K.E. v. C.S.M., 2016 ABQB 342
| Judge | Browne, J. |
| Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada) |
| Case Date | June 21, 2016 |
| Citations | 2016 ABQB 342 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
6 practice notes
-
Green v University of Winnipeg,
...In my view, the applicant has failed to identify any error by the application judge. As Browne J said in KE v CSM, 2016 ABQB 342 (at para 44): Bald allegations are not enough, the vexatious litigant must show a basis upon which their application could succeed (Wong v Leung,......
-
Chisan v Fielding, 2017 ABQB 233
...litigation is a valid exercise of legislative and court authority: Hok, at para 37 of 2016 ABQB 651. c. Form of order In KE v CSM, 2016 ABQB 342 at para 36 the provided recommendations for court orders to assist persons who are typically self-represented litigants to make informative and fo......
-
Ewanchuk v Canada (Attorney General),, 2017 ABQB 237
...meaning of this word is broader. A vexatious proceeding is one that in effect abuses or misuses legal processes. Similarly, in KE v CSM, 2016 ABQB 342, Browne concluded at para 15 that “[w]hat triggers court intervention is an abuse of its processes, and vexatious litigation is, by definiti......
-
Belway v Lalande-Weber, 2017 ABCA 108
...at para 7. Reasonable grounds are determined by the existence of an arguable case: Wong v Leung, 2012 ABCA 156 at para 5, E(K) v M(CS), 2016 ABQB 342 at para Having been declared a vexatious litigant in the court appealed from, the applicant requires permission to appeal pursuant to Rule 14......
Request a trial to view additional results
6 cases
-
Green v University of Winnipeg,
...In my view, the applicant has failed to identify any error by the application judge. As Browne J said in KE v CSM, 2016 ABQB 342 (at para 44): Bald allegations are not enough, the vexatious litigant must show a basis upon which their application could succeed (Wong v Leung,......
-
Chisan v Fielding, 2017 ABQB 233
...litigation is a valid exercise of legislative and court authority: Hok, at para 37 of 2016 ABQB 651. c. Form of order In KE v CSM, 2016 ABQB 342 at para 36 the provided recommendations for court orders to assist persons who are typically self-represented litigants to make informative and fo......
-
Ewanchuk v Canada (Attorney General),, 2017 ABQB 237
...meaning of this word is broader. A vexatious proceeding is one that in effect abuses or misuses legal processes. Similarly, in KE v CSM, 2016 ABQB 342, Browne concluded at para 15 that “[w]hat triggers court intervention is an abuse of its processes, and vexatious litigation is, by definiti......
-
Belway v Lalande-Weber, 2017 ABCA 108
...at para 7. Reasonable grounds are determined by the existence of an arguable case: Wong v Leung, 2012 ABCA 156 at para 5, E(K) v M(CS), 2016 ABQB 342 at para Having been declared a vexatious litigant in the court appealed from, the applicant requires permission to appeal pursuant to Rule 14......
Request a trial to view additional results