Jalan v. Institute of Indigenous Government et al.,
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Judge | Kelleher, J. |
| Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
| Citation | 2005 BCSC 590,[2005] B.C.T.C. 590 (SC) |
| Date | 26 April 2005 |
Jalan v. Institute of Indigenous Govt., [2005] B.C.T.C. 590 (SC)
MLB headnote and full text
Temp. Cite: [2005] B.C.T.C. TBEd. MY.038
Dr. Rahael Koshy Jalan (plaintiff) v. Institute of Indigenous Government (defendant) and Georges E. Sioui (third party)
(S034241; 2005 BCSC 590)
Indexed As: Jalan v. Institute of Indigenous Government et al.
British Columbia Supreme Court
Vancouver
Kelleher, J.
April 26, 2005.
Summary:
This headnote contains no summary.
Master and Servant - Topic 7608
Dismissal or discipline of employees - Defences - Waiver, condonation or warning of misconduct - See paragraphs 73 to 78.
Master and Servant - Topic 8000
Dismissal without cause - Notice of dismissal - What constitutes reasonable notice - See paragraphs 86 to 103.
Master and Servant - Topic 8001
Dismissal without cause - Notice of dismissal - Reasonable notice - Effect of statutory requirements - See paragraphs 79 to 85.
Master and Servant - Topic 8003
Dismissal without cause - Notice of dismissal - Reasonable notice - Considerations affecting (incl. bad faith) - See paragraphs 104 to 130.
Master and Servant - Topic 8064
Dismissal without cause - Damages - Mitigation - See paragraphs 163 to 170.
Cases Noticed:
McIntyre v. Hockin (1889), 16 O.A.R. 498 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 73].
Hawley v. GMD Resource Corp. (2002), 16 C.C.E.L.(3d) 248 (B.C.S.C.), refd to. [para. 74].
Hoff v. Lampliter Lighting Corp. (1978), 93 D.L.R.(3d) 634 (B.C.S.C.), refd to. [para. 74].
Suleman v. British Columbia Research Council (1990), 52 B.C.L.R.(2d) 138 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 75].
Kalaman v. Singer Valve Co. et al. (1997), 93 B.C.A.C. 93; 151 W.A.C. 93; 38 B.C.L.R.(3d) 331 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 75].
Restauronics Services Ltd. et al. v. Forster et al. (2004), 195 B.C.A.C. 105; 319 W.A.C. 105; 23 B.C.L.R.(4th) 281 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 75].
Ennis v. Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (1986), 13 C.C.E.L. 25 (B.C.S.C.), refd to. [para. 76].
Blomgren v. Jingle Pot Pub Ltd. (1999), 118 B.C.A.C. 231; 192 W.A.C. 231; 61 B.C.L.R.(3d) 186 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 77].
Wallace v. United Grain Growers Ltd., [1997] 3 S.C.R. 701; 219 N.R. 161; 123 Man.R.(2d) 1; 159 W.A.C. 1, refd to. [para. 80].
Clendenning v. Lowndes Lambert (B.C.) Ltd. (2000), 145 B.C.A.C. 188; 237 W.A.C. 188; 82 B.C.L.R.(3d) 239 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 83].
Bardal v. Globe & Mail Ltd. (1960), 24 D.L.R.(2d) 140 (Ont. H.C.), refd to. [para. 86].
Noël v. Société d'énergie de la Baie James, [2001] 2 S.C.R. 207; 271 N.R. 304, refd to. [para. 89].
7-Eleven Canada Inc., Re, [2002] B.C.L.R.B.D. No. 91, refd to. [para. 89].
Foreman v. 818329 Ontario Ltd. et al. (2003), 175 O.A.C. 234; 229 D.L.R.(4th) 385 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 90].
Singh v. British Columbia Hydro and Power Authority (2001), 161 B.C.A.C. 53; 263 W.A.C. 53; 95 B.C.L.R.(3d) 238 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 90].
Jung v. Lheidli T'enneh Indian Band, [2000] B.C.T.C. 229; 50 C.C.E.L.(2d) 31 (S.C.), refd to. [para. 92].
McKinney v. University of Guelph et al., [1990] 3 S.C.R. 229; 118 N.R. 1; 45 O.A.C. 1, refd to. [para. 93].
Brause v. Microtel Ltd. (1989), 27 C.C.E.L. 260 (B.C.S.C.), refd to. [para. 98].
Greenwood v. Chilliwack Christian School Society, [1994] B.C.T.C. Uned. H24; 8 C.C.E.L.(2d) 122 (S.C.), refd to. [para. 99].
Ansari v. British Columbia Hydro and Power Authority (1986), 2 B.C.L.R.(2d) 33 (S.C.), refd to. [para. 102].
Schewe v. Okanagan University College, [2001] B.C.T.C. 343; 2001 BCSC 343, refd to. [para. 102].
Battye v. Cumberland Community College Board (1986), 48 Sask.R. 120 (Q.B.), refd to. [para. 102].
Lalonde v. Kelowna (City) (1981), 29 B.C.L.R. 125 (S.C.), refd to. [para. 118].
Martell v. Ewos Canada Ltd. et al., [2005] B.C.T.C. 43; 2005 BCSC 43, refd to. [para. 123].
Litster v. British Columbia Ferry Corp. et al., [2003] B.C.T.C. 557; 24 C.C.E.L.(3d) 95 (S.C.), refd to. [para. 124].
Linsdell v. Squamish WK Enterprises Inc., [2003] B.C.T.C. 188; 2003 BCSC 188, refd to. [para. 124].
Vorvis v. Insurance Corp. of British Columbia, [1989] 1 S.C.R. 1085; 94 N.R. 321, refd to. [para. 131].
McKinley v. BC Tel et al., [2001] 2 S.C.R. 161; 271 N.R. 16; 153 B.C.A.C. 161; 251 W.A.C. 161, refd to. [para. 135].
Lister v. Romford Ice and Cold Storage Co., [1957] A.C. 555 (H.L.), refd to. [para. 140].
Texada Towing Co. v. Minette (1969), 9 D.L.R.(3d) 286 (B.C.S.C.), refd to. [para. 140].
Overmyer (D.H.) Co. of Canada v. Wallace Transfer Ltd. (1975), 65 D.L.R.(3d) 717 (B.C.C.A.), refd to. [para. 140].
Fenn v. Peterborough (City) (1979), 104 D.L.R.(3d) 174 (Ont. C.A.), affd. [1981] 2 S.C.R. 613; 40 N.R. 425, refd to. [para. 145].
McCrindle v. Westin Ltd. (1985), 35 C.C.L.T. 183 (Ont. H.C.), refd to. [para. 147].
London Drugs Ltd. v. Brassart and Vanwinkel, [1992] 3 S.C.R. 299; 143 N.R. 1; 18 B.C.A.C. 1; 31 W.A.C. 1, refd to. [para. 148].
London Drugs v. Kuehne & Nagle International Ltd. et al. - see London Drugs Ltd. v. Brassart and Vanwinkel.
Brazeau v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, [2004] B.C.T.C. 251; 2004 BCSC 251, refd to. [para. 163].
Statutes Noticed:
Employment Termination Standards Regulation - see Public Sector Employers Act Regulations (B.C.).
Public Sector Employers Act Regulations (B.C.), Employment Termination Standards Regulation, Reg. 379/97, sect. 5(1)(b), sect. 5(2) [para. 79].
Counsel:
Allan E. Black, Q.C., and Neil J. Hain, for the plaintiff;
Geoffrey J. Litherland and Paul D. McLean, for the defendant;
H. David Edinger and Derek Johnson, for the third party.
This case was heard on December 6-10 and 13-16, 2004 and January 24-27 and February 16-18, 2005, before Kelleher, J., of the British Columbia Supreme Court, who delivered the following decision on April 26, 2005.
Please note: The following judgment has not been edited.
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
-
Table of Cases
...2 S.C.R. 570, 174 D.L.R. (4th) 71, [1999] S.C.J. No. 36 ..... 92 Jalan v. Institute of Indigenous Government, [2005] B.C.J. No. 929, 2005 BCSC 590 .................................................................................................... 133 Jalbert v. Moore (1996), 28 C.H.R.R. D/......
-
Cunningham v. Hillview Homes Ltd., (2015) 615 A.R. 375 (QB)
...241; 106 O.A.C. 1; 154 D.L.R.(4th) 193, refd to. [para. 50]. Jalan v. Institute of Indigenous Government et al., [2005] B.C.T.C. 590; 2005 BCSC 590, refd to. [para. 63]. Thompson Brothers (Construction) Ltd. v. Saar, 2012 CarswellAlta 2359 (Prov. Ct.), refd to. [para. 65]. Boyd v. Culliton ......
-
Albert v. Conseil scolaire francophone de la Colombie-Britannique,
...[1985] 2 S.C.R. 643; 63 N.R. 353, refd to. [para. 48]. Jalan v. Institute of Indigenous Government et al., [2005] B.C.T.C. 590; 2005 BCSC 590, refd to. [para. New Brunswick (Board of Management) v. Dunsmuir (2008), 372 N.R. 1; 329 N.B.R.(2d) 1; 844 A.P.R. 1; 2008 SCC 9, refd to. [para. 49].......
-
Munoz v. Sierra Systems Group Inc.,
...British Columbia Hazardous Waste Management Corp . (1995), 8 C.C.E.L. (2d) 262 (B.C.S.C.); and Jalan v. Inst. of Indigenous Government , 2005 BCSC 590. [59] The defendant argues that the claim for negligent misrepresentation fails because there was only vague evidence as to the nature of th......
-
Cunningham v. Hillview Homes Ltd., (2015) 615 A.R. 375 (QB)
...241; 106 O.A.C. 1; 154 D.L.R.(4th) 193, refd to. [para. 50]. Jalan v. Institute of Indigenous Government et al., [2005] B.C.T.C. 590; 2005 BCSC 590, refd to. [para. 63]. Thompson Brothers (Construction) Ltd. v. Saar, 2012 CarswellAlta 2359 (Prov. Ct.), refd to. [para. 65]. Boyd v. Culliton ......
-
Albert v. Conseil scolaire francophone de la Colombie-Britannique
...[1985] 2 S.C.R. 643; 63 N.R. 353, refd to. [para. 48]. Jalan v. Institute of Indigenous Government et al., [2005] B.C.T.C. 590; 2005 BCSC 590, refd to. [para. New Brunswick (Board of Management) v. Dunsmuir (2008), 372 N.R. 1; 329 N.B.R.(2d) 1; 844 A.P.R. 1; 2008 SCC 9, refd to. [para. 49].......
-
Munoz v. Sierra Systems Group Inc.
...British Columbia Hazardous Waste Management Corp . (1995), 8 C.C.E.L. (2d) 262 (B.C.S.C.); and Jalan v. Inst. of Indigenous Government , 2005 BCSC 590. [59] The defendant argues that the claim for negligent misrepresentation fails because there was only vague evidence as to the nature of th......
-
Poirier v. Wal-Mart Canada Corp.
...Condonation may take various forms, such as a failure to address alleged misconduct. In Jalan v. Institute of Indigenous Government , 2005 BCSC 590 at ¶78, the employer's failure to investigate the alleged misconduct was found to constitute condonation, and the employer was accordingly unab......
-
Table of Cases
...2 S.C.R. 570, 174 D.L.R. (4th) 71, [1999] S.C.J. No. 36 ..... 92 Jalan v. Institute of Indigenous Government, [2005] B.C.J. No. 929, 2005 BCSC 590 .................................................................................................... 133 Jalbert v. Moore (1996), 28 C.H.R.R. D/......
-
Clarity and confusion in employment law remedies: a comment on Honda Canada Inc. v. Keays.
...such compensation to the employment context. (45) Fidler, supra note 24. (46) See e.g. Jalan v. Institute of Indigenous Government, 2005 BCSC 590, 138 A.C.W.S. (3d) 1089 at para. (47) See e.g. Barnard v. Testori Americas Corp., 2001 PESCAD 4, 107 A.C.W.S. (3d) 619; Lane v. Nanaimo-Ladysmith......