Katz v. Nimelman
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Judge | Sharpe, Armstrong and Juriansz, JJ.A. |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Ontario) |
| Citation | [2009] O.A.C. Uned. 289 (CA),2009 ONCA 445,[2009] O.A.C. Uned. 289 |
| Date | 22 May 2009 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
3 practice notes
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (December 9 December 13, 2019)
...s 5(2), s 6(1), s 6(10), Business Corporations Act, RSO 1990, c B16, s 193(1), s 141(1), Re Burke, [1960] OR 26 (CA), Katz v Nimelman, 2009 ONCA 445 Short Civil Decisions Curtis v. Pinto , 2019 ONCA 982 Keywords: Civil Procedure, Striking Pleadings, Abuse of Process, Toronto (City) v. C.U.P......
-
Trezzi v. Trezzi,
...2(8) of the FLA in order to elect whether to file a surviving spouse’s election is entitled to substantial deference: Katz v. Nimelman, 2009 ONCA 445, 73 R.F.L. (6th) 288, at para. 3. The party seeking to challenge such a decision must show an error in the application of the principles rele......
-
Whiteside v. Govindasamy,
...paras. 12-13 of Schedule C (Admissibility Ruling). [46] In Katz v. Nimelman (2007), 46 R.F.L. (6th) 392 (Ont. S.C.), at para. 65, aff’d 2009 ONCA 445, the court drew an adverse inference against the wife at a trial throughout which “disclosure was a continuing thread.” The court concluded t......
2 cases
-
Trezzi v. Trezzi,
...2(8) of the FLA in order to elect whether to file a surviving spouse’s election is entitled to substantial deference: Katz v. Nimelman, 2009 ONCA 445, 73 R.F.L. (6th) 288, at para. 3. The party seeking to challenge such a decision must show an error in the application of the principles rele......
-
Whiteside v. Govindasamy, 2021 ONSC 789
...paras. 12-13 of Schedule C (Admissibility Ruling). [46] In Katz v. Nimelman (2007), 46 R.F.L. (6th) 392 (Ont. S.C.), at para. 65, aff’d 2009 ONCA 445, the court drew an adverse inference against the wife at a trial throughout which “disclosure was a continuing thread.” The court concluded t......
1 firm's commentaries
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (December 9 December 13, 2019)
...s 5(2), s 6(1), s 6(10), Business Corporations Act, RSO 1990, c B16, s 193(1), s 141(1), Re Burke, [1960] OR 26 (CA), Katz v Nimelman, 2009 ONCA 445 Short Civil Decisions Curtis v. Pinto , 2019 ONCA 982 Keywords: Civil Procedure, Striking Pleadings, Abuse of Process, Toronto (City) v. C.U.P......