Sandhu v. Sandhu, [2011] B.C.T.C. Uned. 853

JurisdictionBritish Columbia
JudgeFisher, J.
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
Subject MatterPRACTICE,FAMILY LAW
Citation[2011] B.C.T.C. Uned. 853,2011 BCSC 853,[2011] B.C.T.C. Uned. 853 (SC)
Date28 June 2011
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
23 practice notes
  • Mertz v. Symchyck, 2020 BCCA 113
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • 17 Abril 2020
    ...worthy of rebuke. The usual order in such circumstances is the sharing of report costs: L.E.G. v. A.G., 2003 BCSC 412; Sandhu v. Sandhu, 2011 BCSC 853. In all the circumstances of this case, I think that equally sharing is the fair [14] On May 2, 2019, Mr. Symchyck’s counsel received a tele......
  • K.D.R.A. v. Y.J.A.A., 2015 BCSC 430
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 19 Marzo 2015
    ...at trial. [30] The basis for an award of special costs in family law cases was reviewed by Justice Fisher in Sandhu v. Sandhu , 2011 BCSC 853, at para. 57: [57] Special costs may be awarded when a party has engaged in reprehensible conduct. This encompasses conduct that is scandalous, outra......
  • Sandhu v. Sandhu, [2012] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1183
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 7 Agosto 2012
    ...to costs against Dalbinder, that Kundan was entitled to her costs, and I dismissed the motions for double costs. Full reasons are at 2011 BCSC 853. [6] On September 23, 2011, Julie's counsel served her bill of costs on Dalbinder's counsel. The amount claimed was $124,480. Three days later, ......
  • 2023 BCSC 940,
    • Canada
    • 1 Enero 2023
    ...usual order was made to share the report costs equally. A similar result occurred in L.E.G. v. A.G., 2003 BCSC 412 and Sandhu v. Sandhu, 2011 BCSC 853. Other cases have directed that the parties share the costs of such reports in proportion to the respective incomes including A.M.F.D. v. S.......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
23 cases
  • Mertz v. Symchyck, 2020 BCCA 113
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • 17 Abril 2020
    ...worthy of rebuke. The usual order in such circumstances is the sharing of report costs: L.E.G. v. A.G., 2003 BCSC 412; Sandhu v. Sandhu, 2011 BCSC 853. In all the circumstances of this case, I think that equally sharing is the fair [14] On May 2, 2019, Mr. Symchyck’s counsel received a tele......
  • K.D.R.A. v. Y.J.A.A., 2015 BCSC 430
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 19 Marzo 2015
    ...at trial. [30] The basis for an award of special costs in family law cases was reviewed by Justice Fisher in Sandhu v. Sandhu , 2011 BCSC 853, at para. 57: [57] Special costs may be awarded when a party has engaged in reprehensible conduct. This encompasses conduct that is scandalous, outra......
  • Sandhu v. Sandhu, [2012] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1183
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 7 Agosto 2012
    ...to costs against Dalbinder, that Kundan was entitled to her costs, and I dismissed the motions for double costs. Full reasons are at 2011 BCSC 853. [6] On September 23, 2011, Julie's counsel served her bill of costs on Dalbinder's counsel. The amount claimed was $124,480. Three days later, ......
  • 2023 BCSC 940,
    • Canada
    • 1 Enero 2023
    ...usual order was made to share the report costs equally. A similar result occurred in L.E.G. v. A.G., 2003 BCSC 412 and Sandhu v. Sandhu, 2011 BCSC 853. Other cases have directed that the parties share the costs of such reports in proportion to the respective incomes including A.M.F.D. v. S.......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT