Sohal v. Lezama, 2019 BCSC 1709
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Judge | The Honourable Mr. Justice Kent |
| Citation | 2019 BCSC 1709 |
| Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
| Date | 08 October 2019 |
| Docket Number | M147109 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
18 practice notes
-
Arbutus Investment Management Ltd. v. Russell,
...and injunctive relief, it was not necessary for AIM to wait for actual damage to occur before commencing litigation: Sohal v. Lezama, 2019 BCSC 1709 at para. 49, aff’d 2021 BCCA 40. In any event, there is no evidence that AIM engaged in active business development after September 201......
-
Sohal v. Lezama,
...Honourable Mr. Justice Grauer On appeal from: An order of the Supreme Court of British Columbia, dated October 8, 2019 (Sohal v. Lezama, 2019 BCSC 1709, Vancouver Docket Counsel for the Appellants: V.G. Critchley J. Corbett Counsel for the Respondent: G. P. Brown, Q.C. E. LeDuc Place and Da......
-
2023 BCSC 242,
...with amendment of pleadings), Strother v. Darc, 2017 BCSC 348 (dealing with a refusal to permit addition of a party) and Sohal v. Lezama, 2019 BCSC 1709, aff'd 2021 BCCA 40 (dealing with leave to issue a third-party 22 The plaintiff says that the Master erred by failing to apply the co......
-
I4PG Hastings Street Inc. v Burnaby Dry Cleaners Ltd,
...with amendment of pleadings), Strother v. Darc, 2017 BCSC 348 (dealing with a refusal to permit addition of a party) and Sohal v. Lezama, 2019 BCSC 1709, aff'd 2021 BCCA 40 (dealing with leave to issue a third-party 22 The plaintiff says that the Master erred by failing to apply the co......
Request a trial to view additional results
17 cases
-
Arbutus Investment Management Ltd. v. Russell,
...and injunctive relief, it was not necessary for AIM to wait for actual damage to occur before commencing litigation: Sohal v. Lezama, 2019 BCSC 1709 at para. 49, aff’d 2021 BCCA 40. In any event, there is no evidence that AIM engaged in active business development after September 201......
-
Sohal v. Lezama,
...Honourable Mr. Justice Grauer On appeal from: An order of the Supreme Court of British Columbia, dated October 8, 2019 (Sohal v. Lezama, 2019 BCSC 1709, Vancouver Docket Counsel for the Appellants: V.G. Critchley J. Corbett Counsel for the Respondent: G. P. Brown, Q.C. E. LeDuc Place and Da......
-
2023 BCSC 242,
...with amendment of pleadings), Strother v. Darc, 2017 BCSC 348 (dealing with a refusal to permit addition of a party) and Sohal v. Lezama, 2019 BCSC 1709, aff'd 2021 BCCA 40 (dealing with leave to issue a third-party 22 The plaintiff says that the Master erred by failing to apply the co......
-
I4PG Hastings Street Inc. v Burnaby Dry Cleaners Ltd,
...with amendment of pleadings), Strother v. Darc, 2017 BCSC 348 (dealing with a refusal to permit addition of a party) and Sohal v. Lezama, 2019 BCSC 1709, aff'd 2021 BCCA 40 (dealing with leave to issue a third-party 22 The plaintiff says that the Master erred by failing to apply the co......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
-
Two Years Means Two Years: Judicial Clarification On The Limitation Periods For Third Party Contribution And Indemnity Claims
...One month after Dhanda was released, Mr. Justice Kent agreed and adopted Master Elwood's analysis and conclusion in Sohal v. Lezama, 2019 BCSC 1709. Dhanda and Sohal were determined in the context of motor vehicle accident claims. However, third party proceedings are commonplace in many pra......