Piller preservation orders in Canada The Mareva Asset Preservation Order
    • June 24, 2017
    ...permits corporate nonparties to comply with their foreign legal obligations as they reasonably perceive them. Equustek Solutions v Jack, 2014 BCSC 1063 at paras The protective provisions of the Baltic proviso have been refined as follows: It is further ordered and directed that nothing in t......
  • Vie privee et 'droit a l'oubli': que fait le Canada?
    • Canada
    • University of New Brunswick Law Journal No. 66, January - January 2015
    • January 1, 2015
    ...Ibid, par 360-361 (45) Mike Wagner and Yun Li-Reilly, >, 72 Advocate Vancouver 823 (2014), p 827. (46) Equustek Solutions Inc. v Jack, 2014 BCSC 1063, par (47) Ibid. Voir notamment les par 57-60. (48) La Cour ontarienne utilise l'expression >. Jones v Tinge, op.cit., note 36. (42) Amy M Co......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT