Kavanagh v. Kavanagh, 2016 ABQB 107

JudgeShelley, J.
CourtCourt of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
Subject MatterEQUITY,FAMILY LAW,PRACTICE,CRIMINAL LAW
Citation2016 ABQB 107
Date18 February 2016
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
9 practice notes
  • Laird v (Alberta) Maintenance Enforcement, 2019 ABQB 12
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • January 9, 2019
    ...meaning of this word is broader. A vexatious proceeding is one that in effect abuses or misuses legal processes: Kavanagh v Kavanagh, 2016 ABQB 107, [2016] AWLD 1516 at para [65] They also note that a court may order access restrictions where future litigation abuse is anticipated: Hok v Al......
  • K.E. v. C.S.M., 2016 ABQB 342
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • June 21, 2016
    ...proceedings. These persons are often called "vexatious litigants", however, as Justice Shelley recently observed in Kavanagh v Kavanagh , 2016 ABQB 107 at para 64, what really defines this category of litigants is not so much intent, but effect: ... All misuse legal procedure in a manner th......
  • R. v. Hok (A.), 2016 ABQB 335
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • June 17, 2016
    ...dispute (including activities both inside and outside court) and other litigation and court history: Chutskoff ; Kavanagh v Kavanagh , 2016 ABQB 107 at para 66. [84] Recently, in RO v DF , 2016 ABCA 170, the Alberta Court of Appeal noted that vexatious litigation and vexatious litigants are......
  • HRMT v SNS, 2018 ABQB 843
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • October 5, 2018
    ...not done so. She requests that her application in this regard be adjourned so that such notice can be given. [103] Kavanagh v Kavanagh, 2016 ABQB 107 at para 66 outlines some of the traits of a vexatious litigant, as well as some of the factors the court should consider in whether or not to......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
9 cases
  • Laird v (Alberta) Maintenance Enforcement, 2019 ABQB 12
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • January 9, 2019
    ...meaning of this word is broader. A vexatious proceeding is one that in effect abuses or misuses legal processes: Kavanagh v Kavanagh, 2016 ABQB 107, [2016] AWLD 1516 at para [65] They also note that a court may order access restrictions where future litigation abuse is anticipated: Hok v Al......
  • K.E. v. C.S.M., 2016 ABQB 342
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • June 21, 2016
    ...proceedings. These persons are often called "vexatious litigants", however, as Justice Shelley recently observed in Kavanagh v Kavanagh , 2016 ABQB 107 at para 64, what really defines this category of litigants is not so much intent, but effect: ... All misuse legal procedure in a manner th......
  • R. v. Hok (A.), 2016 ABQB 335
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • June 17, 2016
    ...dispute (including activities both inside and outside court) and other litigation and court history: Chutskoff ; Kavanagh v Kavanagh , 2016 ABQB 107 at para 66. [84] Recently, in RO v DF , 2016 ABCA 170, the Alberta Court of Appeal noted that vexatious litigation and vexatious litigants are......
  • HRMT v SNS, 2018 ABQB 843
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • October 5, 2018
    ...not done so. She requests that her application in this regard be adjourned so that such notice can be given. [103] Kavanagh v Kavanagh, 2016 ABQB 107 at para 66 outlines some of the traits of a vexatious litigant, as well as some of the factors the court should consider in whether or not to......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT