Jonsson v Lymer, 2020 ABCA 167
| Judge | The Honourable Mr. Justice Frans Slatter,The Honourable Madam Justice Myra Bielby,The Honourable Madam Justice Barbara Lea Veldhuis |
| Citation | 2020 ABCA 167 |
| Docket Number | 1803-0302-AC |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Alberta) |
| Date | 01 May 2020 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
94 practice notes
-
Uber Technologies Inc. v. Heller, 2020 SCC 16
...of Canada Ltd. v. Burns & Roe Inc., [1975] 2 S.C.R. 124; Reference re Secession of Quebec, [1998] 2 S.C.R. 217; Jonsson v. Lymer, 2020 ABCA 167; B.C.G.E.U. v. British Columbia (Attorney General), [1988] 2 S.C.R. 214; Hryniak v. Mauldin, 2014 SCC 7, [2014] 1 S.C.R. 87; Novamaze Pty Ltd. ......
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (November 9 ' November 13, 2020)
...v The Law Society of Upper Canada, 2015 ONCA 0733, R v Cunningham, 2010 SCC 10, R v 974649 Ontario Inc., 2001 SCC 81, Jonsson v Lymer, 2020 ABCA 167 Gagnon v Martyniuk, 2020 ONCA 708 Keywords: Family Law, Custody and Access, Civil Procedure, Contempt, Fresh Evidence, Family Law Rules, O. Re......
-
Ubah v Ubah,
...from requiring any person to be represented by a lawyer, since the right to self-represent is absolute in Alberta (Jonsson v Lymer, 2020 ABCA 167), I very strongly recommend that Mr. Ubah cease on his own making leave to file Applications to the Court of King’s Bench of Alberta, and ......
-
Ubah v Canadian Natural Resources Limited,
...[31] In Ubah #7 at para 43, I concluded “Mr. Ubah does not take “no” for an answer.” That pattern remains unchanged. In Jonsson v Lymer, 2020 ABCA 167 [Lymer], the Alberta Court of Appeal instructed that the criteria for court access restrictions are persistent, unmanageable, repeated, abus......
Request a trial to view additional results
87 cases
-
Uber Technologies Inc. v. Heller, 2020 SCC 16
...of Canada Ltd. v. Burns & Roe Inc., [1975] 2 S.C.R. 124; Reference re Secession of Quebec, [1998] 2 S.C.R. 217; Jonsson v. Lymer, 2020 ABCA 167; B.C.G.E.U. v. British Columbia (Attorney General), [1988] 2 S.C.R. 214; Hryniak v. Mauldin, 2014 SCC 7, [2014] 1 S.C.R. 87; Novamaze Pty Ltd. ......
-
Ubah v Ubah,
...from requiring any person to be represented by a lawyer, since the right to self-represent is absolute in Alberta (Jonsson v Lymer, 2020 ABCA 167), I very strongly recommend that Mr. Ubah cease on his own making leave to file Applications to the Court of King’s Bench of Alberta, and ......
-
Ubah v Canadian Natural Resources Limited,
...[31] In Ubah #7 at para 43, I concluded “Mr. Ubah does not take “no” for an answer.” That pattern remains unchanged. In Jonsson v Lymer, 2020 ABCA 167 [Lymer], the Alberta Court of Appeal instructed that the criteria for court access restrictions are persistent, unmanageable, repeated, abus......
-
Hayden v Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce,
...the Court’s mechanisms to manage Ms. Hayden, as they were defined and limited by the Alberta Court of Appeal in Jonsson v Lymer, 2020 ABCA 167. I simply cannot take any useful steps to achieve the policy objective set by Chief Justice Wagner in British Columbia (Attorney General) v C......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 firm's commentaries
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (November 9 ' November 13, 2020)
...v The Law Society of Upper Canada, 2015 ONCA 0733, R v Cunningham, 2010 SCC 10, R v 974649 Ontario Inc., 2001 SCC 81, Jonsson v Lymer, 2020 ABCA 167 Gagnon v Martyniuk, 2020 ONCA 708 Keywords: Family Law, Custody and Access, Civil Procedure, Contempt, Fresh Evidence, Family Law Rules, O. Re......
-
Imagining the Ideal Video-Conferencing Solution
...BCGEU v British Columbia (AG), [1988] 2 SCR 214; see also Jonsson v Lymer, 2020 ABCA 167 at para 38.6. See United Nations and the Rule of Law, “Access to Justice”, available online: www.un.org/ruleoaw/thematic-areas/access-to-justice-and-rule-of-law-institutions/access-to-justice/>. 7. See......