Fehr et al. v. Canada (Attorney General) et al., 2015 ABQB 627

JudgeHillier, J.
CourtCourt of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
Case DateSeptember 02, 2015
Citations2015 ABQB 627;[2015] A.R. TBEd. OC.040

Fehr v. Can. (A.G.), [2015] A.R. TBEd. OC.040

MLB being edited

Currently being edited for A.R. - judgment temporarily in rough form.

Temp. Cite: [2015] A.R. TBEd. OC.040

Jacob Fehr, Robbie Fyn, Amarinder Singh Lall, Allan Dawson MacMullin, Arnold Donszelmann (applicants) v. Attorney General of Canada and The Institutional Head of Drumheller Institution (respondent)

(150773984X1; 2015 ABQB 627)

Indexed As: Fehr et al. v. Canada (Attorney General) et al.

Alberta Court of Queen's Bench

Judicial District of Edmonton

Hillier, J.

October 6, 2015.

Summary:

The applicants were serving prisoners at Drumheller Institution. They were convicted of offences which occurred while the Accelerated Parole Review regime was available. However, they were ineligible to benefit from that regime as they were sentenced after provisions of the Abolition of Early Parole Act (AEPA) came into effect on March 28, 2011. The applicants applied for a declaration that s. 10(1) of the AEPA violated their rights under s. 11(i) of the Charter.

The Alberta Court of Queen's Bench declared that s. 10(1) of the AEPA violated s. 11(i) of the Charter for those who offended prior to the AEPA coming into force on March 28, 2011 but were sentenced after that date, and it was accordingly of no force and effect in relation to those offenders.

Civil Rights - Topic 3765

Punishment - General - Variation of punishment after offence - Benefit of lesser punishment - See paragraphs 1 to 57.

Civil Rights - Topic 8416

Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms - Criminal proceedings - Right to lesser punishment where punishment varied - See paragraphs 1 to 57.

Criminal Law - Topic 5609

Punishments (sentence) - General principles - Right to benefit of lesser punishment - See paragraphs 1 to 57.

Criminal Law - Topic 5666.1

Punishments (sentence) - Imprisonment and parole - Accelerated parole - See paragraphs 1 to 57.

Counsel:

Alexander Millman, for the applicants;

Robert Drummond and Adam Pasichnyk, for the respondent.

This application was heard on September 2, 2015, before Hillier, J., of the Alberta Court of Queen's Bench, Judicial District of Edmonton, who delivered the following judgment on October 6, 2015.

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 practice notes
  • Les impasses theoriques et pratiques du Controle de constitutionnalite canadien.
    • Canada
    • McGill Law Journal Vol. 66 No. 3, March 2021
    • March 1, 2021
    ...supra note 192; Nucci et al v Canada (AG), 2015 MBCA 122 au para 18; Canada (AG) v Lewis, 2015 ONCA 379 au para 24; Fehr v Canada (AG), 2015 ABQB 627 aux para (248) Voir Strayer, supra note 20 aux pp 193-95. (249) Dans R v EJB (supra note 192), la Couronne de l'Alberta a ainsi defendu avec ......
  • R. v. White (R.J.), 2016 ABQB 24
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • January 12, 2016
    ...pre-trial and pre-sentence custody, relying on R v RS , 2015 ONCA 291, Lewis v Canada (Attorney General) , 2015 ONCA 379, Fehr v Canada , 2015 ABQB 627, R v Clarke , 2014 SCC 28 and R v Wust , 2000 SCC 18. [21] The defence argues in the alternative that the Truth in Sentencing Act should no......
1 cases
  • R. v. White (R.J.), 2016 ABQB 24
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • January 12, 2016
    ...pre-trial and pre-sentence custody, relying on R v RS , 2015 ONCA 291, Lewis v Canada (Attorney General) , 2015 ONCA 379, Fehr v Canada , 2015 ABQB 627, R v Clarke , 2014 SCC 28 and R v Wust , 2000 SCC 18. [21] The defence argues in the alternative that the Truth in Sentencing Act should no......
1 books & journal articles
  • Les impasses theoriques et pratiques du Controle de constitutionnalite canadien.
    • Canada
    • McGill Law Journal Vol. 66 No. 3, March 2021
    • March 1, 2021
    ...supra note 192; Nucci et al v Canada (AG), 2015 MBCA 122 au para 18; Canada (AG) v Lewis, 2015 ONCA 379 au para 24; Fehr v Canada (AG), 2015 ABQB 627 aux para (248) Voir Strayer, supra note 20 aux pp 193-95. (249) Dans R v EJB (supra note 192), la Couronne de l'Alberta a ainsi defendu avec ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT