Jer et al. v. Samji et al., [2013] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1671 (SC)

JudgeGerow, J.
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
Case DateSeptember 10, 2013
JurisdictionBritish Columbia
Citations[2013] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1671 (SC);2013 BCSC 1671;[2013] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1671
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
18 practice notes
  • Introduction
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Canadian Class Action Review No. 12-1, December 2016
    • December 1, 2016
    ...43 Condon, ibid at para 14. 44 Kohler v Apotex, 2015 ABQB 610. 45 See Jer et al v Samji et al, SCBC No S-121627 (Vancouver), certified at 2013 BCSC 1671, aff’d 2014 BCCA 116; as well as Samji (Re), 2013 BCSC 2101; Peters v Samji, 2013 BCSC 2290; In the Matter of s. 152 of the Securities Act......
  • Intervenors and Class Proceedings - Not Welcome at the Party?
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Canadian Class Action Review No. 12-1, December 2016
    • December 1, 2016
    ...43 Condon, ibid at para 14. 44 Kohler v Apotex, 2015 ABQB 610. 45 See Jer et al v Samji et al, SCBC No S-121627 (Vancouver), certified at 2013 BCSC 1671, aff’d 2014 BCCA 116; as well as Samji (Re), 2013 BCSC 2101; Peters v Samji, 2013 BCSC 2290; In the Matter of s. 152 of the Securities Act......
  • Successful Tobacco Litigation in Quebec: Why Hold Cigarettes to a Higher Standard Than Pharmaceutical Products?
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Canadian Class Action Review No. 12-1, December 2016
    • December 1, 2016
    ...43 Condon, ibid at para 14. 44 Kohler v Apotex, 2015 ABQB 610. 45 See Jer et al v Samji et al, SCBC No S-121627 (Vancouver), certified at 2013 BCSC 1671, aff’d 2014 BCCA 116; as well as Samji (Re), 2013 BCSC 2101; Peters v Samji, 2013 BCSC 2290; In the Matter of s. 152 of the Securities Act......
  • Secondary Market Liability in Ontario: Interpreting the Leave Test Before and After Theratechnologies
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Canadian Class Action Review No. 12-1, December 2016
    • December 1, 2016
    ...43 Condon, ibid at para 14. 44 Kohler v Apotex, 2015 ABQB 610. 45 See Jer et al v Samji et al, SCBC No S-121627 (Vancouver), certified at 2013 BCSC 1671, aff’d 2014 BCCA 116; as well as Samji (Re), 2013 BCSC 2101; Peters v Samji, 2013 BCSC 2290; In the Matter of s. 152 of the Securities Act......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
5 cases
  • Jer et al. v. Samji et al., (2014) 353 B.C.A.C. 131 (CA)
    • Canada
    • British Columbia Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • January 27, 2014
    ...All arise from an order of Madam Justice Gerow certifying a class action, pronounced on September 10, 2013, made for reasons indexed at 2013 BCSC 1671. [2] Vancouver City Savings Credit Union (the appellant in CA041268, "Vancity"), Worldsource Financial Management Inc. (the appellant in CA0......
  • Felker v. Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • October 17, 2022
    ...not the preferable procedure, they must provide a realistic alternative proposal, supported with an evidentiary foundation: Jer v. Samji, 2013 BCSC 1671 at para. 208, rev’d in part but not on this issue, 2014 BCCA 116. They submit that it would be antithetical to permit the defendant......
  • Jastram Properties Ltd. v. HSBC Bank Canada,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • November 12, 2021
    ...84-85, aff’d 2010 ONCA 514 at paras. 2, 9; Kherani v. Bank of Montreal, 2012 ONSC 2230 at paras. 145-147; Jer v. Samji, 2013 BCSC 1671 at paras. 90-102 [Jer], varied on other grounds 2014 BCCA 116 at para. 35; Grossman v. Toronto-Dominion Bank, 2014 ONSC 3578 at p......
  • Manning v. Dhalla, 2018 BCSC 2148
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • December 5, 2018
    ...also class members in a class proceeding ongoing against Ms. Samji, the Society of Notaries, and various banks: see Jer v. Royal Bank, 2013 BCSC 1671, rev’d in part 2014 BCCA 116 (the “Class Action”). The plaintiffs have recovered additional sums through settlements achieved in the Class ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
13 books & journal articles
  • Introduction
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Canadian Class Action Review No. 12-1, December 2016
    • December 1, 2016
    ...43 Condon, ibid at para 14. 44 Kohler v Apotex, 2015 ABQB 610. 45 See Jer et al v Samji et al, SCBC No S-121627 (Vancouver), certified at 2013 BCSC 1671, aff’d 2014 BCCA 116; as well as Samji (Re), 2013 BCSC 2101; Peters v Samji, 2013 BCSC 2290; In the Matter of s. 152 of the Securities Act......
  • Intervenors and Class Proceedings - Not Welcome at the Party?
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Canadian Class Action Review No. 12-1, December 2016
    • December 1, 2016
    ...43 Condon, ibid at para 14. 44 Kohler v Apotex, 2015 ABQB 610. 45 See Jer et al v Samji et al, SCBC No S-121627 (Vancouver), certified at 2013 BCSC 1671, aff’d 2014 BCCA 116; as well as Samji (Re), 2013 BCSC 2101; Peters v Samji, 2013 BCSC 2290; In the Matter of s. 152 of the Securities Act......
  • Successful Tobacco Litigation in Quebec: Why Hold Cigarettes to a Higher Standard Than Pharmaceutical Products?
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Canadian Class Action Review No. 12-1, December 2016
    • December 1, 2016
    ...43 Condon, ibid at para 14. 44 Kohler v Apotex, 2015 ABQB 610. 45 See Jer et al v Samji et al, SCBC No S-121627 (Vancouver), certified at 2013 BCSC 1671, aff’d 2014 BCCA 116; as well as Samji (Re), 2013 BCSC 2101; Peters v Samji, 2013 BCSC 2290; In the Matter of s. 152 of the Securities Act......
  • Secondary Market Liability in Ontario: Interpreting the Leave Test Before and After Theratechnologies
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Canadian Class Action Review No. 12-1, December 2016
    • December 1, 2016
    ...43 Condon, ibid at para 14. 44 Kohler v Apotex, 2015 ABQB 610. 45 See Jer et al v Samji et al, SCBC No S-121627 (Vancouver), certified at 2013 BCSC 1671, aff’d 2014 BCCA 116; as well as Samji (Re), 2013 BCSC 2101; Peters v Samji, 2013 BCSC 2290; In the Matter of s. 152 of the Securities Act......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT