Flying Frog Trading Co., Ltd. v. Amer Sports OYJ, 2018 BCCA 384
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Judge | The Honourable Madam Justice D. Smith,The Honourable Mr. Justice Willcock,The Honourable Mr. Justice Fitch |
| Citation | 2018 BCCA 384 |
| Docket Number | CA44895 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (British Columbia) |
| Date | 14 September 2018 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
6 practice notes
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (February 27, 2023 ' March 3, 2023)
...The Manitoba Public Insurance Corporation, 2022 MBCA 57, Zhao v. Fang, 2022 BCCA 227, Flying Frog Trading Co., Ltd. v. Amer Sports OYJ, 2018 BCCA 384, Saskatchewan Power Corporation v Mitsubishi Power Canada Ltd., 2022 SKQB 147, Toews v. Grand Palladium Vallarta Resort & Spa, 2016 ABCA 408,......
-
Saskatchewan Power Corporation v Mitsubishi Power Canada Ltd.,
...party is expressly referred to in the contract that is the subject of the action: Flying Frog Trading Co., Ltd. v Amer Sports OYJ, 2018 BCCA 384 at paras 11 and Element 2: Events Flow From the Contractual Relationship [109] &#......
-
2023 ONCA 142,
...Columbia has gone the extra step to explicitly reject Côté J.'s dissent: Flying Frog Trading Co., Ltd. v. Amer Sports OYJ, 2018 BCCA 384, 427 D.L.R. (4th) 483, at paras. 58 Post-Cassels Brock jurisprudence has followed the majority's decision in applying the proposition ......
-
Sinclair v Amex Canada Inc.,
...Columbia has gone the extra step to explicitly reject Côté J.'s dissent: Flying Frog Trading Co., Ltd. v. Amer Sports OYJ, 2018 BCCA 384, 427 D.L.R. (4th) 483, at paras. 58 Post-Cassels Brock jurisprudence has followed the majority's decision in applying the proposition ......
Request a trial to view additional results
5 cases
-
Saskatchewan Power Corporation v Mitsubishi Power Canada Ltd.,
...party is expressly referred to in the contract that is the subject of the action: Flying Frog Trading Co., Ltd. v Amer Sports OYJ, 2018 BCCA 384 at paras 11 and Element 2: Events Flow From the Contractual Relationship [109] &#......
-
2023 ONCA 142,
...Columbia has gone the extra step to explicitly reject Côté J.'s dissent: Flying Frog Trading Co., Ltd. v. Amer Sports OYJ, 2018 BCCA 384, 427 D.L.R. (4th) 483, at paras. 58 Post-Cassels Brock jurisprudence has followed the majority's decision in applying the proposition ......
-
Sinclair v Amex Canada Inc.,
...Columbia has gone the extra step to explicitly reject Côté J.'s dissent: Flying Frog Trading Co., Ltd. v. Amer Sports OYJ, 2018 BCCA 384, 427 D.L.R. (4th) 483, at paras. 58 Post-Cassels Brock jurisprudence has followed the majority's decision in applying the proposition ......
-
Gaukel v. Buksh,
...in fact induced such a breach or interference; and that the plaintiff suffered damages: Flying Frog Trading Co., Ltd. v. Amer Sports OYJ, 2018 BCCA 384 at para. 23; Super-Save Enterprises Ltd. v. Del’s Propane Ltd., 2004 BCCA 183 at paras. 2-3. [267] ......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (February 27, 2023 ' March 3, 2023)
...The Manitoba Public Insurance Corporation, 2022 MBCA 57, Zhao v. Fang, 2022 BCCA 227, Flying Frog Trading Co., Ltd. v. Amer Sports OYJ, 2018 BCCA 384, Saskatchewan Power Corporation v Mitsubishi Power Canada Ltd., 2022 SKQB 147, Toews v. Grand Palladium Vallarta Resort & Spa, 2016 ABCA 408,......