Glover v. Kumar, [2012] A.R. Uned. 595 (QB)
| Judge | Hawco, J. |
| Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada) |
| Subject Matter | TRUSTS,EQUITY,MORTGAGES,REAL PROPERTY |
| Citation | [2012] A.R. Uned. 595 (QB),[2012] A.R. Uned. 595,2012 ABQB 516 |
| Date | 15 August 2012 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
2 practice notes
-
Ash (H.) & Associates Ltd. v. Banham, 2014 ABQB 718
...the $84,022.45 advanced to Ms. Banham was a gift or a loan. [14] Equity presumes bargains, not gifts: see for example, Glover v Kumar , 2012 ABQB 516 at paragraphs 41-43 and cases cited. [15] Ms. Banham deposes that in 2007, she had recently been discharged from bankruptcy and was emerging ......
-
Hillsboro Ventures Inc v Ceana Development Sunridge Inc,
...the writ cases proposed by the Applicants, these are not applicable to this situation (Drebert v Coates 2008 ABQB 684 and Glover v Kumar, 2012 ABQB 516). In writ situations, the writ creditor has not relied on the Torrens principle in order to forward the work of funds in question. Rather, ......
2 cases
-
Ash (H.) & Associates Ltd. v. Banham, 2014 ABQB 718
...the $84,022.45 advanced to Ms. Banham was a gift or a loan. [14] Equity presumes bargains, not gifts: see for example, Glover v Kumar , 2012 ABQB 516 at paragraphs 41-43 and cases cited. [15] Ms. Banham deposes that in 2007, she had recently been discharged from bankruptcy and was emerging ......
-
Hillsboro Ventures Inc v Ceana Development Sunridge Inc,
...the writ cases proposed by the Applicants, these are not applicable to this situation (Drebert v Coates 2008 ABQB 684 and Glover v Kumar, 2012 ABQB 516). In writ situations, the writ creditor has not relied on the Torrens principle in order to forward the work of funds in question. Rather, ......