Jer et al. v. Samji et al.,
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Judge | Gerow, J. |
| Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
| Citation | [2013] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1671 (SC),2013 BCSC 1671,[2013] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1671 |
| Date | 10 September 2013 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
20 practice notes
-
Intervenors and Class Proceedings - Not Welcome at the Party?
...43 Condon, ibid at para 14. 44 Kohler v Apotex, 2015 ABQB 610. 45 See Jer et al v Samji et al, SCBC No S-121627 (Vancouver), certified at 2013 BCSC 1671, aff’d 2014 BCCA 116; as well as Samji (Re), 2013 BCSC 2101; Peters v Samji, 2013 BCSC 2290; In the Matter of s. 152 of the Securities Act......
-
Secondary Market Liability in Ontario: Interpreting the Leave Test Before and After Theratechnologies
...43 Condon, ibid at para 14. 44 Kohler v Apotex, 2015 ABQB 610. 45 See Jer et al v Samji et al, SCBC No S-121627 (Vancouver), certified at 2013 BCSC 1671, aff’d 2014 BCCA 116; as well as Samji (Re), 2013 BCSC 2101; Peters v Samji, 2013 BCSC 2290; In the Matter of s. 152 of the Securities Act......
-
Expert Evidence in Class Actions Litigation: A Proposed Framework for a Reliability Analysis
...43 Condon, ibid at para 14. 44 Kohler v Apotex, 2015 ABQB 610. 45 See Jer et al v Samji et al, SCBC No S-121627 (Vancouver), certified at 2013 BCSC 1671, aff’d 2014 BCCA 116; as well as Samji (Re), 2013 BCSC 2101; Peters v Samji, 2013 BCSC 2290; In the Matter of s. 152 of the Securities Act......
-
Successful Tobacco Litigation in Quebec: Why Hold Cigarettes to a Higher Standard Than Pharmaceutical Products?
...43 Condon, ibid at para 14. 44 Kohler v Apotex, 2015 ABQB 610. 45 See Jer et al v Samji et al, SCBC No S-121627 (Vancouver), certified at 2013 BCSC 1671, aff’d 2014 BCCA 116; as well as Samji (Re), 2013 BCSC 2101; Peters v Samji, 2013 BCSC 2290; In the Matter of s. 152 of the Securities Act......
Get Started for Free
7 cases
-
Felker v. Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R,
...not the preferable procedure, they must provide a realistic alternative proposal, supported with an evidentiary foundation: Jer v. Samji, 2013 BCSC 1671 at para. 208, rev’d in part but not on this issue, 2014 BCCA 116. They submit that it would be antithetical to permit the defendant......
-
Jer et al. v. Samji et al.,
...All arise from an order of Madam Justice Gerow certifying a class action, pronounced on September 10, 2013, made for reasons indexed at 2013 BCSC 1671. [2] Vancouver City Savings Credit Union (the appellant in CA041268, "Vancity"), Worldsource Financial Management Inc. (the appellant in CA0......
-
Jastram Properties Ltd. v. HSBC Bank Canada,
...84-85, aff’d 2010 ONCA 514 at paras. 2, 9; Kherani v. Bank of Montreal, 2012 ONSC 2230 at paras. 145-147; Jer v. Samji, 2013 BCSC 1671 at paras. 90-102 [Jer], varied on other grounds 2014 BCCA 116 at para. 35; Grossman v. Toronto-Dominion Bank, 2014 ONSC 3578 at p......
-
2024 BCSC 1931,
...it with evidence. They deny an assertion that the mere existence of alternate procedures means they are to be preferred: Jer v. Samji, 2013 BCSC 1671 at para. 208; aff'd Jer v. Royal Bank of Canada, 2014 BCCA 240 The plaintiffs argue that, if certification is denied, the likely outcome woul......
Get Started for Free
13 books & journal articles
-
Introduction
...43 Condon, ibid at para 14. 44 Kohler v Apotex, 2015 ABQB 610. 45 See Jer et al v Samji et al, SCBC No S-121627 (Vancouver), certified at 2013 BCSC 1671, aff’d 2014 BCCA 116; as well as Samji (Re), 2013 BCSC 2101; Peters v Samji, 2013 BCSC 2290; In the Matter of s. 152 of the Securities Act......
-
Class Actions as a Bridge Between Cultures of Dignity and Victimhood
...43 Condon, ibid at para 14. 44 Kohler v Apotex, 2015 ABQB 610. 45 See Jer et al v Samji et al, SCBC No S-121627 (Vancouver), certified at 2013 BCSC 1671, aff’d 2014 BCCA 116; as well as Samji (Re), 2013 BCSC 2101; Peters v Samji, 2013 BCSC 2290; In the Matter of s. 152 of the Securities Act......
-
Intervenors and Class Proceedings - Not Welcome at the Party?
...43 Condon, ibid at para 14. 44 Kohler v Apotex, 2015 ABQB 610. 45 See Jer et al v Samji et al, SCBC No S-121627 (Vancouver), certified at 2013 BCSC 1671, aff’d 2014 BCCA 116; as well as Samji (Re), 2013 BCSC 2101; Peters v Samji, 2013 BCSC 2290; In the Matter of s. 152 of the Securities Act......
-
Secondary Market Liability in Ontario: Interpreting the Leave Test Before and After Theratechnologies
...43 Condon, ibid at para 14. 44 Kohler v Apotex, 2015 ABQB 610. 45 See Jer et al v Samji et al, SCBC No S-121627 (Vancouver), certified at 2013 BCSC 1671, aff’d 2014 BCCA 116; as well as Samji (Re), 2013 BCSC 2101; Peters v Samji, 2013 BCSC 2290; In the Matter of s. 152 of the Securities Act......
Get Started for Free