Jonsson v Lymer, 2020 ABCA 167

JudgeThe Honourable Mr. Justice Frans Slatter,The Honourable Madam Justice Myra Bielby,The Honourable Madam Justice Barbara Lea Veldhuis
Citation2020 ABCA 167
Docket Number1803-0302-AC
CourtCourt of Appeal (Alberta)
Date01 May 2020
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
94 practice notes
  • Uber Technologies Inc. v. Heller, 2020 SCC 16
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • June 26, 2020
    ...of Canada Ltd. v. Burns & Roe Inc., [1975] 2 S.C.R. 124; Reference re Secession of Quebec, [1998] 2 S.C.R. 217; Jonsson v. Lymer, 2020 ABCA 167; B.C.G.E.U. v. British Columbia (Attorney General), [1988] 2 S.C.R. 214; Hryniak v. Mauldin, 2014 SCC 7, [2014] 1 S.C.R. 87; Novamaze Pty Ltd. ......
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (November 9 ' November 13, 2020)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • November 17, 2020
    ...v The Law Society of Upper Canada, 2015 ONCA 0733, R v Cunningham, 2010 SCC 10, R v 974649 Ontario Inc., 2001 SCC 81, Jonsson v Lymer, 2020 ABCA 167 Gagnon v Martyniuk, 2020 ONCA 708 Keywords: Family Law, Custody and Access, Civil Procedure, Contempt, Fresh Evidence, Family Law Rules, O. Re......
  • Ubah v Ubah,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • February 27, 2023
    ...from requiring any person to be represented by a lawyer, since the right to self-represent is absolute in Alberta (Jonsson v Lymer, 2020 ABCA 167), I very strongly recommend that Mr. Ubah cease on his own making leave to file Applications to the Court of King’s Bench of Alberta, and ......
  • Ubah v Canadian Natural Resources Limited,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • March 18, 2021
    ...[31] In Ubah #7 at para 43, I concluded “Mr. Ubah does not take “no” for an answer.” That pattern remains unchanged. In Jonsson v Lymer, 2020 ABCA 167 [Lymer], the Alberta Court of Appeal instructed that the criteria for court access restrictions are persistent, unmanageable, repeated, abus......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
99 cases
  • Uber Technologies Inc. v. Heller, 2020 SCC 16
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • June 26, 2020
    ...of Canada Ltd. v. Burns & Roe Inc., [1975] 2 S.C.R. 124; Reference re Secession of Quebec, [1998] 2 S.C.R. 217; Jonsson v. Lymer, 2020 ABCA 167; B.C.G.E.U. v. British Columbia (Attorney General), [1988] 2 S.C.R. 214; Hryniak v. Mauldin, 2014 SCC 7, [2014] 1 S.C.R. 87; Novamaze Pty Ltd. ......
  • Rana v Rana,
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • May 21, 2024
    ...his sibling rather than pay the outstanding costs, which says all that is needed about Mr. S. Rana's intentions. 30 In Jonsson v Lymer, 2020 ABCA 167, the Court of Appeal of Alberta ruled that no cost expense precondition may be imposed on a person subject to court access restrictions who s......
  • Ubah v Ubah, 2023 ABKB 111
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • February 27, 2023
    ...from requiring any person to be represented by a lawyer, since the right to self-represent is absolute in Alberta (Jonsson v Lymer, 2020 ABCA 167), I very strongly recommend that Mr. Ubah cease on his own making leave to file Applications to the Court of King’s Bench of Alberta, and ......
  • Ubah v Canadian Natural Resources Limited, 2021 ABQB 208
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • March 18, 2021
    ...[31] In Ubah #7 at para 43, I concluded “Mr. Ubah does not take “no” for an answer.” That pattern remains unchanged. In Jonsson v Lymer, 2020 ABCA 167 [Lymer], the Alberta Court of Appeal instructed that the criteria for court access restrictions are persistent, unmanageable, repeated, abus......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 firm's commentaries
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (November 9 ' November 13, 2020)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • November 17, 2020
    ...v The Law Society of Upper Canada, 2015 ONCA 0733, R v Cunningham, 2010 SCC 10, R v 974649 Ontario Inc., 2001 SCC 81, Jonsson v Lymer, 2020 ABCA 167 Gagnon v Martyniuk, 2020 ONCA 708 Keywords: Family Law, Custody and Access, Civil Procedure, Contempt, Fresh Evidence, Family Law Rules, O. Re......
  • Imagining the Ideal Video-Conferencing Solution
    • Canada
    • JD Supra Canada
    • May 26, 2020
    ...BCGEU v British Columbia (AG), [1988] 2 SCR 214; see also Jonsson v Lymer, 2020 ABCA 167 at para 38.6. See United Nations and the Rule of Law, “Access to Justice”, available online: www.un.org/ruleoaw/thematic-areas/access-to-justice-and-rule-of-law-institutions/access-to-justice/>. 7. See......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT