Kapoor v. Makkar, 2020 BCCA 132
| Judge | The Honourable Mr. Justice Abrioux |
| Court | Court of Appeal (British Columbia) |
| Case Date | April 30, 2020 |
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Citations | 2020 BCCA 132 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
9 practice notes
-
Kapoor v. Makkar, 2020 BCCA 223
...Docket E054162). On an application to vary: An order of the Court of Appeal for British Columbia dated April 30, 2020 (Kapoor v. Makkar, 2020 BCCA 132, Vancouver Docket Oral Reasons for Judgment Counsel for the Appellant (via teleconference on July 30, 2020): J.E. Shragge E.S. White Counsel......
-
M.B.F. v. A.R.F.,
...comments in Maryoush v. Ibrahim, 2020 BCSC 599 at paragraphs 90-91. [78] In Kapoor v. Makkar, 2020 BCCA 132 at paragraph 46, the court summarizes the factors considered in an application for interim sale of a family 46 Furthermore, in so ......
-
McMillan v. McMillan,
...counterclaims would need to be resolved at trial. The Law [11] Both parties cited Kapoor v. Makkar, 2020 BCCA 132. From para. 46 in Kapoor, the following guidance is found: if the sale is not necessary, the expedient criterion in the family rule means tha......
-
Yautzoglu v. Tselios, 2020 BCSC 1931
...2016 BCSC 1778 at para. 21. [45] These factors were set out in more detail in Kapoor v. Makkar, 2020 BCCA 132. In Kapoor at para. 46, the Court cited with approval the statement contained in A.B. v. C.D., 2015 BCSC 2134, that any doubt about whether an or......
Request a trial to view additional results
9 cases
-
Kapoor v. Makkar, 2020 BCCA 223
...Docket E054162). On an application to vary: An order of the Court of Appeal for British Columbia dated April 30, 2020 (Kapoor v. Makkar, 2020 BCCA 132, Vancouver Docket Oral Reasons for Judgment Counsel for the Appellant (via teleconference on July 30, 2020): J.E. Shragge E.S. White Counsel......
-
M.B.F. v. A.R.F.,
...comments in Maryoush v. Ibrahim, 2020 BCSC 599 at paragraphs 90-91. [78] In Kapoor v. Makkar, 2020 BCCA 132 at paragraph 46, the court summarizes the factors considered in an application for interim sale of a family 46 Furthermore, in so ......
-
Yautzoglu v. Tselios, 2020 BCSC 1931
...2016 BCSC 1778 at para. 21. [45] These factors were set out in more detail in Kapoor v. Makkar, 2020 BCCA 132. In Kapoor at para. 46, the Court cited with approval the statement contained in A.B. v. C.D., 2015 BCSC 2134, that any doubt about whether an or......
-
McMillan v. McMillan,
...counterclaims would need to be resolved at trial. The Law [11] Both parties cited Kapoor v. Makkar, 2020 BCCA 132. From para. 46 in Kapoor, the following guidance is found: if the sale is not necessary, the expedient criterion in the family rule means tha......
Request a trial to view additional results