Jama v. Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2019 FC 1459
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
| Citation | 2019 FC 1459 |
| Date | 19 November 2019 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
9 practice notes
-
Adu v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 1363
...considered all the evidence on the record: Ruszo v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 943 at para 34 ; Jama v Canada (PSEP), 2019 FC 1459 at para 17. However, when the evidence goes to the heart of the decision-maker’s concerns, it becomes important to explicitly address i......
-
Jystina v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 912
...few exceptions: Delios v Canada (Attorney General), 2015 FCA 117 at para 42; Jama v Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2019 FC 1459 at para 23 [Jama]; Storozhuk v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2017 FC 74 at para 13. This is consistent with a PRRA applicant’s burden t......
-
Donarus v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2021 FC 1457
...(QL); Jorfi v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2014 FC 365 at para 31; and Jama v Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2019 FC 1459 at para 17. It is “only when an administrative decision maker is silent on evidence clearly pointing to an opposite conclusion that t......
-
Yan v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2024 FC 448
...para 20; Singh v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 616 at para 21; Jama v Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2019 FC 1459 at para [19] In support of his argument that the Officer overlooked relevant documentary evidence in favour of outdated evidence, the Applica......
Request a trial to view additional results
8 cases
-
Adu v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 1363
...considered all the evidence on the record: Ruszo v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 943 at para 34 ; Jama v Canada (PSEP), 2019 FC 1459 at para 17. However, when the evidence goes to the heart of the decision-maker’s concerns, it becomes important to explicitly address i......
-
Jystina v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 912
...few exceptions: Delios v Canada (Attorney General), 2015 FCA 117 at para 42; Jama v Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2019 FC 1459 at para 23 [Jama]; Storozhuk v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2017 FC 74 at para 13. This is consistent with a PRRA applicant’s burden t......
-
Donarus v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2021 FC 1457
...(QL); Jorfi v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2014 FC 365 at para 31; and Jama v Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2019 FC 1459 at para 17. It is “only when an administrative decision maker is silent on evidence clearly pointing to an opposite conclusion that t......
-
Wang v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 546
...to address the evidence in order for a decision to be considered reasonable (Jama v Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2019 FC 1459 at para 17). It is my view that the RAD conducted a selective review of the evidence by failing to consider contradictory evidence, leading to ......
Request a trial to view additional results