JANS v. JANS, 2016 SKQB 275
Jurisdiction | Saskatchewan |
Judge | BARRINGTON-FOOTE J. |
Docket Number | QBG 43 of 2011 |
Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada) |
Date | 24 August 2016 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
15 practice notes
-
Agreements in Writing
...709; Mountain v TD Canada Trust Co , 2012 ONCA 806, 112 OR (3d) 721; Haan v Haan , 2015 ABCA 395, 30 Alta LR (6th) 21; Jans v Jans Estate 2016 SKQB 275. 102 Some provincial courts have approved the Steadman version of the test. See, for example, MacNeil v McLeod-Norris , 2004 NWTSC 81. And ......
-
Carruthers v. Carruthers and Whiteshore Land & Cattle, 2019 SKQB 7
...yet quantified, claim against the parents at the date of application: Kerr v Baranow, 2011 SCC 10, [2011] 1 SCR 269; Jans v Jans Estate, 2016 SKQB 275, 21 ETR (4th) 35; Franke v Munro, 2013 SKQB 234, [2013] 11 WWR 117; and Buchko v Buchko (1997), 156 Sask R 100 (QB). Choses in action have b......
-
Digest: ADAG Corp. Canada Ltd. v SaskEnergy Inc., 2018 SKCA 14
...SCC 33, [2002] 2 SCR 235, 286 NR 1, 211 DLR (4th) 577, [2002] 7 WWR 1, 219 Sask R 1, 10 CCLT (3d) 157, 30 MPLR (3d) 1 Jans v Jans Estate, 2016 SKQB 275, 271 ACWS (3d) 82 J.J. Coughlan Ltd. v Ruparelia, [2003] EWCA Civ 1057, [2004] PNLR 4 Kansas RSA 15 Limited Partnership v SBMS RSA, Inc., C......
-
Anderson v Anderson,
...rigidly so that the intentions of the parties to create a binding agreement are thwarted. (Emphasis added) See also Jans v Jans Estate, 2016 SKQB 275 at paras 184–194, 21 ETR (4th) 35, rev’d in part, 2020 SKCA 61 (but not on this point), and Gichuru v Ash Estate, 2010 BCS......
Request a trial to view additional results
13 cases
-
Carruthers v. Carruthers and Whiteshore Land & Cattle, 2019 SKQB 7
...yet quantified, claim against the parents at the date of application: Kerr v Baranow, 2011 SCC 10, [2011] 1 SCR 269; Jans v Jans Estate, 2016 SKQB 275, 21 ETR (4th) 35; Franke v Munro, 2013 SKQB 234, [2013] 11 WWR 117; and Buchko v Buchko (1997), 156 Sask R 100 (QB). Choses in action have b......
-
Anderson v Anderson,
...rigidly so that the intentions of the parties to create a binding agreement are thwarted. (Emphasis added) See also Jans v Jans Estate, 2016 SKQB 275 at paras 184–194, 21 ETR (4th) 35, rev’d in part, 2020 SKCA 61 (but not on this point), and Gichuru v Ash Estate, 2010 BCS......
-
Burnouf v Burnouf,
...verbal gift to “a verbal agreement for the sale of land” (at para 20). Buchko has been followed in Jans v Jans Estate, 2016 SKQB 275, 21 ETR (4th) 35, rev’d in part 2020 SKCA 61, 59 ETR (4th) 53 (but not on this point), and Carruthers v Carruthers, 2019 SKQB 7 at p......
-
GEORGE v. PENNER, 2020 SKQB 99
...assessed on Column 1 of the tariff. This case is nothing like Choubal, (where second counsel costs were allowed) or Jans v Jans Estate, 2016 SKQB 275, where a lengthy and complex trial led Justice Barrington-Foote (as he then was) to make a cost award for second counsel. Similarly in Hill v......
Request a trial to view additional results
4 books & journal articles
-
Specific Performance: Discretionary Defences and Considerations that Affect Discretion
...(2d) 104 (HCJ), af’d (1979), 27 OR (2d) 256 (CA); Christy v Mohl , [1985] BCJ No 1623 (SC). 72 See, for example, Jans v Jans (Estate) , 2016 SKQB 275, af’d on these issues 2020 SKCA 61. 73 Haan v Haan , 2015 ABCA 395 at para 15 [citations omitted]. 74 B & R Development Corp v Trail South De......
-
Table of cases
...99 Jane Doe 72511 v NM, 2018 ONSC 6607 ........................................................... 109 Jans v Jans (Estate), 2016 SKQB 275, af’d 2020 SKCA 61.................................. 456 Janssen Inc v Abbvie Corp, 2014 FCA 112 .............................................................
-
Agreements in Writing
...709; Mountain v TD Canada Trust Co , 2012 ONCA 806, 112 OR (3d) 721; Haan v Haan , 2015 ABCA 395, 30 Alta LR (6th) 21; Jans v Jans Estate 2016 SKQB 275. 102 Some provincial courts have approved the Steadman version of the test. See, for example, MacNeil v McLeod-Norris , 2004 NWTSC 81. And ......
-
Digest: ADAG Corp. Canada Ltd. v SaskEnergy Inc., 2018 SKCA 14
...SCC 33, [2002] 2 SCR 235, 286 NR 1, 211 DLR (4th) 577, [2002] 7 WWR 1, 219 Sask R 1, 10 CCLT (3d) 157, 30 MPLR (3d) 1 Jans v Jans Estate, 2016 SKQB 275, 271 ACWS (3d) 82 J.J. Coughlan Ltd. v Ruparelia, [2003] EWCA Civ 1057, [2004] PNLR 4 Kansas RSA 15 Limited Partnership v SBMS RSA, Inc., C......