Gosbjorn v. Krompocker Estate, [2008] B.C.T.C. Uned. E28
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Judge | Gray, J. |
| Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
| Subject Matter | PRACTICE,FAMILY LAW |
| Citation | [2008] B.C.T.C. Uned. E28,2008 BCSC 1614 |
| Date | 25 November 2008 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
8 practice notes
-
P.F. v. P.T., [2009] B.C.T.C. Uned. 674
...37B does not trigger the cost options set out in Rule 37B(5): Sandhu v. York Business Park Inc. , 2008 BCSC 1490; Gosbjorn v. Hadley , 2008 BCSC 1614, 44 E.T.R. (3d) 105; Stach v. Younger , 2009 BCSC 476 at para. 15; Lau v. Rai , 2009 BCSC 696, 72 C.P.C. (6th) 112; Wormell v. Hagen , 2009 B......
-
Ostiguy v. Hui, 2010 BCSC 641
...with the prescribed format is a proper basis to disregard the Offer. Specifically, she relies upon Gosbjorn v. Krompocker Estate , 2008 BCSC 1614, and Lau v. Rai , 2009 BCSC 696. [34] The defendants take the position that the determination of whether or not this is an offer entails a certai......
-
Knelsen Estate, 2020 BCSC 373
...with Ms. Wertz was “over”, was the impetus for the filing of her petition. Ms. Arnold relies on Gosbjorn v. Hadley, 2008 BCSC 1614; Lee v. Lee Estate (1993), 84 B.C.L.R. (2d) 341 (S.C.) [Lee Estate]; Leung v. Chang, 2014 BCSC 1243; and Dyson v. Moser, 2004 BCSC [9] ......
-
Sandhu v. Sandhu, [2011] B.C.T.C. Uned. 853
...11-1(1)(c)(iii). [47] Rule 11-1 is substantially the same as the former Rule 37B. I agree with the conclusions in Gosbjorn v. Hadley , 2008 BCSC 1614, and Lau v. Rai , 2009 BCSC 696, both decided under Rule 37B, that offers made under the former rules that are non-compliant with those rules......
Request a trial to view additional results
8 cases
-
P.F. v. P.T., [2009] B.C.T.C. Uned. 674
...37B does not trigger the cost options set out in Rule 37B(5): Sandhu v. York Business Park Inc. , 2008 BCSC 1490; Gosbjorn v. Hadley , 2008 BCSC 1614, 44 E.T.R. (3d) 105; Stach v. Younger , 2009 BCSC 476 at para. 15; Lau v. Rai , 2009 BCSC 696, 72 C.P.C. (6th) 112; Wormell v. Hagen , 2009 B......
-
Ostiguy v. Hui, 2010 BCSC 641
...with the prescribed format is a proper basis to disregard the Offer. Specifically, she relies upon Gosbjorn v. Krompocker Estate , 2008 BCSC 1614, and Lau v. Rai , 2009 BCSC 696. [34] The defendants take the position that the determination of whether or not this is an offer entails a certai......
-
Knelsen Estate, 2020 BCSC 373
...with Ms. Wertz was “over”, was the impetus for the filing of her petition. Ms. Arnold relies on Gosbjorn v. Hadley, 2008 BCSC 1614; Lee v. Lee Estate (1993), 84 B.C.L.R. (2d) 341 (S.C.) [Lee Estate]; Leung v. Chang, 2014 BCSC 1243; and Dyson v. Moser, 2004 BCSC [9] ......
-
Sandhu v. Sandhu, [2011] B.C.T.C. Uned. 853
...11-1(1)(c)(iii). [47] Rule 11-1 is substantially the same as the former Rule 37B. I agree with the conclusions in Gosbjorn v. Hadley , 2008 BCSC 1614, and Lau v. Rai , 2009 BCSC 696, both decided under Rule 37B, that offers made under the former rules that are non-compliant with those rules......
Request a trial to view additional results