Kapoor v. Makkar,
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Judge | The Honourable Mr. Justice Abrioux |
| Citation | 2020 BCCA 132 |
| Docket Number | CA46702 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (British Columbia) |
| Date | 30 April 2020 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
10 practice notes
-
Mynio v Mynio
...B.C. Reg. 169/2009 [ Rules] gives the court discretion to order the sale of property, subject to directions. 50 In Kapoor v. Makkar, 2020 BCCA 132, at para. 46, the Court of Appeal said that the case of Reilly v. Reilly, [1992] B.C.J. No. 2561 (B.C.C.A.) [ Reilly]: …confirmed the court's au......
-
Kapoor v. Makkar
...Docket E054162). On an application to vary: An order of the Court of Appeal for British Columbia dated April 30, 2020 (Kapoor v. Makkar, 2020 BCCA 132, Vancouver Docket Oral Reasons for Judgment Counsel for the Appellant (via teleconference on July 30, 2020): J.E. Shragge E.S. White Counsel......
-
M.B.F. v. A.R.F.
...comments in Maryoush v. Ibrahim, 2020 BCSC 599 at paragraphs 90-91. [78]        In Kapoor v. Makkar, 2020 BCCA 132 at paragraph 46, the court summarizes the factors considered in an application for interim sale of a family 46  Furthermore, in so ......
-
Harper v. Harper
...provides that where it appears necessary or expedient that a property be sold, a court may order such a sale; see Kapoor v. Makkar, 2020 BCCA 132, at para. 46; and Karringten v. Morrisonn, 2020 BCSC 1797, at para. 122. In Kapoor, our Court of Appeal set out a number of factors to ......
Get Started for Free
10 cases
-
Mynio v Mynio
...B.C. Reg. 169/2009 [ Rules] gives the court discretion to order the sale of property, subject to directions. 50 In Kapoor v. Makkar, 2020 BCCA 132, at para. 46, the Court of Appeal said that the case of Reilly v. Reilly, [1992] B.C.J. No. 2561 (B.C.C.A.) [ Reilly]: …confirmed the court's au......
-
Kapoor v. Makkar
...Docket E054162). On an application to vary: An order of the Court of Appeal for British Columbia dated April 30, 2020 (Kapoor v. Makkar, 2020 BCCA 132, Vancouver Docket Oral Reasons for Judgment Counsel for the Appellant (via teleconference on July 30, 2020): J.E. Shragge E.S. White Counsel......
-
M.B.F. v. A.R.F.
...comments in Maryoush v. Ibrahim, 2020 BCSC 599 at paragraphs 90-91. [78]        In Kapoor v. Makkar, 2020 BCCA 132 at paragraph 46, the court summarizes the factors considered in an application for interim sale of a family 46  Furthermore, in so ......
-
Harper v. Harper
...provides that where it appears necessary or expedient that a property be sold, a court may order such a sale; see Kapoor v. Makkar, 2020 BCCA 132, at para. 46; and Karringten v. Morrisonn, 2020 BCSC 1797, at para. 122. In Kapoor, our Court of Appeal set out a number of factors to ......
Get Started for Free