Infante v. Dzogov et al., 2016 ABQB 41

JudgeKenny, J.
Citation2016 ABQB 41
CourtCourt of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
Subject MatterLIMITATION OF ACTIONS,PRACTICE
Date20 January 2016
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
3 practice notes
  • Bahadar v Real Estate Council of Alberta,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • May 19, 2021
    ...of the law, a palpable and overriding error of fact, or some other appropriate reason to vary the decision: Infante v Dzogov, 2016 ABQB 41 at para [13]        This issue has received considerable judicial attention and the confusion appears to stem from co......
  • Remington Development Corporation v Enmax Power Corporation,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • May 31, 2021
    ...unless there is a clear error in law, a palpable or overriding error of fact or another appropriate reason, citing Infante v Dzogov, 2016 ABQB 41 at para 19. With the greatest of respect to my sister, her recitation of that standard of review itself cited a number of cases which preceded th......
  • Brookfield Residential (Alberta) LP (Carma Developers LP) v Imperial Oil Limited,, 2017 ABQB 218
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • March 28, 2017
    ...Owners: Condominium Plan No 0125764 v Amber Equities Inc, 2015 ABQB 235; R Floden Services Ltd v Solomon, 2015 ABQB 450; Infante v Dzogov, 2016 ABQB 41; 66292 Manitoba Ltd v Imperial Oil Limited, 2002 MBQB 145; Berendsen v Ontario 2009 ONCA 845 at para 25, rev’g on other grounds, 2008 CanLI......
3 cases
  • Bahadar v Real Estate Council of Alberta,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • May 19, 2021
    ...of the law, a palpable and overriding error of fact, or some other appropriate reason to vary the decision: Infante v Dzogov, 2016 ABQB 41 at para [13]        This issue has received considerable judicial attention and the confusion appears to stem from co......
  • Remington Development Corporation v Enmax Power Corporation,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • May 31, 2021
    ...unless there is a clear error in law, a palpable or overriding error of fact or another appropriate reason, citing Infante v Dzogov, 2016 ABQB 41 at para 19. With the greatest of respect to my sister, her recitation of that standard of review itself cited a number of cases which preceded th......
  • Brookfield Residential (Alberta) LP (Carma Developers LP) v Imperial Oil Limited,, 2017 ABQB 218
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • March 28, 2017
    ...Owners: Condominium Plan No 0125764 v Amber Equities Inc, 2015 ABQB 235; R Floden Services Ltd v Solomon, 2015 ABQB 450; Infante v Dzogov, 2016 ABQB 41; 66292 Manitoba Ltd v Imperial Oil Limited, 2002 MBQB 145; Berendsen v Ontario 2009 ONCA 845 at para 25, rev’g on other grounds, 2008 CanLI......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT