Jokhadar v. Dehkhodaei et al., [2010] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1643 (SC)

JurisdictionBritish Columbia
JudgeWillcock, J.
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
Subject MatterDAMAGE AWARDS,DAMAGES,TORTS
Citation[2010] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1643 (SC),[2010] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1643,2010 BCSC 1643
Date22 November 2010
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
18 practice notes
  • Drodge v. Kozak et al., [2011] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1316
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • October 5, 2011
    ...suffered from increasing back symptoms even if the accident had not occurred: Zacharias v. Leys , 2005 BCCA 560; Jokhadar v. Dehkhodaei , 2010 BCSC 1643 at paras. 109-111. [141] I have considered the following cases cited by plaintiff's counsel on the issue the quantum of non-pecuniary dama......
  • Sandhu v. Bates, 2018 BCSC 2116
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • November 29, 2018
    ...that the pre-existing condition would have detrimentally affected the Plaintiff in the future in any event. See Jokhadar v. Dehkhodaei, 2010 BCSC 1643 at para. 145. Because the risk of Mrs. Sandhu having an exacerbation of her pre-existing anxiety absent the accidents is a hypothetical even......
  • Parhar v. Clarke, 2017 BCSC 550
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • March 31, 2017
    ...for the plaintiff's failure to mitigate and her pre-existing psychiatric conditions. The defendants rely upon Jockhadar v. Dehkodaei, 2010 BCSC 1643; Smith v. Fremlin, 2013 BCSC 800; Moritz v. Schmitz, 2013 BCSC 668; McConvey v. Hart, 2013 BCSC 1058 and Werner v. Ondrus, 2013 BCSC [210] In ......
  • 2023 BCSC 771,
    • Canada
    • January 1, 2023
    ...submission that the onus was on the defence to prove this was the case in any event and they did not do so (see Jokhadar v. Dehkhodaei, 2010 BCSC 1643 at para. 68 Similarly, the evidence before the Court does not support a conclusion that certain other medical issues experienced by the plai......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
18 cases
  • Drodge v. Kozak et al., [2011] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1316
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • October 5, 2011
    ...suffered from increasing back symptoms even if the accident had not occurred: Zacharias v. Leys , 2005 BCCA 560; Jokhadar v. Dehkhodaei , 2010 BCSC 1643 at paras. 109-111. [141] I have considered the following cases cited by plaintiff's counsel on the issue the quantum of non-pecuniary dama......
  • Sandhu v. Bates, 2018 BCSC 2116
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • November 29, 2018
    ...that the pre-existing condition would have detrimentally affected the Plaintiff in the future in any event. See Jokhadar v. Dehkhodaei, 2010 BCSC 1643 at para. 145. Because the risk of Mrs. Sandhu having an exacerbation of her pre-existing anxiety absent the accidents is a hypothetical even......
  • Parhar v. Clarke, 2017 BCSC 550
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • March 31, 2017
    ...for the plaintiff's failure to mitigate and her pre-existing psychiatric conditions. The defendants rely upon Jockhadar v. Dehkodaei, 2010 BCSC 1643; Smith v. Fremlin, 2013 BCSC 800; Moritz v. Schmitz, 2013 BCSC 668; McConvey v. Hart, 2013 BCSC 1058 and Werner v. Ondrus, 2013 BCSC [210] In ......
  • 2023 BCSC 771,
    • Canada
    • January 1, 2023
    ...submission that the onus was on the defence to prove this was the case in any event and they did not do so (see Jokhadar v. Dehkhodaei, 2010 BCSC 1643 at para. 68 Similarly, the evidence before the Court does not support a conclusion that certain other medical issues experienced by the plai......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT