Ikeji v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 1422
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Subject Matter | ADMINISTRATIVE LAW,IMMIGRATION AND REFUGEE,CRIMINAL LAW,EVIDENCE,PRACTICE |
| Citation | 2016 FC 1422 |
| Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
| Date | 03 January 2017 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
23 practice notes
-
Sundralingam v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 1768
...FC 788 at para 14; AB v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2017 FC 629 at para 33; Ikeji v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 1422 at paras 33 and 50; Ferguson v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2008 FC 1067 at paras 23-24. [21] I begin my analysis with a review of t......
-
Hussain v. Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2022 FC 1412
...Borbon Marte v Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2010 FC 930 at para 40; Ikeji v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 1422 at para 50, and; Garces Canga v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 749 at para 28). [20] The Applicant filed his PRRA Application i......
-
Iwekaeze v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 814
...it is up to them to put their “best foot forward” to meet this onus: Ferguson at para 22; Ikeji v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 1422 at para 47; Nhegu v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 913 at para 6. It is reasonable for an officer reviewing a PRRA application ......
-
Jystina v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 912
...to establish their claim, and to put their “best foot forward” (Jama at para 23; see also Ikeji v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 1422 at para 47). [15] The present circumstances do not warrant a departure from this rule. Accordingly, to the extent that statements in the Appli......
Request a trial to view additional results
23 cases
-
Sundralingam v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 1768
...FC 788 at para 14; AB v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2017 FC 629 at para 33; Ikeji v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 1422 at paras 33 and 50; Ferguson v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2008 FC 1067 at paras 23-24. [21] I begin my analysis with a review of t......
-
Hussain v. Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2022 FC 1412
...Borbon Marte v Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2010 FC 930 at para 40; Ikeji v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 1422 at para 50, and; Garces Canga v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 749 at para 28). [20] The Applicant filed his PRRA Application i......
-
Iwekaeze v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 814
...it is up to them to put their “best foot forward” to meet this onus: Ferguson at para 22; Ikeji v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 1422 at para 47; Nhegu v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 913 at para 6. It is reasonable for an officer reviewing a PRRA application ......
-
Jystina v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 912
...to establish their claim, and to put their “best foot forward” (Jama at para 23; see also Ikeji v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 1422 at para 47). [15] The present circumstances do not warrant a departure from this rule. Accordingly, to the extent that statements in the Appli......
Request a trial to view additional results