Hospira Healthcare Corp. v. Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology, 2015 FC 1292

JudgeKane, J.
CourtFederal Court (Canada)
Case DateNovember 18, 2015
JurisdictionCanada (Federal)
Citations2015 FC 1292
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
5 practice notes
  • Litigation — Year In Review
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • 2 Marzo 2016
    ...also addressed by the Court in the following Federal Court decisions: Hospira Healthcare Corporation v Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology, 2015 FC 1292 at 59-60, 67-68; Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc v WL Gore & Associates, Inc, 2015 FC 1176 at paras 21-22; MediaTube Corp et al v Bell Can......
  • Bauer Hockey Ltd v. Sport Maska Inc., 2020 FC 212
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • 6 Febrero 2020
    ...and defence. [4] Discovery also allows a party to know the case to meet (Hospira Healthcare Corp v Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology, 2015 FC 1292 at paragraph 36) and helps prevent situations where a party is “being taken by surprise at trial” (Canada v Lehigh Cement Ltd, 2011 FCA 120 at p......
  • Biogen Canada Inc. v. Taro Pharmaceuticals Inc., 2019 FC 942
    • Canada
    • Canada (Federal) Federal Court (Canada)
    • 15 Julio 2019
    ...only in respect of its own information. (See discussion and cases cited in Hospira Healthcare Group v Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology 2015 FC 1292 at paras 92 to 95). [24]  The task of going through discovery transcripts to find, identify and extract information that is both relevant......
  • Class Action Certification Against Pfizer For An Allegation Of Unlawful Abuse Of The Patent System Is Overturned (Intellectual Property Weekly Abstracts Bulletin — Week Of December 14)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • 18 Diciembre 2015
    ...Appeal from motion to compel answers arising from discovery dismissed Hospira Healthcare Corporation v. Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology, 2015 FC 1292 The appellants (Hospira) brought a motion to compel answers to 354 questions refused or taken under advisement at the discovery of the resp......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
3 cases
  • Bauer Hockey Ltd v. Sport Maska Inc., 2020 FC 212
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • 6 Febrero 2020
    ...and defence. [4] Discovery also allows a party to know the case to meet (Hospira Healthcare Corp v Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology, 2015 FC 1292 at paragraph 36) and helps prevent situations where a party is “being taken by surprise at trial” (Canada v Lehigh Cement Ltd, 2011 FCA 120 at p......
  • Biogen Canada Inc. v. Taro Pharmaceuticals Inc., 2019 FC 942
    • Canada
    • Canada (Federal) Federal Court (Canada)
    • 15 Julio 2019
    ...only in respect of its own information. (See discussion and cases cited in Hospira Healthcare Group v Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology 2015 FC 1292 at paras 92 to 95). [24]  The task of going through discovery transcripts to find, identify and extract information that is both relevant......
  • Celgene Inc. v. Natco Pharma (Canada) Inc., 2019 FC 921
    • Canada
    • Canada (Federal) Federal Court (Canada)
    • 11 Julio 2019
    ...and generally not compellable at the discovery stage:  see Hospira Healthcare Corporation v Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology, 2015 FC 1292 at paras 91-95, 261 ACWS 3d 57, and Apotex Inc v Sanofi-Aventis Canada Inc, 2011 FC 52 at para 66, [2011] FCJ No 402.  [7]  I ......
2 firm's commentaries

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT