Haghir v University Appeal Board, 2019 SKCA 13
| Jurisdiction | Saskatchewan |
| Judge | Jackson,Whitmore,Ryan-Forslie |
| Citation | 2019 SKCA 13 |
| Date | 30 January 2019 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan) |
| Docket Number | CACV3072 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 practice notes
-
DANYCHUK v. THE UNIVERSITY OF REGINA,
...mental health concerns were specifically dealt with by an institution and accommodation was discussed: Haghir v University Appeal Board, 2019 SKCA 13, 54 Admin LR (6th) 24; University of British Columbia v Kelly, 2016 BCCA 271, 87 BCLR (5th) 313; Longueépée v University of Waterlo......
-
MICHEL v. THE JOINT MEDICAL PROFESSIONAL REVIEW COMMITTEE, 2019 SKQB 209
...1 SCR 591; Haghir v University Appeal Board, 2019 SKCA 13 at para 95. [15] Dr. Michel also submits there is one true question of jurisdiction: is the Committee entitled to reassess a physician’s billings on the basis of the legibility and content of the physician’s records? In my view, this......
-
Danychuk v University of Regina,
...dealt with by an institution and accommodation was discussed” (at para 43). He distinguished Haghir v University Appeal Board, 2019 SKCA 13, 54 Admin LR (6th) 24, University of British Columbia v Kelly, 2016 BCCA 271, 87 BCLR (5th) 313, and Longueépée v University of Waterl......
3 cases
-
DANYCHUK v. THE UNIVERSITY OF REGINA,
...mental health concerns were specifically dealt with by an institution and accommodation was discussed: Haghir v University Appeal Board, 2019 SKCA 13, 54 Admin LR (6th) 24; University of British Columbia v Kelly, 2016 BCCA 271, 87 BCLR (5th) 313; Longueépée v University of Waterlo......
-
MICHEL v. THE JOINT MEDICAL PROFESSIONAL REVIEW COMMITTEE, 2019 SKQB 209
...1 SCR 591; Haghir v University Appeal Board, 2019 SKCA 13 at para 95. [15] Dr. Michel also submits there is one true question of jurisdiction: is the Committee entitled to reassess a physician’s billings on the basis of the legibility and content of the physician’s records? In my view, this......
-
Danychuk v University of Regina,
...dealt with by an institution and accommodation was discussed” (at para 43). He distinguished Haghir v University Appeal Board, 2019 SKCA 13, 54 Admin LR (6th) 24, University of British Columbia v Kelly, 2016 BCCA 271, 87 BCLR (5th) 313, and Longueépée v University of Waterl......