Hadland v. Reems et al., [2015] B.C.T.C. Uned. 115

JurisdictionBritish Columbia
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
Subject MatterPRACTICE
Date27 January 2015
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
6 practice notes
  • Heck v. Strathcona Park Lodge Ltd.,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • June 2, 2022
    ...be adjourned if leave is granted. In addition, the other cases relied on by the proposed third parties—Hadland v. Reems, 2015 BCSC 115 and Stephenson—were not attended by the same degree of complexity as the case before me. Is it just and convenient to grant or dismiss the app......
  • Kasian Estate v. Kasian,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • June 8, 2021
    ...be taken into account by the court in exercising its discretion: see, e.g., Tyson Creek at paras. 25–29; Hadland v. Reems, 2015 BCSC 115 at para. 26; Hendrix v. Handa Travel Student Trip Ltd., 2016 BCSC 620 at [51]        Finally, Mr. ......
  • Sohal v. Lezama, 2019 BCSC 1709
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • October 8, 2019
    ...within the new two-year limitation period applicable to such claims. The cases include, in chronological order: · Hadland v. Reems, 2015 BCSC 115 (Master Caldwell): personal injury claim arising from a 2010 motor vehicle accident. Defendant's Third Party Notice leave application filed April......
  • Dolden v. VGC Vancouver General Contractors Inc., 2020 BCSC 492
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • April 1, 2020
    ...sub-rule (a) as soon as possible or else provide a complete explanation for the delay: Tyson Creek (S.C.), at para. 66; Hadland v. Reems, 2015 BCSC 115, at para. 27. [15] In my view, VGC’s delay was substantial in the circumstances of this case, and not adequately explained to justify grant......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
6 cases
  • Heck v. Strathcona Park Lodge Ltd.,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • June 2, 2022
    ...be adjourned if leave is granted. In addition, the other cases relied on by the proposed third parties—Hadland v. Reems, 2015 BCSC 115 and Stephenson—were not attended by the same degree of complexity as the case before me. Is it just and convenient to grant or dismiss the app......
  • Kasian Estate v. Kasian,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • June 8, 2021
    ...be taken into account by the court in exercising its discretion: see, e.g., Tyson Creek at paras. 25–29; Hadland v. Reems, 2015 BCSC 115 at para. 26; Hendrix v. Handa Travel Student Trip Ltd., 2016 BCSC 620 at [51]        Finally, Mr. ......
  • Sohal v. Lezama, 2019 BCSC 1709
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • October 8, 2019
    ...within the new two-year limitation period applicable to such claims. The cases include, in chronological order: · Hadland v. Reems, 2015 BCSC 115 (Master Caldwell): personal injury claim arising from a 2010 motor vehicle accident. Defendant's Third Party Notice leave application filed April......
  • Dolden v. VGC Vancouver General Contractors Inc., 2020 BCSC 492
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • April 1, 2020
    ...sub-rule (a) as soon as possible or else provide a complete explanation for the delay: Tyson Creek (S.C.), at para. 66; Hadland v. Reems, 2015 BCSC 115, at para. 27. [15] In my view, VGC’s delay was substantial in the circumstances of this case, and not adequately explained to justify grant......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT