Gray v. Gray, 2017 ONCA 100

JurisdictionOntario
JudgeDoherty,MacPherson,Lauwers
Citation2017 ONCA 100
CourtCourt of Appeal (Ontario)
Date08 February 2017
Docket NumberM47093 (C62304)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
57 practice notes
  • Canadian Broadcasting Corp. v. Manitoba,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • September 24, 2021
    ...316, 58 Alta. L.R. (6th) 209; Canadian Planning and Design Consultants Inc. v. Libya (State), 2015 ONCA 661, 340 O.A.C. 98; Gray v. Gray, 2017 ONCA 100, 137 O.R. (3d) 65; MK Engineering Inc. v. Assn. of Professional Engineers and Geoscientists of Alberta Appeal Board, 2014 ABCA 58, 68 Admin......
  • COURT OF APPEAL SUMMARIES (JANUARY 18 – 22, 2021)
    • Canada
    • LexBlog Canada
    • January 24, 2021
    ...Fraud, Misrepresentation, Family Law Rules, O. Reg. 114/99, ss. 25(19), 25(19)(a), Ketelaars v. Ketelaars, 2011 ONCA 349, Gray v. Gray, 2017 ONCA 100 Kaynes v. BP p.l.c. , 2021 ONCA 36 Keywords: Securities Law, Misrepresentation, Fraudulent Misrepresentation, Civil Procedure, Striking Ple......
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (May 15, 2023 ' May 19, 2023)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • May 30, 2023
    ...ONSC 719, Drygala v. Pauli (2002), 61 O.R. (3d) 711 (C.A.), Dickie v. Dickie, 2007 SCC 8, Lamothe v. Ellis, 2022 ONCA 789, Gray v. Gray, 2017 ONCA 100, Wewaykum Indian Band v. Canada, 2003 SCC 45, R. v. S. (R.D.), [1997] 3 S.C.R. 484, Bailey v. Barbour, 2012 ONCA 325 Catholic Children's Aid......
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (January 18 ' 22, 2021)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • January 25, 2021
    ...Fraud, Misrepresentation, Family Law Rules, O. Reg. 114/99, ss. 25(19), 25(19)(a), Ketelaars v. Ketelaars, 2011 ONCA 349, Gray v. Gray, 2017 ONCA 100 Kaynes v. BP p.l.c. , 2021 ONCA 36 Keywords: Securities Law, Misrepresentation, Fraudulent Misrepresentation, Civil Procedure, Striking Plead......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
50 cases
  • Canadian Broadcasting Corp. v. Manitoba,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • September 24, 2021
    ...316, 58 Alta. L.R. (6th) 209; Canadian Planning and Design Consultants Inc. v. Libya (State), 2015 ONCA 661, 340 O.A.C. 98; Gray v. Gray, 2017 ONCA 100, 137 O.R. (3d) 65; MK Engineering Inc. v. Assn. of Professional Engineers and Geoscientists of Alberta Appeal Board, 2014 ABCA 58, 68 Admin......
  • Brown v. Forrester,
    • Canada
    • Ontario Court of Justice General Division (Canada)
    • April 14, 2023
    ...reason satisfactory to the court, to be present.  [19]           In Gray v. Gray, 2017 ONCA 100, the Court of Appeal held that there is authority to set aside an order under subrule 25 (19). In doing so, the court held (a)  &#......
  • E.H. v. O.K., 2018 ONCJ 578
    • Canada
    • Ontario Court of Justice General Division (Canada)
    • August 27, 2018
    ...Rules should a court decide the issue with respect to the civil rules. This approach was followed by the Court of Appeal in Gray v. Gray, 2017 ONCA 100. [36] The Family Law Rules do not contain civil rules costs concepts such as “substantial indemnity”, “partial indemnity” and “partial reco......
  • CAS v. B.H., 2017 ONSC 4799
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • August 10, 2017
    ...[110] The FLRs are intended to be a complete procedural code and references to the Rules are meant to be the exception. In Gray v. Gray, 2017 ONCA 100, Justice MacPherson referred to Justice Benotto’s decision in Frick v. Frick, 2016 ONCA 799, 132 O.R. (3d) 321 (Ont. As Benotto J.A. stated ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
5 firm's commentaries
  • COURT OF APPEAL SUMMARIES (JANUARY 18 – 22, 2021)
    • Canada
    • LexBlog Canada
    • January 24, 2021
    ...Fraud, Misrepresentation, Family Law Rules, O. Reg. 114/99, ss. 25(19), 25(19)(a), Ketelaars v. Ketelaars, 2011 ONCA 349, Gray v. Gray, 2017 ONCA 100 Kaynes v. BP p.l.c. , 2021 ONCA 36 Keywords: Securities Law, Misrepresentation, Fraudulent Misrepresentation, Civil Procedure, Striking Ple......
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (January 18 ' 22, 2021)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • January 25, 2021
    ...Fraud, Misrepresentation, Family Law Rules, O. Reg. 114/99, ss. 25(19), 25(19)(a), Ketelaars v. Ketelaars, 2011 ONCA 349, Gray v. Gray, 2017 ONCA 100 Kaynes v. BP p.l.c. , 2021 ONCA 36 Keywords: Securities Law, Misrepresentation, Fraudulent Misrepresentation, Civil Procedure, Striking Plead......
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (May 15, 2023 ' May 19, 2023)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • May 30, 2023
    ...ONSC 719, Drygala v. Pauli (2002), 61 O.R. (3d) 711 (C.A.), Dickie v. Dickie, 2007 SCC 8, Lamothe v. Ellis, 2022 ONCA 789, Gray v. Gray, 2017 ONCA 100, Wewaykum Indian Band v. Canada, 2003 SCC 45, R. v. S. (R.D.), [1997] 3 S.C.R. 484, Bailey v. Barbour, 2012 ONCA 325 Catholic Children's Aid......
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (February 6-10, 2017)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • February 23, 2017
    ...to the appellants that they might have a negligence claim against Mr. Good and should consult other counsel on the matter. Gray v. Gray, 2017 ONCA 100 [Doherty, MacPherson and Lauwers H. Tweyman, for the applicant Feldstein, for the respondent Boyd, for the Regional Municipality of Durham K......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
  • Evidence; Procedure; Costs
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Child Support Guidelines in Canada, 2022
    • July 27, 2022
    ...settled law in Ontario that rule 25(19) of the Family Law Rules gives a trial court jurisdiction to set aside an order. See Gray v. Gray, 2017 ONCA 100 (CanLII). The Rule states that the court may, on motion, change an order (a) was obtained by fraud; (b) contains a mistake; (c) needs to be......
  • Evidence; procedure; costs
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Child Support Guidelines in Canada, 2020
    • June 23, 2019
    ...settled law in Ontario that rule 25(19) of the Family Law Rules gives a trial court jurisdiction to set aside an order. See Gray v. Gray, 2017 ONCA 100 (CanLII). he Rule states that the court may, on motion, change an order that, (a) was obtained by fraud; (b) contains a mistake; (c) needs ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT