Haig v. Whitmore, 2015 ABQB 267

JudgeYamauchi, J.
CourtCourt of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
Subject MatterFAMILY LAW,PRACTICE
Citation2015 ABQB 267,[2015] A.R. Uned. 294,[2015] A.R. Uned. 294 (QB)
Date23 April 2015
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
17 practice notes
  • Child Support on or after Divorce
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Canadian Family Law. Eighth Edition
    • 3 Agosto 2020
    ...tax returns or other available data, is often predictive of a spouse’s current annual income and may be relied 457 Haig v Whitmore, 2015 ABQB 267; LS v DS, 2017 ABQB 584; McKenzie v Perestrelo, 2014 BCCA 161 at paras 82–83; CAM v TCH, 2016 BCSC 1756; Belot v Connelly, 2013 MBQB 98 at paras ......
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Child Support Guidelines in Canada, 2022
    • 27 Julio 2022
    ...571, 17 RFL (5th) 330 (QB)........................................................................................ 372 Haig v Whitmore, 2015 ABQB 267............................................................................................................................145 Haigh v Haigh ......
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Child Support Guidelines in Canada, 2020
    • 23 Junio 2019
    ...571, 17 RFL (5th) 330 (QB) ........................................................................................355 Haig v Whitmore, 2015 ABQB 267 .......................................................................................................................... 140 Haigh v Haigh ......
  • Determination of Income; Disclosure of Income
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Child Support Guidelines in Canada, 2022
    • 27 Julio 2022
    ...Compare Belot v Connelly, 2013 MBQB 98; Owen v Owen, 2015 ONSC 4002, citing Difede v Difede, [2007] OJ No 622 (SCJ). 180 Haig v Whitmore, 2015 ABQB 267; McKenzie v Perestrelo, 2014 BCCA 161 at paras 82–83; CAM v TCH, 2016 BCSC 1756; Belot v Connelly, 2013 MBQB 98 at paras 68–70; Kelland v S......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
11 cases
  • L.A.U. v. I.B.U., [2016] A.R. Uned. 124 (QB)
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 9 Febrero 2016
    ...point in a case such as this: the authorities already mentioned, but also Kent v Kent, 2011 ABQB 611 at para 21; Haig v Whitmore , 2015 ABQB 267, at para 74. [237] The ultimate costs are of course within the court's discretion. [238] Rule 10.33(1) provides a number of considerations that a ......
  • FDM v EGM,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 28 Mayo 2021
    ...for in the division of assets and had been used to fund legal fees, or where the amount was used to repay joint debt: Haig v Whitmore, 2015 ABQB 267 at para 41 citing McKenzie v Perestrelo, 2014 BCCA 161 at para 82; Fraser v Fraser, 2013 ONCA 715 at para [182] In this case, the majority of ......
  • LL v DB, 2018 ABQB 886
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 30 Octubre 2018
    ...particularly where payors withdraw funds to acquire assets or pay expenses, or where the withdrawals were unexplained: Haig v Whitmore, 2015 ABQB 267 (Yamauchi J) at para. 4. whether RRSP withdrawals should be included in income turns on the facts of case case: Choucair v Choucair, 2012 ABQ......
  • P.J.M. v. R.H.M., 2016 ABQB 91
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 9 Febrero 2016
    ...granted. Nonetheless, it would not be appropriate to "parse out" and allocate costs in relation to particular issues: Haig v Whitmore , 2015 ABQB 267, Yamauchi J at paras 68 and 69. Ms. M. is entitled to her costs under Column 1 of Schedule C. [End of document] Mr. M.'s position prevailed r......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
6 books & journal articles
  • Child Support on or after Divorce
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Canadian Family Law. Eighth Edition
    • 3 Agosto 2020
    ...tax returns or other available data, is often predictive of a spouse’s current annual income and may be relied 457 Haig v Whitmore, 2015 ABQB 267; LS v DS, 2017 ABQB 584; McKenzie v Perestrelo, 2014 BCCA 161 at paras 82–83; CAM v TCH, 2016 BCSC 1756; Belot v Connelly, 2013 MBQB 98 at paras ......
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Child Support Guidelines in Canada, 2022
    • 27 Julio 2022
    ...571, 17 RFL (5th) 330 (QB)........................................................................................ 372 Haig v Whitmore, 2015 ABQB 267............................................................................................................................145 Haigh v Haigh ......
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Child Support Guidelines in Canada, 2020
    • 23 Junio 2019
    ...571, 17 RFL (5th) 330 (QB) ........................................................................................355 Haig v Whitmore, 2015 ABQB 267 .......................................................................................................................... 140 Haigh v Haigh ......
  • Determination of Income; Disclosure of Income
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Child Support Guidelines in Canada, 2022
    • 27 Julio 2022
    ...Compare Belot v Connelly, 2013 MBQB 98; Owen v Owen, 2015 ONSC 4002, citing Difede v Difede, [2007] OJ No 622 (SCJ). 180 Haig v Whitmore, 2015 ABQB 267; McKenzie v Perestrelo, 2014 BCCA 161 at paras 82–83; CAM v TCH, 2016 BCSC 1756; Belot v Connelly, 2013 MBQB 98 at paras 68–70; Kelland v S......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT