Haque v. Canada (Attorney General), 2018 FC 651
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
| Citation | 2018 FC 651 |
| Date | 22 June 2018 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
5 practice notes
-
Lum v. Canada (Attorney General), 2020 FC 797
...of the duty of procedural fairness (see Makavitch v Canada (Attorney General), 2019 FC 940 at para 29; Haque v Canada (Attorney General), 2018 FC 651 at paras 62-63 [Haque]). Regardless, in my view, this factor weighs in the Applicants’ favour in terms of greater procedural fairness. As doe......
-
Jackson v. Canada (Attorney General), 2021 FC 1326
...Minister, and then the Minister’s decision, are rendered. [42] A similar approach was adopted in Haque v Canada (Attorney General), 2018 FC 651 at para 64 [Haque], in which Justice John Norris noted that the current policy approach provides applicants with a fair process in accordanc......
-
Ritchie v. Canada (Attorney General), 2020 FC 342
...and law (Vavilov at paras 85-86, citing Dunsmuir v New Brunswick, 2008 SCC 9 [Dunsmuir] at para 47; Haque v Canada (Attorney General), 2018 FC 651 [Haque] at para 55). [16] Procedural fairness is a matter for the Court to determine. The standard for determining whether the decision-maker co......
-
Makavitch v. Canada (Attorney General), 2019 FC 940
...as to the meaning of “minimal” in the context of the refusal to issue an initial security clearance: Haque v Canada (Attorney General), 2018 FC 651 at paras 60 – 63 [Haque]. [30] Arguably, as Mr. Makavitch at the time he applied for the Enhanced RS clearance already held a Top Secret cleara......
Get Started for Free
5 cases
-
Lum v. Canada (Attorney General), 2020 FC 797
...of the duty of procedural fairness (see Makavitch v Canada (Attorney General), 2019 FC 940 at para 29; Haque v Canada (Attorney General), 2018 FC 651 at paras 62-63 [Haque]). Regardless, in my view, this factor weighs in the Applicants’ favour in terms of greater procedural fairness. As doe......
-
Jackson v. Canada (Attorney General), 2021 FC 1326
...Minister, and then the Minister’s decision, are rendered. [42] A similar approach was adopted in Haque v Canada (Attorney General), 2018 FC 651 at para 64 [Haque], in which Justice John Norris noted that the current policy approach provides applicants with a fair process in accordanc......
-
Ritchie v. Canada (Attorney General), 2020 FC 342
...and law (Vavilov at paras 85-86, citing Dunsmuir v New Brunswick, 2008 SCC 9 [Dunsmuir] at para 47; Haque v Canada (Attorney General), 2018 FC 651 [Haque] at para 55). [16] Procedural fairness is a matter for the Court to determine. The standard for determining whether the decision-maker co......
-
Makavitch v. Canada (Attorney General), 2019 FC 940
...as to the meaning of “minimal” in the context of the refusal to issue an initial security clearance: Haque v Canada (Attorney General), 2018 FC 651 at paras 60 – 63 [Haque]. [30] Arguably, as Mr. Makavitch at the time he applied for the Enhanced RS clearance already held a Top Secret cleara......
Get Started for Free