J.C.M. v. M.J.M., 2018 NBCA 42

JudgeThe Honourable Justice Larlee; The Honourable Justice Quigg; The Honourable Justice Baird
CourtCourt of Appeal (New Brunswick)
Case DateJuly 19, 2018
JurisdictionNew Brunswick
Citations2018 NBCA 42
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
17 practice notes
  • Split and Shared Parenting Time Arrangements
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Child Support Guidelines in Canada, 2022
    • July 27, 2022
    ...65–69; see also CAS v ABS, 2019 BCSC 948; Cherewyk v Cherewyk, 2018 MBCA 13, citing Kolisnyk v Loscerbo, 2010 MBCA 1. And see JCM v MJM, 2018 NBCA 42, citing Professor Rollie Thompson, “Case Comment: Contino v Leonelli-Contino” (2004), 42 RFL (5th) 326; see also MacDonald v Brodoff, 2020 AB......
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Child Support Guidelines in Canada, 2022
    • July 27, 2022
    ...JCM v MJM, 2018 NBCA 42.......................................................................................................................225, 289, 335 JCR v JJR, 2006 BCSC 1422....................................................................................................................
  • Determination of Income; Disclosure of Income
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Child Support Guidelines in Canada, 2022
    • July 27, 2022
    ...JT v TK, 2018 NSSC 42 at para 29, Beaton J. 761 2010 ABCA 187. 762 2007 BCCA 604; see also Johnson v Johnson, 2011 BCCA 190; JCM v MJM, 2018 NBCA 42. 226 Child Support Guidelines in Canada, Support Guidelines, but allowed the husband’s appeal insofar as an additional $42,000 was imputed to ......
  • Child Support on or After Divorce
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Canadian Family Law - Ninth edition
    • July 25, 2022
    ...(SC); Cervi v McDonald, 2021 ONSC 1843. 147 Johnson v Johnson, [1998] BCJ No 1080 (SC); Cervi v McDonald, 2021 ONSC 1843. 148 JCM v MJM, 2018 NBCA 42; Magnes v Magnes, [1997] SJ No 407 (QB). Compare Koback v Koback, 2013 SKCA 91 at paras 149 Matwichuk v Stephenson, [2007] BCJ No 2347 (SC); ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
7 cases
  • S.A.H. v. K.A.H.,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (New Brunswick)
    • January 1, 2022
    ...In J.C.M. v. M.J.M., 2018 NBCA 42, [2018] N.B.J. No. 158 (QL), the Court In my opinion, this ground of appeal has merit. Section 9 is a vexing section for both lawyers and courts alike. In 2005, the Supreme Court attempted to answer some of the questions concerning its applicability. In Con......
  • R.J. v. P.J.,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (New Brunswick)
    • May 27, 2021
    ...however, this is what the Supreme Court instructed. See G.F. v. J.A.C.F., 2016 NBCA 21, 449 N.B.R. (2d) 34, at para. 14; J.C.M. v. M.J.M., 2018 NBCA 42, [2018] N.B.J. No. 158 (QL), at para. 43; A.S.L. v. L.S.L., 2020 NBCA 15, [2020] N.B.J. No. 63 (QL). Before us, the parents agreed there wa......
  • MacDonald v Brodoff, 2020 ABCA 246
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • June 22, 2020
    ...the consideration of each parties’ income through a consideration of s 9(c) factors: Klassen v Morrow, 2002 ABCA 172 at para 7; JCM v MJM, 2018 NBCA 42 at para 39 [43] Part of the confusion arises from a misunderstanding of the Supreme Court of Canada’s use of the terms “Guidelines amounts”......
  • K. A. H. v. S. A. H.,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of New Brunswick (Canada)
    • May 6, 2021
    ...15 the New Brunswick Court of Appeal considered the process to ensure a proper s.9 analysis: 13 This is confirmed in J.C.M. v. M.J.M., 2018 NBCA 42, [2018] N.B.J. No. 158 (N.B. C.A.) : [...] Section 9 is a vexing section for both lawyers and courts alike. In 2005, the Supreme Court attempte......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
10 books & journal articles
  • Shared parenting arrangements
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Child Support Guidelines in Canada, 2020
    • June 23, 2019
    ...65–69; see also CAS v ABS, 2019 BCSC 948; Cherewyk v Cherewyk, 2018 MBCA 13, citing Kolisnyk v Loscerbo , 2010 MBCA 1. And see JCM v MJM, 2018 NBCA 42, citing Professor Rollie hompson, “Case Comment: Contino v Leonelli-Contino” (2004), 42 RFL (5th) 326. As to the application of section 9 of......
  • Split and Shared Parenting Time Arrangements
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Child Support Guidelines in Canada, 2022
    • July 27, 2022
    ...65–69; see also CAS v ABS, 2019 BCSC 948; Cherewyk v Cherewyk, 2018 MBCA 13, citing Kolisnyk v Loscerbo, 2010 MBCA 1. And see JCM v MJM, 2018 NBCA 42, citing Professor Rollie Thompson, “Case Comment: Contino v Leonelli-Contino” (2004), 42 RFL (5th) 326; see also MacDonald v Brodoff, 2020 AB......
  • Special or extraordinary expenses
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Child Support Guidelines in Canada, 2020
    • June 23, 2019
    ...Canada v Canada-Somers, 2008 MBCA 59 (tuition tax credit); FM v TH, 2016 NBCA 29 at para 36; TMD v JPG, 2018 NBCA 15; JCM v MJM, 2018 NBCA 42; Walsh v Walsh, [2006] NJ No 33 (UFC) (parties free to provide s 7(3) information to secure adjustment of court-ordered apportionment of s 7 expenses......
  • Child Support on or after Divorce
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Canadian Family Law. Eighth Edition
    • August 3, 2020
    ...[1998] BCJ No 55 (SC). 136 St Amour v St Amour, [1997] NSJ No 363 (SC). 137 Johnson v Johnson, [1998] BCJ No 1080 (SC). 138 JCM v MJM, 2018 NBCA 42; Magnes v Magnes, [1997] SJ No 407 (QB). Compare Koback v Koback, 2013 SKCA 91 at paras 139 Matwichuk v Stephenson, [2007] BCJ No 2347 (SC); Re......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT