Haug v. Dorchester Instutition (Warden) et al., 2016 SKCA 55
| Judge | Jackson, Caldwell and Ryan-Froslie, JJ.A. |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan) |
| Case Date | April 20, 2016 |
| Jurisdiction | Saskatchewan |
| Citations | 2016 SKCA 55;[2016] Sask.R. Uned. 47;[2016] Sask.R. Uned. 47 (CA) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
6 practice notes
-
AB v College of Physicians and Surgeons of Alberta,
...opportunity to further an appeal that exists in connection with a denial of a judicial review motion”); Haug v. Dorchester Institution, 2016 SKCA 55, ¶ 3; [2016] 10 W.W.R. 484, 490 (“[under s. 20(1) of the Court of Appeal Act, 2000] a single judge of this Court sitting in chambers has broad......
-
Veolia Water Technologies, Inc. v K+S Potash Canada General Partnership, 2018 SKCA 61
...the appeal on the merits and, at the same time, would insure the appeal does not become moot. It cites Haug v Dorchester Institution, 2016 SKCA 55, [2016] 10 WWR 484: [3] To begin, as is evident by the language of s. 20(1) of The Court of Appeal Act, 2000, a single judge of this Court sitti......
-
Digest: Veolia Water Technologies, Inc. v K+S Potash Canada General Partnership, 2018 SKCA 61
...SKCA 44, 414 Sask R 66 Blackwoods Beverages Ltd. v Dairy Workers (1956), 3 DLR (2d) 529, 18 WWR (NS) 481 Haug v Dorchester Institution, 2016 SKCA 55, [2016] 10 WWR 484 Kim v University of Regina, 85 Sask R 166 Loraas v Loraas (Unreported), SaskCA, CACV3244, May 15/18, Ryan-Froslie JA Manito......
-
Yorkton (City) v Mi-Sask Industries Ltd., 2020 SKCA 109
...Legal Professional Corporation v Vo, 2016 SKCA 50 at para 2, 476 Sask R 269 (citing Mann at para 14); and Haug v Dorchester Institution, 2016 SKCA 55 at para 3, [2016] 10 WWR 484 [Haug]. [38] As well, there is authority for the proposition that a single judge in Chambers has the power under......
Request a trial to view additional results
5 cases
-
AB v College of Physicians and Surgeons of Alberta,
...opportunity to further an appeal that exists in connection with a denial of a judicial review motion”); Haug v. Dorchester Institution, 2016 SKCA 55, ¶ 3; [2016] 10 W.W.R. 484, 490 (“[under s. 20(1) of the Court of Appeal Act, 2000] a single judge of this Court sitting in chambers has broad......
-
Veolia Water Technologies, Inc. v K+S Potash Canada General Partnership, 2018 SKCA 61
...the appeal on the merits and, at the same time, would insure the appeal does not become moot. It cites Haug v Dorchester Institution, 2016 SKCA 55, [2016] 10 WWR 484: [3] To begin, as is evident by the language of s. 20(1) of The Court of Appeal Act, 2000, a single judge of this Court sitti......
-
Yorkton (City) v Mi-Sask Industries Ltd., 2020 SKCA 109
...Legal Professional Corporation v Vo, 2016 SKCA 50 at para 2, 476 Sask R 269 (citing Mann at para 14); and Haug v Dorchester Institution, 2016 SKCA 55 at para 3, [2016] 10 WWR 484 [Haug]. [38] As well, there is authority for the proposition that a single judge in Chambers has the power under......
-
Richardson v Richardson,
...can only be exercised by “the court”, meaning a panel of judges and not a single judge sitting in Chambers (Haug v Dorchester Institution, 2016 SKCA 55 at para 17, [2016] 10 WWR [21] Moreover, even if the Court of Appeal Act could be read as giving a single judge of this Court sitting in Ch......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Digest: Veolia Water Technologies, Inc. v K+S Potash Canada General Partnership, 2018 SKCA 61
...SKCA 44, 414 Sask R 66 Blackwoods Beverages Ltd. v Dairy Workers (1956), 3 DLR (2d) 529, 18 WWR (NS) 481 Haug v Dorchester Institution, 2016 SKCA 55, [2016] 10 WWR 484 Kim v University of Regina, 85 Sask R 166 Loraas v Loraas (Unreported), SaskCA, CACV3244, May 15/18, Ryan-Froslie JA Manito......