Hoo v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) et al., 2016 FC 283
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Judge | Strickland, J. |
| Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
| Subject Matter | IMMIGRATION AND REFUGEE |
| Citation | 2016 FC 283,[2016] F.T.R. Uned. 70 (FC),[2016] F.T.R. Uned. 70 |
| Date | 04 March 2016 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 practice notes
-
Newland v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 1418
...and Immigration), 2013 FC 549, Johnson v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2017 FC 68 and Hoo v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 283, each of which involve assessments of adequate state protection in Jamaica in the context of gang violence. None of these cases compels a par......
-
Go v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) et al., 2016 FC 1021
...of mixed fact and law to which the reasonableness standard of review applies (Hoo v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 283 at para III. Analysis A. Did the Officer err in identifying the test for state protection? [11] Ms. Go submits that the Officer adopted the wrong......
-
Kulla v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2017 FC 737
...including its assessment of risk and whether the presumption of state protection has been rebutted, is reasonableness (Hoo v Canada (MCI), 2016 FC 283 at para 8). In applying the standard of reasonableness, the Court is concerned with the justification, transparency and intelligibility of t......
3 cases
-
Newland v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 1418
...and Immigration), 2013 FC 549, Johnson v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2017 FC 68 and Hoo v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 283, each of which involve assessments of adequate state protection in Jamaica in the context of gang violence. None of these cases compels a par......
-
Go v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) et al., 2016 FC 1021
...of mixed fact and law to which the reasonableness standard of review applies (Hoo v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 283 at para III. Analysis A. Did the Officer err in identifying the test for state protection? [11] Ms. Go submits that the Officer adopted the wrong......
-
Kulla v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2017 FC 737
...including its assessment of risk and whether the presumption of state protection has been rebutted, is reasonableness (Hoo v Canada (MCI), 2016 FC 283 at para 8). In applying the standard of reasonableness, the Court is concerned with the justification, transparency and intelligibility of t......