Huang v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 1439
| Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
| Case Date | November 15, 2019 |
| Jurisdiction | Canada (Federal) |
| Citations | 2019 FC 1439 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 practice notes
-
Hussain v. Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2022 FC 1412
...FC 984 at para 34; Ullah v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2011 FC 221 at para 25; Huang v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 1439 at para 41). [25] The Applicant argues that the Officer made a veiled credibility finding under the cover of insufficiency or lack of probative......
-
Forbes v. Canada (Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship),
...central to the decision and which, if accepted, would justify allowing the application [see Huang v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 1439 at para 41]. [23] The Applicant asserts that the PRRA Officer erred by making unsupported, veiled credibility findings that were central to ......
-
Hare v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 763
...34, citing Ullah v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2011 FC 221; Huang 2018 at para 34; Huang v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 1439 at para 41; Abdillahi at para 19). [21] The first step in this analysis is to determine whether a credibility finding was made, and if it w......
-
Zhang v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 784
...decision and which, if accepted, would justify allowing the application” (Huang v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 1439 at para 41 [Huang]). In other words, applicants must be afforded the right to be able to respond to credibility concerns that are determina......
4 cases
-
Hussain v. Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2022 FC 1412
...FC 984 at para 34; Ullah v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2011 FC 221 at para 25; Huang v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 1439 at para 41). [25] The Applicant argues that the Officer made a veiled credibility finding under the cover of insufficiency or lack of probative......
-
Forbes v. Canada (Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship),
...central to the decision and which, if accepted, would justify allowing the application [see Huang v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 1439 at para 41]. [23] The Applicant asserts that the PRRA Officer erred by making unsupported, veiled credibility findings that were central to ......
-
Hare v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 763
...34, citing Ullah v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2011 FC 221; Huang 2018 at para 34; Huang v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 1439 at para 41; Abdillahi at para 19). [21] The first step in this analysis is to determine whether a credibility finding was made, and if it w......
-
Zhang v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 784
...decision and which, if accepted, would justify allowing the application” (Huang v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 1439 at para 41 [Huang]). In other words, applicants must be afforded the right to be able to respond to credibility concerns that are determina......